Association between Active Hobby before Hospitalization and Frailty at Discharge in Patients with Acute Cardiovascular Disease.

Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20240007
Chihiro Nakane, Tsubasa Yokote, Takatoshi Nishimura, Shoichiro Furukawa, Shujiro Inoue
{"title":"Association between Active Hobby before Hospitalization and Frailty at Discharge in Patients with Acute Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Chihiro Nakane, Tsubasa Yokote, Takatoshi Nishimura, Shoichiro Furukawa, Shujiro Inoue","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is essential to identify the factors that reduce the risk of frailty at discharge in patients with cardiovascular disease. We sought to verify the association between pre-admission hobbies and frailty at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute cardiovascular diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the cases of the 269 patients admitted to our hospital with cardiovascular diseases, excluding those who required assistance with activities of daily living before admission or had missing data on hobbies or frailty. The patients' pre-admission hobbies (if any) were recorded, and the patients were then classified into the no-hobby group, inactive-hobby group, or active-hobby group. Frailty was assessed using the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria (Japanese version) on the day before discharge. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis to investigate the relationship between hobbies and frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the no-hobby group, the inactive-hobby group did not show a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) for pre-frailty and frailty. In contrast, the active-hobby group showed a significantly lower OR for pre-frailty and frailty even after adjustment (OR: 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.90). Regarding the components of frailty, the active-hobby group had lower ORs for slow gait speed, exhaustion, and low physical activity relative to the no-hobby group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even if patients had hobbies before admission, if those hobbies were non-active, they did not reduce the risk of frailty, suggesting the need for reconsidering rehabilitation approaches during hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"20240007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10878813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: It is essential to identify the factors that reduce the risk of frailty at discharge in patients with cardiovascular disease. We sought to verify the association between pre-admission hobbies and frailty at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute cardiovascular diseases.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of the 269 patients admitted to our hospital with cardiovascular diseases, excluding those who required assistance with activities of daily living before admission or had missing data on hobbies or frailty. The patients' pre-admission hobbies (if any) were recorded, and the patients were then classified into the no-hobby group, inactive-hobby group, or active-hobby group. Frailty was assessed using the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria (Japanese version) on the day before discharge. We conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis to investigate the relationship between hobbies and frailty.

Results: Compared with the no-hobby group, the inactive-hobby group did not show a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) for pre-frailty and frailty. In contrast, the active-hobby group showed a significantly lower OR for pre-frailty and frailty even after adjustment (OR: 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.90). Regarding the components of frailty, the active-hobby group had lower ORs for slow gait speed, exhaustion, and low physical activity relative to the no-hobby group.

Conclusions: Even if patients had hobbies before admission, if those hobbies were non-active, they did not reduce the risk of frailty, suggesting the need for reconsidering rehabilitation approaches during hospitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性心血管疾病患者住院前的业余爱好与出院时体质虚弱之间的关系
目的:确定降低心血管疾病患者出院时虚弱风险的因素至关重要。我们试图验证急性心血管疾病住院患者入院前的爱好与出院时虚弱之间的关系:我们对本院收治的 269 名心血管疾病患者的病例进行了回顾性分析,排除了入院前需要日常生活协助或缺少爱好或虚弱数据的患者。我们记录了患者入院前的爱好(如果有的话),然后将患者分为无爱好组、非活跃爱好组和活跃爱好组。在出院前一天,我们使用心血管健康研究标准(日文版)对患者的虚弱程度进行了评估。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归分析,以研究爱好与虚弱之间的关系:结果:与无爱好组相比,不活跃爱好组的前期虚弱和虚弱几率比(OR)并没有明显降低。相比之下,即使经过调整,爱好活跃组的虚弱前期和虚弱的几率比也明显较低(OR:0.41,95% 置信区间:0.17-0.90)。就虚弱的组成部分而言,与无爱好组相比,有爱好组的步态速度慢、疲惫和体力活动少的OR值较低:结论:即使患者在入院前有爱好,但如果这些爱好并不活跃,也不会降低虚弱的风险,这表明有必要重新考虑住院期间的康复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Delayed Postoperative Rehabilitation on Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Relationship between Physical Function and Quality of Life in Elderly People Requiring Long-term Care. Preoperative Posterior Pelvic Tilt Angle is Associated with Decreased Gait Speed and Hip Function in Older Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis. Refractory Severe Anti-SRP Myopathy that Improved with Long-term Rehabilitation Therapy: A Case Report. Therapeutic Intervention for Trunk Control Impairments in Central Nervous System Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1