Youth-Led Research and the Tensions Between Relational Methodologies and Fast Methods: Learning and Living in the In-Between

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1177/15327086231224757
Meagan Call-Cummings, Bethany Monea, Giovanni P. Dazzo, Amy L. Best, Natale Gray, Oaklen Kalinichenko, Widad Khalid, Jeffery Keller, Khaseem Davis
{"title":"Youth-Led Research and the Tensions Between Relational Methodologies and Fast Methods: Learning and Living in the In-Between","authors":"Meagan Call-Cummings, Bethany Monea, Giovanni P. Dazzo, Amy L. Best, Natale Gray, Oaklen Kalinichenko, Widad Khalid, Jeffery Keller, Khaseem Davis","doi":"10.1177/15327086231224757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) has often been characterized as a meaningful way of including young people in research about and for them. Much has been written about the need to develop trusting relationships between adult and youth researchers in this process. These types of research relationships take time to develop authentically and we see a need for that relationship-building time to be built into research designs and timelines. At the same time, in our experience working with the Youth Research Council in Northern Virginia, USA, we have seen youth researchers express desires to use “rapid” research methods, such as hallway interviews, text messaging, speak-back surveys, and video testimonials to gather data from peers. The purpose of this article is to explore these tensions, to uncover the privilege of what have been called slow ontologies, and to offer recommendations for other youth-led research teams.","PeriodicalId":46996,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086231224757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) has often been characterized as a meaningful way of including young people in research about and for them. Much has been written about the need to develop trusting relationships between adult and youth researchers in this process. These types of research relationships take time to develop authentically and we see a need for that relationship-building time to be built into research designs and timelines. At the same time, in our experience working with the Youth Research Council in Northern Virginia, USA, we have seen youth researchers express desires to use “rapid” research methods, such as hallway interviews, text messaging, speak-back surveys, and video testimonials to gather data from peers. The purpose of this article is to explore these tensions, to uncover the privilege of what have been called slow ontologies, and to offer recommendations for other youth-led research teams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青年主导的研究以及关系方法论与快速方法之间的紧张关系:在两者之间学习和生活
青年参与行动研究(YPAR)通常被认为是让青年人参与有关他们和为他们进行的研究 的一种有意义的方式。在这一过程中,成人研究人员和青年研究人员之间需要建立相互信任的关系,这方面的文章已经写了很多。这些类型的研究关系需要时间才能真正建立起来,我们认为有必要在研究设计和时间安排中加入建立关系的时间。同时,根据我们与美国北弗吉尼亚州青年研究委员会的合作经验,我们看到青年研究人员表达了使用 "快速 "研究方法的愿望,如走廊访谈、短信、回话调查和视频见证等,以便从同伴那里收集数据。本文旨在探讨这些紧张关系,揭示所谓 "慢本体论 "的特权,并为其他青年领导的研究团队提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The mandate for this interdisciplinary, international journal is to move methods talk in cultural studies to the forefront, into the regions of moral, ethical and political discourse. The commitment to imagine a more democratic society has been sa guiding feature of cultural studies from the very beginnnig. Contributors to this journal understand that the discourses of a critical, moral methodology are basic to any effort to re-engage the promise of the social sciences and the humanities for democracy in the 21st Century. We seek works that connect critical emanicipatory theories to new forms of social justice and democratic practice are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Rising Authoritarian Practice in Early Childhood Curriculum: A Case Study Corrigendum to “Methodologizing Transnationality: Relational Writing as Collective Inquiry” Complex Considerations for Critical Qualitative Childhood Studies: A Perspective From Aotearoa (New Zealand) Emergent Life: Opening Our Lives to Differenciation and to Response-Ability, as We Turn Our Critical Gaze on the Enunciative Regularities That Hold the World the Same Data Embargoes as a Tool for Emplacement and Displacement of Children in Early Childhood Classrooms: A Comparative Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1