Assessment of appropriate use of amylase and lipase testing in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis at an academic teaching hospital.

Valerie Ryholt, Julie Soder, Janet Enderle, Rajkumar Rajendran
{"title":"Assessment of appropriate use of amylase and lipase testing in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis at an academic teaching hospital.","authors":"Valerie Ryholt, Julie Soder, Janet Enderle, Rajkumar Rajendran","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite evidence-based guidelines stating that lipase alone should be used in the diagnosis of suspected acute pancreatitis, health care providers continue to order amylase or amylase and lipase together. The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization of appropriate laboratory testing related to the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a retrospective cross-sectional design. The timeframe was from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. A retrospective chart review was used to collect data for the following: patient-provider encounter notes, patient demographics, provider demographics, differential and final diagnosis, and laboratory test results. Data analysis include stratification of categorical variables and calculation of cost savings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 12-month period, this study found 2567 (9.3%) of all amylase and lipase tests to be unnecessary. Amylase tests (1881; 73.2%) made up the most unnecessary tests followed by lipase tests (686; 26.7%). An analysis of test-ordering behavior by providers revealed that 81.5% of all unnecessary tests were ordered by MDs. Finally, this study estimated a total cost savings of $128,350 if all unnecessary tests were eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that amylase and lipase tests have been overutilized in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"566-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite evidence-based guidelines stating that lipase alone should be used in the diagnosis of suspected acute pancreatitis, health care providers continue to order amylase or amylase and lipase together. The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization of appropriate laboratory testing related to the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Methods: The study used a retrospective cross-sectional design. The timeframe was from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. A retrospective chart review was used to collect data for the following: patient-provider encounter notes, patient demographics, provider demographics, differential and final diagnosis, and laboratory test results. Data analysis include stratification of categorical variables and calculation of cost savings.

Results: For the 12-month period, this study found 2567 (9.3%) of all amylase and lipase tests to be unnecessary. Amylase tests (1881; 73.2%) made up the most unnecessary tests followed by lipase tests (686; 26.7%). An analysis of test-ordering behavior by providers revealed that 81.5% of all unnecessary tests were ordered by MDs. Finally, this study estimated a total cost savings of $128,350 if all unnecessary tests were eliminated.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that amylase and lipase tests have been overutilized in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估一家学术教学医院在诊断急性胰腺炎时对淀粉酶和脂肪酶检测的合理使用。
目的:尽管循证医学指南规定在诊断疑似急性胰腺炎时应单独使用脂肪酶,但医疗服务提供者仍然会同时使用淀粉酶或淀粉酶和脂肪酶。本研究旨在评估与急性胰腺炎诊断相关的适当实验室检测的使用情况:研究采用回顾性横断面设计。时间范围为 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。采用回顾性病历审查收集以下数据:患者-医护人员会诊记录、患者人口统计学资料、医护人员人口统计学资料、鉴别诊断和最终诊断以及实验室检验结果。数据分析包括分类变量的分层和节省费用的计算:本研究发现,在 12 个月期间,有 2567 次(9.3%)淀粉酶和脂肪酶检验是不必要的。淀粉酶检测(1881;73.2%)是最不必要的检测,其次是脂肪酶检测(686;26.7%)。对医疗服务提供者下达化验单行为的分析表明,81.5%的不必要化验单是由医学博士下达的。最后,本研究估计,如果取消所有不必要的检查,总共可节约成本 128,350 美元:我们的研究表明,淀粉酶和脂肪酶检测在急性胰腺炎的诊断中被过度使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory. Evidence-based approach for the generation of a multivariate logistic regression model that predicts instrument failure. Correlation of the abundance of MDSCs, Tregs, PD-1, and PD-L1 with the efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis in gastric cancer. Correction to: The utility of an algorithm based on procalcitonin monitoring in patients with sepsis. Implementing laboratory internal audit to improve compliance and quality of care in the municipal public health system-based ambulatory care health clinics in New York city.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1