[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].

Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng
{"title":"[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].","authors":"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i><0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.

Methods: 17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired t-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.

Results: There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( P>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( P<0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.

Conclusion: Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[呼吸机常规重复使用管道和一次性管道的质量控制研究]。
目的:探讨常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道对呼吸机质控结果的影响:方法:随机抽取 17 台呼吸机,分别使用常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道进行质控。记录质控数据,然后采用配对 t 检验法分析两种管道之间的差异是否显著:结果:两种管道的呼吸频率、潮气量和气道末压差异无学意义(P>0.05)。常规可重复使用管道的气道峰压明显高于一次性管道(P<0.05),但差异很小,只有约 0.2 毫巴,不会影响质量控制结论:结论:常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道不会影响呼吸机的质量控制,两者可以相互替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国医疗器械杂志
中国医疗器械杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8086
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[12-Lead Holter Integrated with Sleep Monitoring Module]. [Bowel Sounds Detection Method Based on ResNet-BiLSTM and Attention Mechanism]. [Clinical Application of Equivalent Uniform Dose in Intensity-Modulated Rotational Radiotherapy Based on Eclipse TPS]. [Clinical Validation of a Prototype Smart Non-Invasive Pregnancy Glucose Monitor]. [Clinical Validation Study of Deep Learning-Generated Magnetic Resonance Images].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1