Insights Into Estimation of Sand Permeability: From Empirical Relations to Microstructure-based Methods

IF 0.7 Q4 MECHANICS Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica Pub Date : 2024-02-18 DOI:10.2478/sgem-2024-0001
Bartłomiej Bodak, Maciej Sobótka
{"title":"Insights Into Estimation of Sand Permeability: From Empirical Relations to Microstructure-based Methods","authors":"Bartłomiej Bodak, Maciej Sobótka","doi":"10.2478/sgem-2024-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study evaluates various methods for estimating soil permeability using microtomography-derived data and compares them to the conventional laboratory approaches. Different methods, including measurement in custom-designed permeameter at micro-CT-compatible scale, empirical equations, simulated sifting, semi-theoretical equations, pore-network modeling, and lattice-Boltzmann simulations, were applied to samples of sandy soils with distinct microstructural properties. The empirical equations showed varied results, highly dependent on the method chosen. The simulated sifting method was able to adequately estimate the granulometric properties of the soil, allowing the use of empirical permeability formulations for substantially small samples. Semi-theoretical equations based on the microstructural properties presented reasonable agreement for some samples. The pore-network modeling approach demonstrated computational efficiency but lacked accuracy. The lattice-Boltzmann method required significant computational resources but did not provide substantially closer alignment with the measured hydraulic properties of some samples. None of the simulations was able to properly determine the permeability of silty and organically contaminated sand. The study highlights the complexity of permeability estimation, emphasizing the need for choosing volumes of interest, resolution of micro-CT scans, and methods that match specific soil characteristics and available computational resources.","PeriodicalId":44626,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2024-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates various methods for estimating soil permeability using microtomography-derived data and compares them to the conventional laboratory approaches. Different methods, including measurement in custom-designed permeameter at micro-CT-compatible scale, empirical equations, simulated sifting, semi-theoretical equations, pore-network modeling, and lattice-Boltzmann simulations, were applied to samples of sandy soils with distinct microstructural properties. The empirical equations showed varied results, highly dependent on the method chosen. The simulated sifting method was able to adequately estimate the granulometric properties of the soil, allowing the use of empirical permeability formulations for substantially small samples. Semi-theoretical equations based on the microstructural properties presented reasonable agreement for some samples. The pore-network modeling approach demonstrated computational efficiency but lacked accuracy. The lattice-Boltzmann method required significant computational resources but did not provide substantially closer alignment with the measured hydraulic properties of some samples. None of the simulations was able to properly determine the permeability of silty and organically contaminated sand. The study highlights the complexity of permeability estimation, emphasizing the need for choosing volumes of interest, resolution of micro-CT scans, and methods that match specific soil characteristics and available computational resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算砂渗透性的启示:从经验关系到基于微观结构的方法
本研究评估了利用微层析成像数据估算土壤渗透性的各种方法,并将其与传统的实验室方法进行了比较。对具有不同微观结构特性的砂质土壤样本采用了不同的方法,包括在微观 CT 兼容尺度上使用定制设计的渗透仪测量、经验方程、模拟筛分、半理论方程、孔隙网络建模和晶格-玻尔兹曼模拟。经验方程的结果各不相同,在很大程度上取决于所选择的方法。模拟筛分法能够充分估算土壤的粒度特性,从而可以对较小的样本使用经验渗透率公式。基于微观结构特性的半理论方程与某些样本的结果达成了合理的一致。孔隙网络建模方法显示了计算效率,但缺乏准确性。晶格-玻尔兹曼法需要大量的计算资源,但与某些样品的实测水力特性并不十分吻合。所有模拟都无法正确确定淤泥和有机污染砂的渗透性。这项研究突出了渗透率估算的复杂性,强调需要选择感兴趣的体积、显微 CT 扫描的分辨率以及与特定土壤特性和可用计算资源相匹配的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international journal ‘Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica’ covers new developments in the broad areas of geomechanics as well as structural mechanics. The journal welcomes contributions dealing with original theoretical, numerical as well as experimental work. The following topics are of special interest: Constitutive relations for geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, etc.) Modeling of mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials at different scales Analysis of coupled thermo-hydro-chemo-mechanical problems Modeling of instabilities and localized deformation Experimental investigations of material properties at different scales Numerical algorithms: formulation and performance Application of numerical techniques to analysis of problems involving foundations, underground structures, slopes and embankment Risk and reliability analysis Analysis of concrete and masonry structures Modeling of case histories
期刊最新文献
Modeling of rigid inclusion ground improvements in large-scale geotechnical simulations Seismicity and Tectonics of the Republic of Kosovo Small-strain stiffness of selected anthropogenic aggregates from bender element tests The Role of Spatial Distribution of Geotechnical Soil Parameters in Site Investigation Geometrization of a 3D numerical model of an underground facility based on the results of terrestrial laser scanning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1