Vitamin D fortification of foods – sensory, acceptability, cost, and public acceptance considerations

IF 2.5 2区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106494
Kevin D. Cashman
{"title":"Vitamin D fortification of foods – sensory, acceptability, cost, and public acceptance considerations","authors":"Kevin D. Cashman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In terms of vitamin D food fortification, there are a number of important considerations in relation to selection of the food vehicle and fortificant. While there has been much research focus on the ability of fortified foods to improve vitamin D status, other considerations, such as sensory properties and acceptability, cost, and public attitudes around vitamin D-fortified foods, have received less attention. Thus, the present narrative review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge around these important considerations. In summary, its findings suggest that: i) vitamin D addition to various food vehicles, at levels consistent with the supply of part or all the recommended intake, does not alter their sensory characteristics or overall acceptability; ii) overall, vitamin D fortification of foods is relatively cost-effective, despite the fact that some attitudinal studies highlighted participant concerns about the potential cost/expense of vitamin D-fortified foods; iii) evidence from various attitudinal studies suggest a high level of acceptance and/or purchase intention (i.e., extent to which customers are willing and inclined to buy) of vitamin D-fortified food products by the general public; and iv) there have been repeated calls for vitamin D public health educational/information campaigns to help educate consumers about the health risks associated with vitamin D deficiency and nutritional benefits associated with consumption of vitamin D-fortified foods. Such campaigns could positively mediate attitudes and acceptance of vitamin D-fortified foods amongst the public, and could also help address misconceptions and allay fears around vitamin D for concerned individuals. Lastly, the findings of the present review also highlight the existence of between-country differences, even within Europe, in relation to attitudes and purchase intention of vitamin D-fortified foods and the perceived appropriateness of certain food vehicles for vitamin D fortification, as well as the best mix of communication channels for a vitamin D public health educational/information campaign.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 106494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076024000426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In terms of vitamin D food fortification, there are a number of important considerations in relation to selection of the food vehicle and fortificant. While there has been much research focus on the ability of fortified foods to improve vitamin D status, other considerations, such as sensory properties and acceptability, cost, and public attitudes around vitamin D-fortified foods, have received less attention. Thus, the present narrative review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge around these important considerations. In summary, its findings suggest that: i) vitamin D addition to various food vehicles, at levels consistent with the supply of part or all the recommended intake, does not alter their sensory characteristics or overall acceptability; ii) overall, vitamin D fortification of foods is relatively cost-effective, despite the fact that some attitudinal studies highlighted participant concerns about the potential cost/expense of vitamin D-fortified foods; iii) evidence from various attitudinal studies suggest a high level of acceptance and/or purchase intention (i.e., extent to which customers are willing and inclined to buy) of vitamin D-fortified food products by the general public; and iv) there have been repeated calls for vitamin D public health educational/information campaigns to help educate consumers about the health risks associated with vitamin D deficiency and nutritional benefits associated with consumption of vitamin D-fortified foods. Such campaigns could positively mediate attitudes and acceptance of vitamin D-fortified foods amongst the public, and could also help address misconceptions and allay fears around vitamin D for concerned individuals. Lastly, the findings of the present review also highlight the existence of between-country differences, even within Europe, in relation to attitudes and purchase intention of vitamin D-fortified foods and the perceived appropriateness of certain food vehicles for vitamin D fortification, as well as the best mix of communication channels for a vitamin D public health educational/information campaign.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化食品中的维生素 D--感官、可接受性、成本和公众接受度方面的考虑因素
就维生素 D 食品强化而言,在选择食品载体和强化剂方面有许多重要的考虑因素。尽管许多研究都关注强化食品改善维生素 D 状态的能力,但其他考虑因素,如感官特性和可接受性、成本以及公众对维生素 D 强化食品的态度,却较少受到关注。因此,本综述旨在总结有关这些重要考虑因素的现有知识。综上所述,其研究结果表明:i) 在各种食品中添加维生素 D(添加量与部分或全部推荐摄入量相一致)不会改变其感官特性或总体可接受性;ii) 尽管一些态度研究强调了参与者对维生素 D 强化食品潜在成本/费用的担忧,但总体而言,食品中添加维生素 D 的成本效益相对较高;iii) 来自各种态度研究的证据表明,人们对维生素 D 强化食品的接受程度和/或购买意向(即:顾客愿意和倾向于购买维生素 D 强化食品的程度)较高、iv) 人们一再呼吁开展维生素 D 公共卫生教育/宣传活动,帮助消费者了解维生素 D 缺乏对健康的危害以及食用维生素 D 强化食品对营养的益处。这种宣传活动可以积极调解公众对维生素 D强化食品的态度和接受程度,还有助于消除误解,减轻相关人员对维生素 D 的恐惧。最后,本综述的研究结果还突显出,即使是在欧洲,不同国家对维生素 D 强化食品的态度和购买意向也存在差异,人们认为某些食品是否适合作为维生素 D 强化的载体,以及维生素 D 公共健康教育/宣传活动的最佳传播渠道组合也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology is devoted to new experimental and theoretical developments in areas related to steroids including vitamin D, lipids and their metabolomics. The Journal publishes a variety of contributions, including original articles, general and focused reviews, and rapid communications (brief articles of particular interest and clear novelty). Selected cutting-edge topics will be addressed in Special Issues managed by Guest Editors. Special Issues will contain both commissioned reviews and original research papers to provide comprehensive coverage of specific topics, and all submissions will undergo rigorous peer-review prior to publication.
期刊最新文献
A novel thiadiazole-steroid hybrid as a CYP19A1 inhibitor: Synthesis, molecular interaction analysis and assessment of steroid receptor signaling Serendipity, steroids and science Interplay between 7-ketocholesterol and tamoxifen shapes stress responses in breast cancer cells Emerging role of 7-Ketocholesterol and hydroxylated 7-Ketocholesterol in the pathophysiology of disease Characterization of an NADPH-dependent 17ɑ-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase encoded by the desF gene from the gut bacterium Clostridium scindens VPI 12708
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1