Internet-based behavioural activation therapy versus online psychoeducation for self-reported suicidal ideation in individuals with depression in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of an RCT.

0 PSYCHIATRY BMJ mental health Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300918
Caroline B B C M Heuschen, Koen Bolhuis, Jasper B Zantvoord, Retha Arjadi, Damiaan A J P Denys, Maaike H Nauta, Anja Lok, Claudi L Bockting
{"title":"Internet-based behavioural activation therapy versus online psychoeducation for self-reported suicidal ideation in individuals with depression in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of an RCT.","authors":"Caroline B B C M Heuschen, Koen Bolhuis, Jasper B Zantvoord, Retha Arjadi, Damiaan A J P Denys, Maaike H Nauta, Anja Lok, Claudi L Bockting","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Southeast Asia has the highest suicide mortality worldwide. To improve our knowledge on the effectiveness of interventions for suicidal ideation (SI) in individuals with depression in Indonesia, we conducted a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored whether an internet-based behavioural activation (BA) intervention ('Guided Act and Feel Indonesia' (GAF-ID)) was superior in targeting SI compared with online-delivered psychoeducation (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 313 participants were randomised between treatment allocation. The SI item of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was the primary outcome measure. Mediation analyses were conducted to identify if BA at week 10 mediated the relationship between intervention and SI at week 24.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing SI compared with online minimal PE at week 10 (OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.37 to 1.01)), nor at week 24 (OR 0.84, 95% CI (0.47 to 1.52)). SI at week 24 was not mediated by BA at week 10 (b=-0.03, 95% CI (-0.05 to 0.00), p=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In individuals with depression in Indonesia, the GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing self-reported SI compared with PE. Also, the association between treatment condition and SI at week 24 was not mediated via BA at week 10.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study supports the need for further research on the efficacy of psychological treatments targeting SI in the Southeast Asia context.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Southeast Asia has the highest suicide mortality worldwide. To improve our knowledge on the effectiveness of interventions for suicidal ideation (SI) in individuals with depression in Indonesia, we conducted a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Objective: We explored whether an internet-based behavioural activation (BA) intervention ('Guided Act and Feel Indonesia' (GAF-ID)) was superior in targeting SI compared with online-delivered psychoeducation (PE).

Methods: In total, 313 participants were randomised between treatment allocation. The SI item of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was the primary outcome measure. Mediation analyses were conducted to identify if BA at week 10 mediated the relationship between intervention and SI at week 24.

Findings: The GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing SI compared with online minimal PE at week 10 (OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.37 to 1.01)), nor at week 24 (OR 0.84, 95% CI (0.47 to 1.52)). SI at week 24 was not mediated by BA at week 10 (b=-0.03, 95% CI (-0.05 to 0.00), p=0.07).

Conclusions: In individuals with depression in Indonesia, the GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing self-reported SI compared with PE. Also, the association between treatment condition and SI at week 24 was not mediated via BA at week 10.

Clinical implications: This study supports the need for further research on the efficacy of psychological treatments targeting SI in the Southeast Asia context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联网的行为激活疗法与在线心理教育对印度尼西亚抑郁症患者自我报告的自杀意念的治疗效果对比:一项 RCT 的二次分析。
背景:东南亚是全球自杀死亡率最高的地区。为了增进我们对印度尼西亚抑郁症患者自杀意念(SI)干预效果的了解,我们对一项随机对照试验进行了二次分析:我们探讨了与在线心理教育(PE)相比,基于互联网的行为激活(BA)干预("印度尼西亚指导行动与感受"(GAF-ID))在针对自杀意念(SI)方面是否更有优势:共有 313 名参与者被随机分配到不同的治疗方案中。患者健康问卷-9中的SI项目是主要的结果测量指标。研究人员进行了中介分析,以确定第 10 周的 BA 是否对第 24 周的干预与 SI 之间的关系起中介作用:在第 10 周(OR 0.61,95% CI (0.37 to 1.01))和第 24 周(OR 0.84,95% CI (0.47 to 1.52)),GAF-ID 干预在降低 SI 方面与在线最小 PE 相比并无优势。第24周的SI不受第10周BA的影响(b=-0.03,95% CI (-0.05 to 0.00),p=0.07):结论:在印度尼西亚的抑郁症患者中,GAF-ID干预与PE相比,在减少自我报告的SI方面并无优势。此外,治疗条件与第 24 周的 SI 之间的关系也不是通过第 10 周的 BA 来调节的:本研究表明,有必要在东南亚地区进一步研究针对 SI 的心理疗法的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital sleep phenotype and wrist actigraphy in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Professional experiences on use of the mental health act in ethnically diverse populations: a photovoice study. Will things feel better in the morning? A time-of-day analysis of mental health and wellbeing from nearly 1 million observations. A qualitative study exploring the feasibility and acceptability of computerised adaptive testing to assess and monitor children and young people's mental health in primary care settings in the UK. Minimally important change on the Columbia Impairment Scale and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in youths seeking mental healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1