Predictors of Frailty Transitions in Mexican Older Adults.

Ana Rivera-Almaraz, Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez, Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña, Betty Soledad Manrique-Espinoza
{"title":"Predictors of Frailty Transitions in Mexican Older Adults.","authors":"Ana Rivera-Almaraz, Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez, Eduardo Gutiérrez-Peña, Betty Soledad Manrique-Espinoza","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is a dynamic state in older adults. Current evidence, mostly in high-income countries, found that improving frailty is more likely in mild states (prefrailty). We aimed to determine the probability of frailty transitions and their predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were adults aged 50 years or over from the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health in Mexico during 4 waves (2009, 2014, 2017, and 2021). We defined frailty with the frailty phenotype and we used multinomial logistic models to estimate the probabilities of frailty transitions and determine their predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 3 analyzed periods (2009-2014, 2014-2017, and 2017-2021), transition probabilities from frail to robust were higher for the younger age group (50-59 years) at 0.20, 0.26, and 0.20, and lower for the older age group (≥80 years), 0.03, 0.08 and 0.04. Transitioning from prefrail to robust had probabilities of 0.38, 0.37, and 0.35, for the younger age group, and 0.09, 0.18, and 0.10, for the older age group. The probabilities of transitioning to frail and to death were lower for the younger age group and for the robust at baseline; but higher for the older age group and for the frail at baseline. We identified age, disability, and diabetes as the most significant predictors of frailty transitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings show that frailty has a dynamic nature and that a significant proportion of prefrail and frail individuals can recover to a robust or prefrail state. They also emphasize that prefrailty should be the focus of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a dynamic state in older adults. Current evidence, mostly in high-income countries, found that improving frailty is more likely in mild states (prefrailty). We aimed to determine the probability of frailty transitions and their predictors.

Methods: Participants were adults aged 50 years or over from the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health in Mexico during 4 waves (2009, 2014, 2017, and 2021). We defined frailty with the frailty phenotype and we used multinomial logistic models to estimate the probabilities of frailty transitions and determine their predictors.

Results: For the 3 analyzed periods (2009-2014, 2014-2017, and 2017-2021), transition probabilities from frail to robust were higher for the younger age group (50-59 years) at 0.20, 0.26, and 0.20, and lower for the older age group (≥80 years), 0.03, 0.08 and 0.04. Transitioning from prefrail to robust had probabilities of 0.38, 0.37, and 0.35, for the younger age group, and 0.09, 0.18, and 0.10, for the older age group. The probabilities of transitioning to frail and to death were lower for the younger age group and for the robust at baseline; but higher for the older age group and for the frail at baseline. We identified age, disability, and diabetes as the most significant predictors of frailty transitions.

Conclusions: These findings show that frailty has a dynamic nature and that a significant proportion of prefrail and frail individuals can recover to a robust or prefrail state. They also emphasize that prefrailty should be the focus of interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥老年人体弱转变的预测因素。
背景:虚弱是老年人的一种动态状态。目前主要在高收入国家发现的证据表明,在轻度虚弱状态(虚弱前期)下更有可能改善虚弱状况。我们旨在确定虚弱转变的概率及其预测因素:参与者为墨西哥全球老龄化和成人健康研究中 50 岁或以上的成年人,共进行了 4 次研究(2009 年、2014 年、2017 年和 2021 年)。我们用虚弱表型来定义虚弱,并使用多叉逻辑模型来估计虚弱转变的概率并确定其预测因素:在所分析的三个时期(2009-2014 年、2014-2017 年和 2017-2021 年),年轻年龄组(50-59 岁)从虚弱过渡到健壮的概率较高,分别为 0.20、0.26 和 0.20,而老年年龄组(≥80 岁)则较低,分别为 0.03、0.08 和 0.04。在年轻组中,从轻度残疾过渡到重度残疾的概率分别为 0.38、0.37 和 0.35;在老年组中,从轻度残疾过渡到重度残疾的概率分别为 0.09、0.18 和 0.10。基线时,年轻组和健壮组过渡到体弱和死亡的概率较低;但基线时,老年组和体弱组过渡到体弱和死亡的概率较高。我们发现,年龄、残疾和糖尿病是预测虚弱转变的最重要因素:这些研究结果表明,虚弱具有动态性,相当一部分虚弱前和虚弱的人可以恢复到健壮或虚弱前的状态。结论:这些研究结果表明,虚弱具有动态性,相当一部分体弱前期和体弱者可以恢复到健壮或体弱前期状态,这些研究结果还强调,体弱前期应成为干预的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracellular Vesicle MicroRNAs as Predictive Biomarkers in Postoperative Delirium After Spine Surgery: Preliminary Study. Effect of Hearing Intervention Versus Health Education Control on Fatigue: A Secondary Analysis of the ACHIEVE Study. Overexpression of TIAM2S, a Critical Regulator for the Hippocampal-Medial Prefrontal Cortex Network, Progresses Age-Related Spatial Memory Impairment. Comparative Study of Antioxidant Activity of Dextran-Coated Iron Oxide, Gold, and Silver Nanoparticles Against Age-Induced Oxidative Stress in Erythrocytes. A Tale of 2 Experiences: Navigating End-of-Life Care With a History of Incarceration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1