Finding the optimal exploration-exploitation trade-off online through Bayesian risk estimation and minimization

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104096
Stewart Jamieson , Jonathan P. How , Yogesh Girdhar
{"title":"Finding the optimal exploration-exploitation trade-off online through Bayesian risk estimation and minimization","authors":"Stewart Jamieson ,&nbsp;Jonathan P. How ,&nbsp;Yogesh Girdhar","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We propose <em>endogenous Bayesian risk minimization</em> (EBRM) over policy sets as an approach to online learning across a wide range of settings. Many real-world online learning problems have complexities such as action- and belief-dependent rewards, time-discounting of reward, and heterogeneous costs for actions and feedback; we find that existing online learning heuristics cannot leverage most problem-specific information, to the detriment of their performance. We introduce a belief-space Markov decision process (BMDP) model that can capture these complexities, and further apply the concepts of <em>aleatoric</em>, <em>epistemic</em>, and <em>process</em> risks to online learning. These risk functions describe the risk inherent to the learning problem, the risk due to the agent's lack of knowledge, and the relative quality of its policy, respectively. We demonstrate how computing and minimizing these risk functions guides the online learning agent towards the optimal exploration-exploitation trade-off in any stochastic online learning problem, constituting the basis of the EBRM approach. We also show how Bayes' risk, the minimization objective in stochastic online learning problems, can be decomposed into the aforementioned aleatoric, epistemic, and process risks.</p><p>In simulation experiments, EBRM algorithms achieve state-of-the-art performance across various classical online learning problems, including Gaussian and Bernoulli multi-armed bandits, best-arm identification, mixed objectives with action- and belief-dependent rewards, and dynamic pricing, a finite partial monitoring problem. To our knowledge, it is also the first computationally efficient online learning approach that can provide online bounds on an algorithm's Bayes' risk. Finally, because the EBRM approach is parameterized by a set of policy algorithms, it can be extended to incorporate new developments in online learning algorithms, and is thus well-suited as the foundation for developing real-world learning agents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 104096"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224000328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose endogenous Bayesian risk minimization (EBRM) over policy sets as an approach to online learning across a wide range of settings. Many real-world online learning problems have complexities such as action- and belief-dependent rewards, time-discounting of reward, and heterogeneous costs for actions and feedback; we find that existing online learning heuristics cannot leverage most problem-specific information, to the detriment of their performance. We introduce a belief-space Markov decision process (BMDP) model that can capture these complexities, and further apply the concepts of aleatoric, epistemic, and process risks to online learning. These risk functions describe the risk inherent to the learning problem, the risk due to the agent's lack of knowledge, and the relative quality of its policy, respectively. We demonstrate how computing and minimizing these risk functions guides the online learning agent towards the optimal exploration-exploitation trade-off in any stochastic online learning problem, constituting the basis of the EBRM approach. We also show how Bayes' risk, the minimization objective in stochastic online learning problems, can be decomposed into the aforementioned aleatoric, epistemic, and process risks.

In simulation experiments, EBRM algorithms achieve state-of-the-art performance across various classical online learning problems, including Gaussian and Bernoulli multi-armed bandits, best-arm identification, mixed objectives with action- and belief-dependent rewards, and dynamic pricing, a finite partial monitoring problem. To our knowledge, it is also the first computationally efficient online learning approach that can provide online bounds on an algorithm's Bayes' risk. Finally, because the EBRM approach is parameterized by a set of policy algorithms, it can be extended to incorporate new developments in online learning algorithms, and is thus well-suited as the foundation for developing real-world learning agents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过贝叶斯风险估计和最小化在线寻找最佳勘探开发权衡方案
我们提出了通过策略集进行在线学习的方法(EBRM)。现实世界中的许多在线学习问题都具有复杂性,例如与行动和信念相关的奖励、奖励的时间折扣以及行动和反馈的异质成本;我们发现,现有的在线学习启发式方法无法利用大多数特定问题的信息,从而影响了其性能。为此,我们引入了能捕捉这些复杂性的信念空间马尔可夫决策过程(BMDP)模型,并进一步将、和风险的概念应用于在线学习。这些风险函数分别描述了学习问题的难度、代理的知识状况及其策略的质量。我们展示了在任何随机在线学习问题中,计算和最小化这些风险函数是如何引导在线学习代理实现最优探索-开发权衡的,这构成了 EBRM 方法的基础。我们还展示了如何将随机在线学习问题中的最小化目标--贝叶斯风险分解为上述可知风险、认识风险和过程风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
期刊最新文献
Lifted action models learning from partial traces Human-AI coevolution Editorial Board Separate but equal: Equality in belief propagation for single-cycle graphs Generative models for grid-based and image-based pathfinding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1