{"title":"How the three lines of defense can contribute to public firms’ cybersecurity effectiveness","authors":"","doi":"10.1057/s41310-024-00226-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This interpretative field study examines how public firms deal with cybersecurity-related issues, emphasizing how the three lines of defense can contribute to cybersecurity effectiveness. Sixteen interviews were conducted with 18 participants, including 13 executives/senior managers in internal audit, information technology (IT), and information security (IS) in 13 different public firms. The many cybersecurity structures, processes, or relational mechanisms established by the three lines of defense in the participating organizations are identified. These governance mechanisms are used as a baseline for analyzing how teams in internal audit, IT, IS, cybersecurity, legal, finance, corporate communications, and environmental, social and governance (ESG) are engaged and collaborate in dealing with cybersecurity-related issues. This study entered into the “black box” to document how different organizational functions are involved in IT/IS governance mechanisms associated with cybersecurity. Findings can help board of directors and management reflect on the nature of cybersecurity activities that could be implemented to enhance cybersecurity effectiveness. Regulators may consider the issues raised by participants to clarify regulations about cybersecurity disclosure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45050,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disclosure and Governance","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disclosure and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00226-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This interpretative field study examines how public firms deal with cybersecurity-related issues, emphasizing how the three lines of defense can contribute to cybersecurity effectiveness. Sixteen interviews were conducted with 18 participants, including 13 executives/senior managers in internal audit, information technology (IT), and information security (IS) in 13 different public firms. The many cybersecurity structures, processes, or relational mechanisms established by the three lines of defense in the participating organizations are identified. These governance mechanisms are used as a baseline for analyzing how teams in internal audit, IT, IS, cybersecurity, legal, finance, corporate communications, and environmental, social and governance (ESG) are engaged and collaborate in dealing with cybersecurity-related issues. This study entered into the “black box” to document how different organizational functions are involved in IT/IS governance mechanisms associated with cybersecurity. Findings can help board of directors and management reflect on the nature of cybersecurity activities that could be implemented to enhance cybersecurity effectiveness. Regulators may consider the issues raised by participants to clarify regulations about cybersecurity disclosure.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disclosure and Governance publishes a balance between academic and practitioner perspectives in law and accounting on subjects related to corporate governance and disclosure. In its emphasis on practical issues, it is the only such journal in these fields. All rigorous and thoughtful conceptual papers are encouraged.
To date, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance has published articles by a former general counsel and a former commissioner of the SEC, practitioners from Cleary Gottlieb, Skadden Arps, Wachtell Lipton, and Latham & Watkins as well as articles by academics from Harvard, Yale and NYU. The readership of the journal includes lawyers, accountants, and corporate directors and managers.