THE EFFECT OF MACROSTRUCTURE AND SUPERSTRUCTURE TEACHING ON SUMMARIZATION ACHIEVEMENT

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Problems of Education in the 21st Century Pub Date : 2024-02-18 DOI:10.33225/pec/24.82.85
Ebubekir Eroğlu, Serpil Özdemir
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF MACROSTRUCTURE AND SUPERSTRUCTURE TEACHING ON SUMMARIZATION ACHIEVEMENT","authors":"Ebubekir Eroğlu, Serpil Özdemir","doi":"10.33225/pec/24.82.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting and remembering the necessary information from rapidly increasing information requires summarization skills. Research on improving students' summarization skills has focused on deletion, generalization, and reconstruction strategies. However, direct teaching of these strategies does not yield successful results. For this reason, researchers have turned to teaching summarization based on understanding the text. Knowing the macrostructure and superstructure of the text can help understand the text and select the information to be included in the summary. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of macrostructure and superstructure teaching on summary writing achievement. The study was conducted in a one-group pretest-posttest design and lasted for 6 weeks. The study was conducted with 22 seventh grade students in a public secondary school. The data were collected with a total of 132 summary texts in which students summarized five stories. The summaries of texts were scored with the Text Summary Evaluation Rubric (TSER). As a result of the study, significant differences were obtained in summarization achievement in favor of the posttest. Based on this result, it is recommended that macrostructure and superstructure teaching be included in programs and course books. This study is limited to narrative texts. In future studies, whether the achievement in summarization narrative and informative texts differs and how long it takes for different age groups to develop their achievement in summarization of different types of texts can be examined based on text structure teaching.\nKeywords: Macrostructure teaching, superstructure teaching, summarization achievement, seventh grade students","PeriodicalId":44900,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting and remembering the necessary information from rapidly increasing information requires summarization skills. Research on improving students' summarization skills has focused on deletion, generalization, and reconstruction strategies. However, direct teaching of these strategies does not yield successful results. For this reason, researchers have turned to teaching summarization based on understanding the text. Knowing the macrostructure and superstructure of the text can help understand the text and select the information to be included in the summary. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of macrostructure and superstructure teaching on summary writing achievement. The study was conducted in a one-group pretest-posttest design and lasted for 6 weeks. The study was conducted with 22 seventh grade students in a public secondary school. The data were collected with a total of 132 summary texts in which students summarized five stories. The summaries of texts were scored with the Text Summary Evaluation Rubric (TSER). As a result of the study, significant differences were obtained in summarization achievement in favor of the posttest. Based on this result, it is recommended that macrostructure and superstructure teaching be included in programs and course books. This study is limited to narrative texts. In future studies, whether the achievement in summarization narrative and informative texts differs and how long it takes for different age groups to develop their achievement in summarization of different types of texts can be examined based on text structure teaching. Keywords: Macrostructure teaching, superstructure teaching, summarization achievement, seventh grade students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宏观结构和上层建筑教学对总结成绩的影响
从迅速增加的信息中选择并记住必要的信息需要总结能力。提高学生概括能力的研究主要集中在删除、概括和重构策略上。然而,直接教授这些策略并不能取得成功。因此,研究人员转而在理解文本的基础上进行总结教学。了解文本的宏观结构和上层建筑有助于理解文本并选择要纳入摘要的信息。本研究旨在确定宏观结构和上层建筑教学对摘要写作成绩的影响。研究采用单组前测后测设计,为期 6 周。研究对象是一所公立中学的 22 名七年级学生。共收集了 132 篇总结性文章的数据,学生们对其中的 5 个故事进行了总结。文本摘要采用文本摘要评价标准(TSER)进行评分。研究结果表明,在总结成绩方面,后测成绩与前测成绩存在显著差异。基于这一结果,建议将宏观结构和上层建筑教学纳入课程和教材中。本研究仅限于叙事文本。在今后的研究中,可以根据文本结构教学来考察叙事性文本和信息性文本的概括成绩是否有差异,以及不同年龄段的学生对不同类型文本的概括成绩的提高需要多长时间:宏观结构教学;上层建筑教学;概括成就;七年级学生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Problems of Education in the 21st Century
Problems of Education in the 21st Century EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Problems of Education in the 21st Century is an international, periodical scientific journal publishing original research across the whole of education. The journal''s Editorial Board and staff are committed to building PEC into the leading scientific journal in its field by publishing articles of outstanding scientific quality that merit the attention and interest of the whole educational community.
期刊最新文献
THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SCHOOL SUPPORT TEAM IN INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN KINDERGARTENS NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING AN EFL TEACHING-SPEAKING MODULE FOR THE UNIQUE LINGUISTIC TAPESTRY OF CHINESE BUSINESS ENGLISH UNDERGRADUATES QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES WITH SMALL SAMPLE SIZES: AN EDUCATIONAL SUMMER CAMP EXAMPLE TRENDS AND PERSPECTIVES IN EDUCATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE STUDIES PROBLEMS IN TEACHING ENGLISH ACADEMIC WRITING AMONG ESL LECTURERS AT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN MALAYSIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1