The rise of artificial intelligence in libraries: the ethical and equitable methodologies, and prospects for empowering library users

James Oluwaseyi Hodonu-Wusu
{"title":"The rise of artificial intelligence in libraries: the ethical and equitable methodologies, and prospects for empowering library users","authors":"James Oluwaseyi Hodonu-Wusu","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00432-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Libraries have always been a repository of knowledge, a place where people from all walks of life can come to learn and grow. In today’s fast-paced world, libraries must keep up with the changing times in order to remain relevant. Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most promising technologies that can help libraries achieve this goal. AI can help libraries automate processes, provide personalized services, and improve user experiences. However, with great power comes great responsibility, and AI is no exception. Libraries have an ethical and equitable promise to their users, and AI must be deployed in a way that upholds these promises. This study explores the ethical and equitable use of AI in libraries, how it can empower users, and what librarians need to consider when implementing AI. The result of the reviewed articles showed that 1499 out of 170,262 papers have been identified as describing AI in libraries through ethical and equitable methodologies and prospect for empowering library users. The future studies can focus on other professional terms, such as Trustworthy AI, Fairness in AI, Explainable AI, and Human-in-the-loop, and how this can impact libraries, and other professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"755 - 765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00432-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Libraries have always been a repository of knowledge, a place where people from all walks of life can come to learn and grow. In today’s fast-paced world, libraries must keep up with the changing times in order to remain relevant. Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most promising technologies that can help libraries achieve this goal. AI can help libraries automate processes, provide personalized services, and improve user experiences. However, with great power comes great responsibility, and AI is no exception. Libraries have an ethical and equitable promise to their users, and AI must be deployed in a way that upholds these promises. This study explores the ethical and equitable use of AI in libraries, how it can empower users, and what librarians need to consider when implementing AI. The result of the reviewed articles showed that 1499 out of 170,262 papers have been identified as describing AI in libraries through ethical and equitable methodologies and prospect for empowering library users. The future studies can focus on other professional terms, such as Trustworthy AI, Fairness in AI, Explainable AI, and Human-in-the-loop, and how this can impact libraries, and other professionals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在图书馆的兴起:伦理和公平方法,以及增强图书馆用户能力的前景
图书馆一直是知识的宝库,是各行各业的人学习和成长的地方。在当今快节奏的世界中,图书馆必须跟上时代的变化,才能保持相关性。人工智能(AI)是帮助图书馆实现这一目标的最有前途的技术之一。人工智能可以帮助图书馆实现流程自动化,提供个性化服务,并改善用户体验。然而,能力越大责任越大,人工智能也不例外。图书馆对其用户有道德和公平的承诺,人工智能必须以维护这些承诺的方式部署。本研究探讨了人工智能在图书馆中的道德和公平使用,它如何赋予用户权力,以及图书馆员在实施人工智能时需要考虑什么。审查的文章结果显示,在170262篇论文中,有1499篇论文被确定为通过道德和公平的方法描述图书馆中的人工智能,以及赋予图书馆用户权力的前景。未来的研究可以集中在其他专业术语上,如可信赖的人工智能、人工智能的公平性、可解释的人工智能和人在环,以及这将如何影响图书馆和其他专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
aiHumanoid v11.9: a large concept model for autonomous ethical reasoning in clinical AI Towards a clinical large language model: an ethico-legal case study analysis A lacanian re-reading of sex robots: human subjectivity and programmable compliance on desire Culturally contextual datasheets: a framework for embedding cultural reflexivity in global AI governance AI Trustworthiness Index for Healthcare (AITI-H): conceptualization, structure, and development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1