Opening the black box of works council–management team interaction: Germany and the Netherlands compared

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Economic and Industrial Democracy Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1177/0143831x241228481
Annette van den Berg, Yolanda Grift, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, Saraï Sapulete, Martin Behrens, Wolfram Brehmer
{"title":"Opening the black box of works council–management team interaction: Germany and the Netherlands compared","authors":"Annette van den Berg, Yolanda Grift, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, Saraï Sapulete, Martin Behrens, Wolfram Brehmer","doi":"10.1177/0143831x241228481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers still struggle with unravelling the internal interaction processes between management and employees (and their representatives). In empirical studies explaining the effects of works councils, the multidimensional nature of the works council–management team relationship is therefore largely ignored. By utilising a unique questionnaire among works councillors, this article examines the (potential) inner workings of this black box, by developing a construct aimed to capture the essence of these forms of social interaction. The authors find that behavioural aspects of cooperation, power, communication, goal sharing and trust significantly affect the relationship between works council and management. The authors also test their construct via a model that seeks to explain the influence of works councils on company decision-making. Their results indicate that despite a few noticeable cross-country differences, their black box construct is the most important factor in explaining this influence both in Germany and the Netherlands, revealing that a good relationship with management is imperative.","PeriodicalId":47456,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x241228481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers still struggle with unravelling the internal interaction processes between management and employees (and their representatives). In empirical studies explaining the effects of works councils, the multidimensional nature of the works council–management team relationship is therefore largely ignored. By utilising a unique questionnaire among works councillors, this article examines the (potential) inner workings of this black box, by developing a construct aimed to capture the essence of these forms of social interaction. The authors find that behavioural aspects of cooperation, power, communication, goal sharing and trust significantly affect the relationship between works council and management. The authors also test their construct via a model that seeks to explain the influence of works councils on company decision-making. Their results indicate that despite a few noticeable cross-country differences, their black box construct is the most important factor in explaining this influence both in Germany and the Netherlands, revealing that a good relationship with management is imperative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打开职代会与管理团队互动的黑匣子:德国与荷兰的比较
研究人员仍在努力揭示管理层与雇员(及其代表)之间的内部互动过程。因此,在解释劳资协议会影响的实证研究中,劳资协议会与管理团队关系的多维性在很大程度上被忽视了。本文利用一份独特的工委会委员调查问卷,研究了这一黑箱的(潜在)内部运作,提出了一个旨在捕捉这些社会互动形式本质的概念。作者发现,合作、权力、沟通、目标分享和信任等行为方面对工委会与管理层之间的关系有重大影响。作者还通过一个模型检验了他们的构想,该模型旨在解释劳资协议会对公司决策的影响。他们的研究结果表明,尽管存在一些明显的跨国差异,但在德国和荷兰,他们的黑箱理论是解释这种影响的最重要因素,揭示了与管理层保持良好关系的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Economic and Industrial Democracy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Economic and Industrial Democracy is an international peer reviewed journal that focuses on the study of initiatives designed to enhance the quality of working life through extending the democratic control of workers over the workplace and the economy. How those initiatives are affected by wider political, economic and technological factors are also of interest. Special emphasis is laid on international coverage of empirical material, including discussions of the social and economic conditions in various countries.
期刊最新文献
The employee representation plan movement in the United States 1913–1935: The attempted legitimation of novel organizational forms Neoliberalism by stealth? Labour reforms and institutional discontinuity in worker representation in France Crafting alternative work organisations: Paradoxes of workplace democracy and emancipation in worker-buyout cooperatives The union default: Increasing union membership by facilitating the experience of unionism and overcoming the role of inertia Elucidating the relationship between high-investment HR systems and workforce engagement: The role of employee education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1