Extrauterine Growth Restriction and Catch-up Growth Following NICU Discharge: A Tale of two Standards

Q4 Medicine Journal of Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1177/09732179241228421
Lena F. Olgun, Andrea S. Weintraub, Robert S. Green
{"title":"Extrauterine Growth Restriction and Catch-up Growth Following NICU Discharge: A Tale of two Standards","authors":"Lena F. Olgun, Andrea S. Weintraub, Robert S. Green","doi":"10.1177/09732179241228421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is common in premature infants, but the progression after neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge is not well described. We aimed to assess EUGR after NICU discharge and to identify factors associated with catch-up growth (CUG) and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Methods: Growth parameters at birth, 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), and two neurodevelopmental follow-up visits for preterm graduates of our NICU were reviewed. EUGR was assessed using Fenton and Intergrowth-21 standards. Factors associated with outpatient growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age were evaluated using logistic and linear regression. Results: 369 infants born at 24–32 weeks gestation comprised the cohort. EUGR prevalence was 14.9% for Intergrowth-21 versus 56.4% for Fenton ( p < .001). Although there was a significant decrease in weight z-score from birth to 36 weeks PMA, weight z-scores returned to their birth weight values at the second clinic visit (86 weeks PMA). Infants who received formula as opposed to human milk (HM) showed faster CUG. Higher scores in the Bayley-III scale at 2 years of age were associated with HM feeding. Discussion/Conclusion: Fewer infants were identified as EUGR when Intergrowth-21 versus Fenton growth standards were used, which categorizes infants with adverse clinical courses and poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes more distinctly. While growth failure during the birth hospitalization is common in preterm infants, outpatient CUG was demonstrated, with return to birth weight z-score. Our findings suggest that HM feeding may have a positive impact on cognitive, language, and motor developmental outcomes for preterm infants despite less rapid CUG.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":"57 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179241228421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is common in premature infants, but the progression after neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge is not well described. We aimed to assess EUGR after NICU discharge and to identify factors associated with catch-up growth (CUG) and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Methods: Growth parameters at birth, 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), and two neurodevelopmental follow-up visits for preterm graduates of our NICU were reviewed. EUGR was assessed using Fenton and Intergrowth-21 standards. Factors associated with outpatient growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age were evaluated using logistic and linear regression. Results: 369 infants born at 24–32 weeks gestation comprised the cohort. EUGR prevalence was 14.9% for Intergrowth-21 versus 56.4% for Fenton ( p < .001). Although there was a significant decrease in weight z-score from birth to 36 weeks PMA, weight z-scores returned to their birth weight values at the second clinic visit (86 weeks PMA). Infants who received formula as opposed to human milk (HM) showed faster CUG. Higher scores in the Bayley-III scale at 2 years of age were associated with HM feeding. Discussion/Conclusion: Fewer infants were identified as EUGR when Intergrowth-21 versus Fenton growth standards were used, which categorizes infants with adverse clinical courses and poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes more distinctly. While growth failure during the birth hospitalization is common in preterm infants, outpatient CUG was demonstrated, with return to birth weight z-score. Our findings suggest that HM feeding may have a positive impact on cognitive, language, and motor developmental outcomes for preterm infants despite less rapid CUG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫外生长受限和新生儿重症监护室出院后的追赶生长:两种标准的故事
目的:宫外生长受限(EUGR)在早产儿中很常见,但新生儿重症监护室(NICU)出院后的进展情况却没有得到很好的描述。我们旨在评估新生儿重症监护室出院后的宫外生长受限情况,并确定与追赶生长(CUG)和两岁时神经发育结果相关的因素。研究方法我们回顾了新生儿重症监护室早产儿毕业生在出生时、月龄后 36 周(PMA)和两次神经发育随访时的生长参数。采用 Fenton 和 Intergrowth-21 标准对 EUGR 进行评估。使用逻辑回归和线性回归评估了与门诊生长和两岁时神经发育结果相关的因素。研究结果组群中有 369 名妊娠 24-32 周出生的婴儿。Intergrowth-21 的 EUGR 患病率为 14.9%,而 Fenton 为 56.4% ( p < .001)。虽然体重 Z 值在婴儿出生至 36 周 PMA 期间明显下降,但在第二次就诊时(86 周 PMA),体重 Z 值又恢复到出生体重值。接受配方奶粉而非人奶(HM)喂养的婴儿生长速度更快。两岁时,Bayley-III量表的得分较高与母乳喂养有关。讨论/结论:使用 Intergrowth-21 生长标准和 Fenton 生长标准时,被鉴定为 EUGR 的婴儿人数较少,这两种标准对临床病程不良和神经发育结果较差的婴儿进行了更明确的分类。虽然早产儿在出生住院期间生长发育迟缓的情况很常见,但门诊CUG的情况也得到了证实,出生体重z-score也得到了恢复。我们的研究结果表明,尽管早产儿CUG的生长速度较慢,但HM喂养可能会对早产儿的认知、语言和运动发育结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Post-operative Ultrashort Bowel Syndrome in a Term Neonate: One-year Follow-up Silent Struggles Beyond Breath: Decoding Hemostatic Dynamics and Bleeding in Neonates Affected by Perinatal Asphyxia Breast Milk Output and Factors Influencing Sustained Feeding with Mother’s Own Milk in Very Preterm Births: A Prospective Observational Study Assessment of Central Catheter Tip Position in Neonates by Ultrasonography Versus X-ray Kangaroo Mother Care Foundation, India: Champion Organization Focusing on the Essentials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1