Incidence and Risk Factors of Iliac Artery Rupture during Aortoiliac Stenting.

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Specialist International Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.5758/vsi.230114
KwangJin Lee, Sungsin Cho, Hyangkyoung Kim, Jin Hyun Joh
{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors of Iliac Artery Rupture during Aortoiliac Stenting.","authors":"KwangJin Lee, Sungsin Cho, Hyangkyoung Kim, Jin Hyun Joh","doi":"10.5758/vsi.230114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is widely prevalent and leads to severe claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Stent placement for AIOD demonstrated excellent outcomes in terms of long-term patency. However, iliac artery rupture is the most fearful complication during the aortoiliac stenting (AIS). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of iliac artery rupture during AIS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of consecutive patients with AIOD treated with AIS from 2009 to 2021 was completed. We excluded patients with instent restenosis. All types of stents, including self-expanding stent (SES), balloon-expandable stent (BES), or balloon-expandable covered stent (CS), were used. Angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes were analyzed. Procedural success was defined as the residual stenosis <30%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 242 patients (86.8% male; mean age 68.8±10.0 years) with de novo AIOD were treated with AIS. The procedural success rate was 100%. Rupture occurred in six patients (2.5%) and all ruptures were occurred in the external iliac artery (EIA). Stenting of the EIA and less calcified lesion were risk factors for iliac rupture (P=0.028). All cases of iliac artery rupture were successfully treated with the CSs. Overall primary patency rates were 98.0% and 93.4% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Primary patency rates of SES, BES, and CS were 87.7%, 88.4%, and 100% at 36 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of iliac artery rupture during AIS was 2.5%. Stent placement in the less calcified lesion and EIA was a risk factor for rupture during AIS. Placement of the CS can be the straightforward solution in case of iliac artery rupture during AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":52311,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Specialist International","volume":"40 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10884543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Specialist International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.230114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is widely prevalent and leads to severe claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Stent placement for AIOD demonstrated excellent outcomes in terms of long-term patency. However, iliac artery rupture is the most fearful complication during the aortoiliac stenting (AIS). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of iliac artery rupture during AIS.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with AIOD treated with AIS from 2009 to 2021 was completed. We excluded patients with instent restenosis. All types of stents, including self-expanding stent (SES), balloon-expandable stent (BES), or balloon-expandable covered stent (CS), were used. Angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes were analyzed. Procedural success was defined as the residual stenosis <30%.

Results: A total of 242 patients (86.8% male; mean age 68.8±10.0 years) with de novo AIOD were treated with AIS. The procedural success rate was 100%. Rupture occurred in six patients (2.5%) and all ruptures were occurred in the external iliac artery (EIA). Stenting of the EIA and less calcified lesion were risk factors for iliac rupture (P=0.028). All cases of iliac artery rupture were successfully treated with the CSs. Overall primary patency rates were 98.0% and 93.4% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Primary patency rates of SES, BES, and CS were 87.7%, 88.4%, and 100% at 36 months, respectively.

Conclusion: The incidence of iliac artery rupture during AIS was 2.5%. Stent placement in the less calcified lesion and EIA was a risk factor for rupture during AIS. Placement of the CS can be the straightforward solution in case of iliac artery rupture during AIS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉髂动脉支架植入术中髂动脉破裂的发生率和风险因素
目的:主动脉髂闭塞症(AIOD)广泛流行,可导致严重跛行或危及肢体的慢性缺血。髂主动脉闭塞症的支架置入术在长期通畅性方面效果显著。然而,髂动脉破裂是主动脉髂动脉支架置入术(AIS)中最令人恐惧的并发症。本研究旨在评估 AIS 期间髂动脉破裂的发生率和风险因素:我们对2009年至2021年间接受AIS治疗的连续AIOD患者进行了回顾性研究。我们排除了有支架再狭窄的患者。使用了所有类型的支架,包括自膨胀支架(SES)、球囊扩张支架(BES)或球囊扩张覆盖支架(CS)。对血管造影特征和手术结果进行了分析。手术成功定义为残余狭窄结果:共有 242 名新发 AIOD 患者(86.8% 为男性,平均年龄为 68.8±10.0 岁)接受了 AIS 治疗。手术成功率为 100%。有 6 名患者(2.5%)发生破裂,所有破裂均发生在髂外动脉(EIA)。髂外动脉支架植入和病变钙化程度较低是髂动脉破裂的风险因素(P=0.028)。所有髂动脉破裂病例均成功接受了 CS 治疗。12个月和36个月时的总体初次通畅率分别为98.0%和93.4%。在36个月时,SES、BES和CS的初次通畅率分别为87.7%、88.4%和100%:结论:AIS期间髂动脉破裂的发生率为2.5%。在钙化程度较低的病变部位和 EIA 植入支架是 AIS 期间发生破裂的风险因素。在 AIS 期间发生髂动脉破裂时,放置 CS 是最直接的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Techniques of Oncovascular Reconstruction of Portal and Mesenteric Veins during Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery. Long-term Patency and Complications of Endovascular and Surgical Revascularization for Takayasu Arteritis. Endovascular Management of an Isolated Common Iliac Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with an Ectopic Pelvic Kidney: A Case Report. Cyanoacrylate Glue Ablation for Symptomatic Reflux in a Duplicated Femoral Vein: A Case Report. Evaluation of Aortic Diseases Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1