Factors Affecting Selection of TraineE for Neurointervention (FASTEN).

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1177/15910199241232726
Mohamed Elfil, Rami Z Morsi, Sherief Ghozy, Ahmed Elmashad, Adnan Siddiqui, Alhamza R Al-Bayati, Ali Alaraj, Allan Brook, Anthony W Kam, Arindam Rano Chatterjee, Athos Patsalides, Ben Waldau, Charles J Prestigiacomo, Charles Matouk, Clemens M Schirmer, David Altschul, David T Parrella, Gabor Toth, Gaurav Jindal, Hamza A Shaikh, Jaydevsinh N Dolia, Johanna T Fifi, Justin F Fraser, Justin Thomas DO, Krishna Amuluru, Louis J Kim, Mark Harrigan, Matthew R Amans, Max Kole, Max Mokin, Michael Abraham, Mouhammad Jumaa, Nazli Janjua, Osama Zaidat, Patrick P Youssef, Priyank Khandelwal, Qingliang Tony Wang, Ramesh Grandhi, Ricardo Hanel, Ryan T Kellogg, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Sunil Sheth, Thanh N Nguyen, Viktor Szeder, Yin C Hu, Albert J Yoo, Omar Tanweer, Brian Jankowitz, Jeremy J Heit, Richard Williamson, Tareq Kass-Hout, Richard W Crowley, Mohammad El-Ghanem, Fawaz Al-Mufti
{"title":"Factors Affecting Selection of TraineE for Neurointervention (FASTEN).","authors":"Mohamed Elfil, Rami Z Morsi, Sherief Ghozy, Ahmed Elmashad, Adnan Siddiqui, Alhamza R Al-Bayati, Ali Alaraj, Allan Brook, Anthony W Kam, Arindam Rano Chatterjee, Athos Patsalides, Ben Waldau, Charles J Prestigiacomo, Charles Matouk, Clemens M Schirmer, David Altschul, David T Parrella, Gabor Toth, Gaurav Jindal, Hamza A Shaikh, Jaydevsinh N Dolia, Johanna T Fifi, Justin F Fraser, Justin Thomas DO, Krishna Amuluru, Louis J Kim, Mark Harrigan, Matthew R Amans, Max Kole, Max Mokin, Michael Abraham, Mouhammad Jumaa, Nazli Janjua, Osama Zaidat, Patrick P Youssef, Priyank Khandelwal, Qingliang Tony Wang, Ramesh Grandhi, Ricardo Hanel, Ryan T Kellogg, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Sunil Sheth, Thanh N Nguyen, Viktor Szeder, Yin C Hu, Albert J Yoo, Omar Tanweer, Brian Jankowitz, Jeremy J Heit, Richard Williamson, Tareq Kass-Hout, Richard W Crowley, Mohammad El-Ghanem, Fawaz Al-Mufti","doi":"10.1177/15910199241232726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Neurointervention is a very competitive specialty in the United States due to the limited number of training spots and the larger pool of applicants. The training standards are continuously updated to ensure solid training experiences. Factors affecting candidate(s) selection have not been fully established yet. Our study aims to investigate the factors influencing the selection process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 52-question survey was distributed to 93 program directors (PDs). The survey consisted of six categories: (a) Program characteristics, (b) Candidate demographics, (c) Educational credentials, (d) Personal traits, (e) Research and extracurricular activities, and (f) Overall final set of characteristics. The response rate was 59.1%. As per the programs' characteristics, neurosurgery was the most involved specialty in running the training programs (69%). Regarding demographics, the need for visa sponsorship held the greatest prominence with a mean score of 5.9 [standard deviation (SD) 2.9]. For the educational credentials, being a graduate from a neurosurgical residency and the institution where the candidate's residency training is/was scored the highest [5.4 (SD = 2.9), 5.4 (SD = 2.5), respectively]. Regarding the personal traits, assessment by faculty members achieved the highest score [8.9 (SD = 1)]. In terms of research/extracurricular activities, fluency in English had the highest score [7.2 (SD = 1.9)] followed by peer-reviewed/PubMed-indexed publications [6.4 (SD = 2.2)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey investigated the factors influencing the final decision when choosing the future neurointerventional trainee, including demographic, educational, research, and extracurricular activities, which might serve as valuable guidance for both applicants and programs to refine the selection process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241232726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241232726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance: Neurointervention is a very competitive specialty in the United States due to the limited number of training spots and the larger pool of applicants. The training standards are continuously updated to ensure solid training experiences. Factors affecting candidate(s) selection have not been fully established yet. Our study aims to investigate the factors influencing the selection process.

Methods: A 52-question survey was distributed to 93 program directors (PDs). The survey consisted of six categories: (a) Program characteristics, (b) Candidate demographics, (c) Educational credentials, (d) Personal traits, (e) Research and extracurricular activities, and (f) Overall final set of characteristics. The response rate was 59.1%. As per the programs' characteristics, neurosurgery was the most involved specialty in running the training programs (69%). Regarding demographics, the need for visa sponsorship held the greatest prominence with a mean score of 5.9 [standard deviation (SD) 2.9]. For the educational credentials, being a graduate from a neurosurgical residency and the institution where the candidate's residency training is/was scored the highest [5.4 (SD = 2.9), 5.4 (SD = 2.5), respectively]. Regarding the personal traits, assessment by faculty members achieved the highest score [8.9 (SD = 1)]. In terms of research/extracurricular activities, fluency in English had the highest score [7.2 (SD = 1.9)] followed by peer-reviewed/PubMed-indexed publications [6.4 (SD = 2.2)].

Conclusion: Our survey investigated the factors influencing the final decision when choosing the future neurointerventional trainee, including demographic, educational, research, and extracurricular activities, which might serve as valuable guidance for both applicants and programs to refine the selection process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响神经干预 TraineE 选择的因素 (FASTEN)。
背景和重要性:在美国,神经介入是一个竞争非常激烈的专业,因为培训名额有限,申请者众多。培训标准不断更新,以确保获得扎实的培训经验。影响候选人选择的因素尚未完全确定。我们的研究旨在调查影响选拔过程的因素:我们向 93 名项目主任(PDs)发放了一份包含 52 个问题的调查问卷。调查包括六个类别:(a)项目特征;(b)候选人人口统计学特征;(c)学历;(d)个人特质;(e)研究和课外活动;以及(f)总体最终特征。回复率为 59.1%。从项目特点来看,神经外科是参与培训项目最多的专业(69%)。在人口统计学方面,对签证担保的需求最为突出,平均得分为 5.9 [标准差(SD)为 2.9]。在学历方面,毕业于神经外科住院医师培训机构和候选人的住院医师培训机构得分最高[分别为 5.4(标准差 = 2.9)、5.4(标准差 = 2.5)]。在个人特质方面,教师的评估得分最高[8.9 (SD = 1)]。在研究/课外活动方面,英语流利程度得分最高[7.2 (SD = 1.9)],其次是发表过同行评审/PubMed收录的论文[6.4 (SD = 2.2)]:我们的调查研究了在选择未来的神经介入培训生时影响最终决定的因素,包括人口统计学、教育、研究和课外活动,这些因素可能对申请者和培训项目完善选择过程起到宝贵的指导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study. "Chopperlysis": The effect of helicopter transport on reperfusion and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. DWI lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with contour or WEB-does the device matter? Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Recognition of dural to pial supply in high-grade dural arteriovenous fistula: A technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1