Antecedents of knowledge management: The case of professional employees in Indonesia

Nur Laily, Hindah Mustika, S. Irdiana, R. Rusdiyanto, Marto Silalahi
{"title":"Antecedents of knowledge management: The case of professional employees in Indonesia","authors":"Nur Laily, Hindah Mustika, S. Irdiana, R. Rusdiyanto, Marto Silalahi","doi":"10.21511/kpm.08(1).2024.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate and test the impact of knowledge, trust, unity, and self-efficacy on knowledge management of employees in Indonesian businesses in the education sector. This empirical study also examines the relationship between knowledge management among employees in Indonesian education sector businesses and conformity through knowledge self-efficacy, trust, and unity. A quantitative causality technique was employed in the study using a sample of workers from Indonesian companies involved in the education sector (at least 35 years old and engaged). The primary data consisted of 220 replies from respondents with varying educational backgrounds. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling software was used to analyze the data. The Likert scale is used to determine each answer’s value. Empirical evidence shows that knowledge self-efficacy does not affect the knowledge management of employees in these companies (T Statistics = 0.992); on the other hand, knowledge self-efficacy influences conformity, harmony, and confidence, which in turn affects the knowledge management of employees in these companies. The indirect effect demonstrates that agreement can moderate the influence of knowledge self-efficacy on the knowledge management of employees in these companies (T Statistics = 5,959); conversely, conformity mediates the strong impact of trust on the knowledge management of employees in these businesses. The empirical results show that employees need to have a high level of knowledge for diverse expertise to function well. Conversely, trust will make people more eager to share their information. Lack of confidence might impede the dissemination of knowledge.\nAcknowledgment We acknowledge the partial publication funding provided by Indonesia school of Economic (STIESIA), Surabaya, Indonesia","PeriodicalId":179091,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Performance Management","volume":"10 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(1).2024.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and test the impact of knowledge, trust, unity, and self-efficacy on knowledge management of employees in Indonesian businesses in the education sector. This empirical study also examines the relationship between knowledge management among employees in Indonesian education sector businesses and conformity through knowledge self-efficacy, trust, and unity. A quantitative causality technique was employed in the study using a sample of workers from Indonesian companies involved in the education sector (at least 35 years old and engaged). The primary data consisted of 220 replies from respondents with varying educational backgrounds. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling software was used to analyze the data. The Likert scale is used to determine each answer’s value. Empirical evidence shows that knowledge self-efficacy does not affect the knowledge management of employees in these companies (T Statistics = 0.992); on the other hand, knowledge self-efficacy influences conformity, harmony, and confidence, which in turn affects the knowledge management of employees in these companies. The indirect effect demonstrates that agreement can moderate the influence of knowledge self-efficacy on the knowledge management of employees in these companies (T Statistics = 5,959); conversely, conformity mediates the strong impact of trust on the knowledge management of employees in these businesses. The empirical results show that employees need to have a high level of knowledge for diverse expertise to function well. Conversely, trust will make people more eager to share their information. Lack of confidence might impede the dissemination of knowledge. Acknowledgment We acknowledge the partial publication funding provided by Indonesia school of Economic (STIESIA), Surabaya, Indonesia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识管理的先决条件:印度尼西亚专业雇员的案例
本研究旨在评估和检验知识、信任、团结和自我效能对印尼教育行业企业员工知识管理的影响。本实证研究还通过知识自我效能感、信任和团结,探讨了印尼教育部门企业员工的知识管理与一致性之间的关系。本研究采用了定量因果关系技术,以印尼教育部门企业的员工(至少 35 岁且从事教育工作)为样本。主要数据包括来自不同教育背景受访者的 220 份答复。数据分析使用了偏最小二乘法结构方程模型软件。采用李克特量表确定每个答案的数值。经验证据表明,知识自我效能感并不影响这些公司员工的知识管理(T 统计量 = 0.992);另一方面,知识自我效能感会影响一致性、和谐性和自信心,进而影响这些公司员工的知识管理。间接效应表明,一致性可以缓和知识自我效能感对这些企业员工知识管理的影响(T 统计量 = 5959);反之,顺应性介导了信任对这些企业员工知识管理的强烈影响。实证结果表明,员工需要具备较高的知识水平,多样化的专业知识才能很好地发挥作用。相反,信任会使人们更愿意分享信息。我们感谢印度尼西亚泗水经济学院(STIESIA)提供的部分出版资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public-private partnership practices to transform textbook publishing and distribution: Nepal’s experience for quality education Do higher education institutions contribute to countries’ SDG progress: Evidence from university rankings Examination of the psychological well-being of students during the coronavirus pandemic: The case of Hungarian economic universities Environmental awareness of university students in Colombia The effect of lean tool on research culture and research performance in Indonesia’s higher education institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1