The role of a boundary object in legitimacy-making strategies for food waste innovation: the perspective of emergent circular supply chains

Quynh Do, Nishikant Mishra, Fernando Correia, Stephen Eldridge
{"title":"The role of a boundary object in legitimacy-making strategies for food waste innovation: the perspective of emergent circular supply chains","authors":"Quynh Do, Nishikant Mishra, Fernando Correia, Stephen Eldridge","doi":"10.1108/scm-01-2023-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Circular economy advocates innovations that upcycle wastes in the food supply chain to generate high added-value materials. These innovations are not only disruptive and green but also they are often initiated by startups, leading to the emergence of novel open-loop supply chains connecting actors in food and non-food sectors. While earlier research has highlighted the need to seek legitimacy for disruptive innovations to survive and grow, little is known about how these innovations occur and evolve across sectors. This paper aims to elaborate on this mechanism by exploring the function of the circular economy as a boundary object to facilitate legitimacy-seeking strategies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An exploratory multiple-case research design is adopted and features food waste innovation projects with multi-tier supply chains consisting of a food producer, a startup and a buying firm. The study is investigated from the legitimacy and boundary object lenses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings proposed a framework for the role of a boundary object in enabling legitimacy-seeking strategies for novel food waste innovations. First, the interpretative flexibility of the circular economy affords actors symbolic resources to conduct manipulation strategy to achieve cognitive legitimacy. Second, small-scale work arrangements enable creation strategy for the new supply chain to harness moral legitimacy. Finally, pragmatic legitimacy is granted via diffusion strategy enabled by scalable work arrangements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper provides novel insights into the emergence of food waste innovation from a multi-tier supply chain perspective. It also highlights the key role of the boundary object in the legitimacy-seeking process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":30468,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-01-2023-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Circular economy advocates innovations that upcycle wastes in the food supply chain to generate high added-value materials. These innovations are not only disruptive and green but also they are often initiated by startups, leading to the emergence of novel open-loop supply chains connecting actors in food and non-food sectors. While earlier research has highlighted the need to seek legitimacy for disruptive innovations to survive and grow, little is known about how these innovations occur and evolve across sectors. This paper aims to elaborate on this mechanism by exploring the function of the circular economy as a boundary object to facilitate legitimacy-seeking strategies.

Design/methodology/approach

An exploratory multiple-case research design is adopted and features food waste innovation projects with multi-tier supply chains consisting of a food producer, a startup and a buying firm. The study is investigated from the legitimacy and boundary object lenses.

Findings

The findings proposed a framework for the role of a boundary object in enabling legitimacy-seeking strategies for novel food waste innovations. First, the interpretative flexibility of the circular economy affords actors symbolic resources to conduct manipulation strategy to achieve cognitive legitimacy. Second, small-scale work arrangements enable creation strategy for the new supply chain to harness moral legitimacy. Finally, pragmatic legitimacy is granted via diffusion strategy enabled by scalable work arrangements.

Originality/value

This paper provides novel insights into the emergence of food waste innovation from a multi-tier supply chain perspective. It also highlights the key role of the boundary object in the legitimacy-seeking process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边界客体在食物垃圾创新合法性战略中的作用:新兴循环供应链的视角
目的循环经济倡导创新,将食品供应链中的废弃物循环利用,产生高附加值材料。这些创新不仅是颠覆性的、绿色的,而且往往是由初创企业发起的,从而形成了连接食品和非食品行业参与者的新型开放式循环供应链。虽然早期的研究强调了颠覆性创新需要寻求合法性才能生存和发展,但人们对这些创新是如何发生和跨行业发展的却知之甚少。本文旨在通过探索循环经济作为促进寻求合法性战略的边界对象的功能,对这一机制进行阐述。设计/方法/途径本文采用探索性多案例研究设计,以食品生产商、初创企业和采购公司组成的多层供应链中的食品废物创新项目为特色。研究结果研究结果提出了一个关于边界客体在促进新型食物浪费创新的合法性寻求战略中的作用的框架。首先,循环经济在解释上的灵活性为行动者提供了象征性资源,使其能够实施操作策略以实现认知合法性。其次,小规模的工作安排使新供应链的创造战略能够利用道德合法性。最后,通过可扩展的工作安排实现扩散战略,从而获得实用合法性。它还强调了边界对象在寻求合法性过程中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Matching supply chain management challenges with blockchain applications Uncovering effects of supply chain distance on sustainability adoption: empirical evidence from a multi-stakeholder partnership Digitalisation in food supply chains to build resilience from disruptive events: a combined dynamic capabilities and knowledge-based view Different paths to improving together: a taxonomy of buyer-supplier collaborations for sustainability in food supply networks Networked business models on a nascent market for sustainable innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1