Intraoperative lung protection: strategies and their impact on outcomes.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001341
Rachele Simonte, Gianmaria Cammarota, Edoardo De Robertis
{"title":"Intraoperative lung protection: strategies and their impact on outcomes.","authors":"Rachele Simonte, Gianmaria Cammarota, Edoardo De Robertis","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems.

Recent findings: Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research.

Summary: Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中肺保护:策略及其对结果的影响。
综述目的:本综述总结了当前的知识以及在根据先进的监护系统实施针对个体患者的肺保护性通气策略时遇到的障碍:肺保护性通气已成为围手术期护理的重要组成部分,旨在提高患者的预后并降低术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的发生率。高质量的研究已经证实了低潮气量通气和低驱动压力等策略的益处。关于最合适的呼气末正压(PEEP)水平和招募操作的作用,目前仍有争论。根据患者的具体因素调整 PEEP 可在保持通气分布均匀性方面带来潜在的益处,尤其是在腹腔积气和陡峭的 Trendelenburg 体位等具有挑战性的情况下。先进的监测系统可持续评估患者的反应并微调通气参数,提供实时数据分析以预测和预防即将发生的肺部并发症。然而,这些系统对术后结果的影响,尤其是对 PPCs 的影响,仍是一个持续研究的领域:完善保护性肺通气对于在手术期间为患者提供最佳护理、降低 PPC 的发生率以及改善患者的整体手术过程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative pain management after abdominal transplantations. An update on the perioperative management of postcraniotomy pain. Anesthesia for traumatic brain injury. Harnessing artificial intelligence for predicting and managing postoperative pain: a narrative literature review. Keeping patients in the dark: perioperative anesthetic considerations for patients receiving 5-aminolevulinic acid for glioma resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1