Massive transfusion in trauma.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001347
Heiko Lier, Björn Hossfeld
{"title":"Massive transfusion in trauma.","authors":"Heiko Lier, Björn Hossfeld","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for traumatic hemorrhage shock, with a special focus on massive transfusion.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Severe trauma patients require massive transfusion, but consensual international definitions for traumatic hemorrhage shock and massive transfusion are missing. Current literature defines a massive transfusion as transfusion of a minimum of 3-4 packed red blood cells within 1 h. Using standard laboratory and/or viscoelastic tests, earliest diagnosis and treatment should focus on trauma-induced coagulopathy and substitution of substantiated deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To initiate therapy immediately massive transfusion protocols are helpful focusing on early hemorrhage control using hemostatic dressing and tourniquets, correction of metabolic derangements to decrease coagulopathy and substitution according to viscoelastic assays and blood gases analysis with tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, red blood cells, plasma and platelets are recommended. Alternatively, the use of whole blood is possible. If needed, further support using prothrombin complex, factor XIII or desmopressin is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for traumatic hemorrhage shock, with a special focus on massive transfusion.

Recent findings: Severe trauma patients require massive transfusion, but consensual international definitions for traumatic hemorrhage shock and massive transfusion are missing. Current literature defines a massive transfusion as transfusion of a minimum of 3-4 packed red blood cells within 1 h. Using standard laboratory and/or viscoelastic tests, earliest diagnosis and treatment should focus on trauma-induced coagulopathy and substitution of substantiated deficiencies.

Summary: To initiate therapy immediately massive transfusion protocols are helpful focusing on early hemorrhage control using hemostatic dressing and tourniquets, correction of metabolic derangements to decrease coagulopathy and substitution according to viscoelastic assays and blood gases analysis with tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, red blood cells, plasma and platelets are recommended. Alternatively, the use of whole blood is possible. If needed, further support using prothrombin complex, factor XIII or desmopressin is suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤中的大量输血。
综述目的:本综述旨在概述目前推荐的创伤性失血性休克治疗方法,特别关注大量输血:最新研究结果:严重创伤患者需要大量输血,但国际上对创伤性失血性休克和大量输血缺乏一致的定义。目前的文献将大量输血定义为在 1 小时内至少输注 3-4 个包装红细胞。使用标准实验室和/或粘弹性测试,最早的诊断和治疗应侧重于创伤引起的凝血功能障碍,并替代已证实的缺乏症。小结:立即启动大量输血治疗方案很有帮助,重点是使用止血敷料和止血带控制早期出血,纠正代谢紊乱以减少凝血病变,并根据粘弹性检测和血气分析使用氨甲环酸、浓缩纤维蛋白原、红细胞、血浆和血小板进行替代。此外,也可以使用全血。如有必要,建议使用凝血酶原复合物、XIII因子或去氨加压素进一步支持治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning: implications and applications for ambulatory anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients. Mitigating and preventing perioperative opioid-related harm. More than pacemakers and defibrillators: perioperative management of implantable devices for patient safety. Safety amid the scalpels: creating psychological safety in the operating room.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1