{"title":"[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].","authors":"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i><0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.
Methods: 17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired t-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.
Results: There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( P>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( P<0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.
Conclusion: Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.