Cultural Intermediation and Civil Society: Towards a Hermeneutically Strong Conception

IF 1.4 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Cultural Sociology Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1177/17499755241228891
Marcel Knöchelmann
{"title":"Cultural Intermediation and Civil Society: Towards a Hermeneutically Strong Conception","authors":"Marcel Knöchelmann","doi":"10.1177/17499755241228891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literary fiction narrates ethical and moral meaning. It is rich with ethical conceptions of the good life and expressions of moral universalism, and it assumes a meaningful role in civil society through this richness. And yet, existing conceptions of cultural intermediation do not consider this richness; they are reductive in the way they focus on the social-structural space in between author and reader. Cultural intermediation is trimmed down to competition and generalizations of taste and aesthetic acclaim without considering cultural meaningfulness. In this article, I propose and discuss a new conception of cultural intermediation that builds a bridge between understanding the production and reception of literature in social-structural terms and society’s civil discourse. I draw on a diverse set of authors from philosophy and cultural sociology – discourse ethics and civil sphere theory in particular – to form a critique of intermediation. I conceptualize what it means to claim that literary text is a morally meaningful medium in three different ways: productive intermediation, receptive intermediation and critical intermediation. And I highlight that literary fiction is not culture per se, but that it enables actors to mediate culture. From authors along with agents, publishers, distributors and critics towards readers, literary text is embedded in culture-specific context. This is a hermeneutically strong conception of cultural intermediation that contributes to a meaning-centred sociology of literature.","PeriodicalId":46722,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755241228891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literary fiction narrates ethical and moral meaning. It is rich with ethical conceptions of the good life and expressions of moral universalism, and it assumes a meaningful role in civil society through this richness. And yet, existing conceptions of cultural intermediation do not consider this richness; they are reductive in the way they focus on the social-structural space in between author and reader. Cultural intermediation is trimmed down to competition and generalizations of taste and aesthetic acclaim without considering cultural meaningfulness. In this article, I propose and discuss a new conception of cultural intermediation that builds a bridge between understanding the production and reception of literature in social-structural terms and society’s civil discourse. I draw on a diverse set of authors from philosophy and cultural sociology – discourse ethics and civil sphere theory in particular – to form a critique of intermediation. I conceptualize what it means to claim that literary text is a morally meaningful medium in three different ways: productive intermediation, receptive intermediation and critical intermediation. And I highlight that literary fiction is not culture per se, but that it enables actors to mediate culture. From authors along with agents, publishers, distributors and critics towards readers, literary text is embedded in culture-specific context. This is a hermeneutically strong conception of cultural intermediation that contributes to a meaning-centred sociology of literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化中介与公民社会:迈向诠释学上的强势概念
文学小说叙述伦理道德意义。它蕴含着丰富的关于美好生活的伦理观念和道德普遍性的表达,并通过这种丰富性在公民社会中发挥着有意义的作用。然而,现有的文化中介概念并没有考虑到这种丰富性;它们只关注作者与读者之间的社会结构空间,是一种还原性的概念。文化中介被简化为品味和审美赞誉的竞争和概括,而不考虑文化的意义性。在本文中,我提出并讨论了一种新的文化中介概念,它在从社会结构角度理解文学的生产和接受与社会公民话语之间架起了一座桥梁。我从哲学和文化社会学--尤其是话语伦理学和公民领域理论--的不同作者那里汲取营养,形成了对中介的批判。我从生产性中介、接受性中介和批判性中介这三个不同方面,对声称文学文本是一种具有道德意义的媒介的含义进行了概念化。我强调文学小说本身并不是文化,但它能使参与者对文化进行中介。从作者到代理商、出版商、发行商和评论家,再到读者,文学文本都嵌入了特定的文化语境。这是一种诠释学上强有力的文化中介概念,有助于建立以意义为中心的文学社会学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Sociology
Cultural Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Cultural Sociology publishes empirically oriented, theoretically sophisticated, methodologically rigorous papers, which explore from a broad set of sociological perspectives a diverse range of socio-cultural forces, phenomena, institutions and contexts. The objective of Cultural Sociology is to publish original articles which advance the field of cultural sociology and the sociology of culture. The journal seeks to consolidate, develop and promote the arena of sociological understandings of culture, and is intended to be pivotal in defining both what this arena is like currently and what it could become in the future. Cultural Sociology will publish innovative, sociologically-informed work concerned with cultural processes and artefacts, broadly defined.
期刊最新文献
Educational Mobility and Cultural Omnivorousness in Germany Exploring Digital/Non-digital Entanglements Through Everyday Practice Connections in Young People’s Gaming Who is on Show? Globalization of Private Contemporary Art Museums in China The Activist Character: Power and Empowerment in Bestselling Activist Memoirs in the United States Reactionary Exiles. How Conspiracy Theorists Deal with Socio-Technological Exclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1