Comparison of Descriptive Assessment and Trial-Based Functional Analysis as the Basis of Treatment in Homes

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1177/10883576241230929
Lisa M. Tereshko, Mary Jane Weiss, Justin B. Leaf, Thomas Marsh, George McClure
{"title":"Comparison of Descriptive Assessment and Trial-Based Functional Analysis as the Basis of Treatment in Homes","authors":"Lisa M. Tereshko, Mary Jane Weiss, Justin B. Leaf, Thomas Marsh, George McClure","doi":"10.1177/10883576241230929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective treatment of challenging behaviors in young children with autism spectrum disorder requires identifying consequences that maintain the behavior under specific environmental circumstances. Assessment strategies help to identify environmental factors setting the occasion for the behaviors to continue to occur. Many studies have used antecedent–behavior–consequence (ABC) data collection strategies, but few have examined its ability to effectively identify the function. Research supports the use of the trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) but few studies examine its effectiveness in the home setting. The current study attempted to answer which assessments might work best in the home setting. Treatment was implemented for each participant based on the results of their assessments. All assessments identified the function of behavior as verified by function-based treatments, but the ABC assessment identified additional functions for three of the participants while the TBFA was more precise. Implications and limitations are reviewed, along with future directions for behavioral assessment in the home.","PeriodicalId":12133,"journal":{"name":"Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576241230929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective treatment of challenging behaviors in young children with autism spectrum disorder requires identifying consequences that maintain the behavior under specific environmental circumstances. Assessment strategies help to identify environmental factors setting the occasion for the behaviors to continue to occur. Many studies have used antecedent–behavior–consequence (ABC) data collection strategies, but few have examined its ability to effectively identify the function. Research supports the use of the trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) but few studies examine its effectiveness in the home setting. The current study attempted to answer which assessments might work best in the home setting. Treatment was implemented for each participant based on the results of their assessments. All assessments identified the function of behavior as verified by function-based treatments, but the ABC assessment identified additional functions for three of the participants while the TBFA was more precise. Implications and limitations are reviewed, along with future directions for behavioral assessment in the home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较描述性评估和基于试验的功能分析作为家庭治疗的基础
要有效治疗患有自闭症谱系障碍的幼儿的挑战性行为,就必须找出在特定环境条件下维持这种行为的后果。评估策略有助于识别为行为持续发生创造条件的环境因素。许多研究都使用了前因后果(ABC)数据收集策略,但很少有研究对其有效识别功能的能力进行研究。研究支持使用基于试验的功能分析(TBFA),但很少有研究考察其在家庭环境中的有效性。本研究试图回答在家庭环境中哪种评估方法最有效。根据评估结果对每位参与者实施治疗。所有评估都确定了行为的功能,并通过基于功能的治疗进行了验证,但 ABC 评估为其中三名参与者确定了额外的功能,而 TBFA 评估则更为精确。本文回顾了评估的意义和局限性,以及家庭行为评估的未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities addresses issues concerning individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities and their families. Manuscripts reflect a wide range of disciplines, including education, psychology, psychiatry, medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech/language pathology, social work, and related areas. The journal’s editorial staff seeks manuscripts from diverse philosophical and theoretical positions.
期刊最新文献
Generalization of Self-Instructional Behaviors to Perform Exercise Routines for Elementary Students With Intellectual Disability A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Technology-Aided Reading Interventions for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder Using the “Cool Versus Not Cool” Discrimination Procedure to Teach Social Skills Remotely to Adults With Autism Preschool Special Educators’ Exposure to and Use of Evidence-Based and Low-Value Practices for Children with Autism Effects of Embedding Special Interest Area in Instruction on the Engagement and Out-of-Seat Behaviors of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1