An athlete's perspective: Comparing talent development environments for boys and girls in Western Australia youth soccer

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1177/17479541241231363
Mikayla J Lyons, Jenny A Conlon, Sophia Nimphius, Brad S Keller, Christopher Joyce
{"title":"An athlete's perspective: Comparing talent development environments for boys and girls in Western Australia youth soccer","authors":"Mikayla J Lyons, Jenny A Conlon, Sophia Nimphius, Brad S Keller, Christopher Joyce","doi":"10.1177/17479541241231363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare the perceptions of boys and girls regarding their gender-specific talent development environments (TDEs) in state-level youth soccer. Seventy-one players (girls, n = 35; boys, n = 36) aged 11–18 years completed the Talent Development Environment Questionnaire (TDEQ-5), Sports Motivation Scale (SMS-6), Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q), and Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancies (SEOE) of strength training questionnaire. Mann–Whitney U tests and Hedges’s g effect sizes were used to identify group differences. Boys scored higher for TDEQ-5 subdimensions: long-term development focus, alignment of expectations, and holistic quality preparation. For the CART-Q, boys perceived greater coach commitment, whilst girls perceived greater coach complementarity. The SMS-6 results suggested higher amotivation among girls and higher external regulation and introjected regulation among boys. Finally, boys reported greater self-efficacy and outcome expectancies related to strength training. Overall, the findings reveal significant disparities in boys’ and girls’ perceptions of their TDEs. Whilst these findings provide a more nuanced understanding of youth soccer TDEs, further research is necessary to identify the critical factors for effective athlete development regardless of gender, or with more informed considerations of gender. Stakeholders should consider the unique constraints and resources specific to their TDE to determine which strategies may best impact their functionality.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241231363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the perceptions of boys and girls regarding their gender-specific talent development environments (TDEs) in state-level youth soccer. Seventy-one players (girls, n = 35; boys, n = 36) aged 11–18 years completed the Talent Development Environment Questionnaire (TDEQ-5), Sports Motivation Scale (SMS-6), Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q), and Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancies (SEOE) of strength training questionnaire. Mann–Whitney U tests and Hedges’s g effect sizes were used to identify group differences. Boys scored higher for TDEQ-5 subdimensions: long-term development focus, alignment of expectations, and holistic quality preparation. For the CART-Q, boys perceived greater coach commitment, whilst girls perceived greater coach complementarity. The SMS-6 results suggested higher amotivation among girls and higher external regulation and introjected regulation among boys. Finally, boys reported greater self-efficacy and outcome expectancies related to strength training. Overall, the findings reveal significant disparities in boys’ and girls’ perceptions of their TDEs. Whilst these findings provide a more nuanced understanding of youth soccer TDEs, further research is necessary to identify the critical factors for effective athlete development regardless of gender, or with more informed considerations of gender. Stakeholders should consider the unique constraints and resources specific to their TDE to determine which strategies may best impact their functionality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动员的视角:比较西澳大利亚青少年足球队中男孩和女孩的人才培养环境
本研究旨在比较州级青少年足球比赛中男孩和女孩对其性别特有的天赋发展环境(TDE)的看法。71 名 11-18 岁的球员(女孩,35 人;男孩,36 人)完成了天赋发展环境问卷 (TDEQ-5)、运动动机量表 (SMS-6)、教练与运动员关系问卷 (CART-Q) 以及力量训练自我效能和结果预期 (SEOE) 问卷。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Hedges's g 效应量来确定组间差异。男生在 TDEQ-5 的子维度上得分更高:长期发展重点、期望一致性和整体素质准备。在 CART-Q 中,男生认为教练的承诺性更高,而女生则认为教练的互补性更高。SMS-6 的结果表明,女生的非激励性更高,男生的外部调节和内部调节更高。最后,男生对力量训练的自我效能感和结果预期更高。总之,研究结果表明,男生和女生对其训练、发展和评估的看法存在显著差异。尽管这些研究结果让我们对青少年足球的 "训练、教育和发展 "有了更细致的了解,但仍有必要开展进一步的研究,以确定运动员有效发展的关键因素,而不论其性别如何,或在考虑性别因素时更有依据。利益相关者应考虑其训练、教育和培训中心特有的制约因素和资源,以确定哪些策略可对其功能产生最佳影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.
期刊最新文献
Impact of coach education on coaching effectiveness in youth sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis Insights into coaching effectiveness: Perspectives from coaches and players in South African Women's Rugby A principled approach to skill acquisition in competitive surfing: Embracing representative learning design Effects of coaches' authentic leadership on athletes' training competition satisfaction: The mediating roles of psychological ownership and athlete engagement Training volume, intensity, and performance of world-class Chinese rowers prior to the 2019 world championships: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1