Assessing the effectiveness of membrane sweeping combined with cervical massage for term pre-induction cervical ripening: A single experimental study

Kaavya Mylsamy, M. S. Supriya, Sindhujha Sekar, Nithin Palanisami PS
{"title":"Assessing the effectiveness of membrane sweeping combined with cervical massage for term pre-induction cervical ripening: A single experimental study","authors":"Kaavya Mylsamy, M. S. Supriya, Sindhujha Sekar, Nithin Palanisami PS","doi":"10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massage of the cervical region entails applying light pressure to the cervix to trigger the uterine contractions. Membrane sweeping, often called cervical sweeping or membrane stripping, releases hormones that may start labor by removing the amniotic sac from the uterine wall. Although membrane sweeping is helpful in several clinical trials, no studies have examined how effective cervical massage is when combined with membrane sweeping.This research compared the effectiveness of membrane sweeping and cervical massage as cervical ripening techniques in post-dated pregnancies before labor induction in specialized clinics. A total of 150 low-risk singleton pregnancies with a Modified Bishop Score (MBS) of fewer than five at 38 weeks of gestation were included. The experimental group received membrane sweeping with cervical massage, and the control group, which just received membrane sweeping, was randomly allocated to the participants. 48 hours after the intervention, changes in the MBS were used to gauge cervical favorability. Neonatal morbidity, membrane rupture, intrapartum and postpartum infections, and other complications were assessed.The mean ages and MBS of the primigravidae in the two research groups at induction were similar. After the intervention, the trial group's mean MBS was significantly higher than the control groups. Because of this, primigravidae observed a substantial change in the MBS after the operation. The experimental group's adverse effects and neonatal morbidity were comparable, except cardiotocographic abnormalities were observed more often in the control group.In some cases, when membrane sweeping cannot be conducted because of a closed cervical os, cervical massage combined with membrane sweeping appears successful and secure. A significant choice for obstetric care, this technique may aid cervical softening in post-dated pregnancies.","PeriodicalId":13288,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":"25 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Massage of the cervical region entails applying light pressure to the cervix to trigger the uterine contractions. Membrane sweeping, often called cervical sweeping or membrane stripping, releases hormones that may start labor by removing the amniotic sac from the uterine wall. Although membrane sweeping is helpful in several clinical trials, no studies have examined how effective cervical massage is when combined with membrane sweeping.This research compared the effectiveness of membrane sweeping and cervical massage as cervical ripening techniques in post-dated pregnancies before labor induction in specialized clinics. A total of 150 low-risk singleton pregnancies with a Modified Bishop Score (MBS) of fewer than five at 38 weeks of gestation were included. The experimental group received membrane sweeping with cervical massage, and the control group, which just received membrane sweeping, was randomly allocated to the participants. 48 hours after the intervention, changes in the MBS were used to gauge cervical favorability. Neonatal morbidity, membrane rupture, intrapartum and postpartum infections, and other complications were assessed.The mean ages and MBS of the primigravidae in the two research groups at induction were similar. After the intervention, the trial group's mean MBS was significantly higher than the control groups. Because of this, primigravidae observed a substantial change in the MBS after the operation. The experimental group's adverse effects and neonatal morbidity were comparable, except cardiotocographic abnormalities were observed more often in the control group.In some cases, when membrane sweeping cannot be conducted because of a closed cervical os, cervical massage combined with membrane sweeping appears successful and secure. A significant choice for obstetric care, this technique may aid cervical softening in post-dated pregnancies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估清宫术结合宫颈按摩对临产前宫颈成熟的效果:单一实验研究
对宫颈区域的按摩需要对宫颈施加轻微的压力,以引发子宫收缩。胎膜剥离通常被称为宫颈扫除或胎膜剥离,通过去除子宫壁上的羊膜囊释放激素,从而启动分娩。虽然在一些临床试验中,胎膜剥离对分娩很有帮助,但还没有研究探讨过宫颈按摩与胎膜剥离结合使用时的效果。这项研究比较了胎膜剥离和宫颈按摩作为宫颈成熟技术在专业诊所引产前对过期妊娠的效果。共有 150 名妊娠 38 周时修正毕晓普评分(MBS)低于 5 分的低风险单胎妊娠被纳入研究范围。实验组接受子宫颈按摩扫膜,对照组只接受子宫颈按摩扫膜。干预48小时后,用MBS的变化来衡量宫颈是否良好。两组初产妇在引产时的平均年龄和 MBS 相似。干预后,试验组的平均 MBS 明显高于对照组。因此,初产妇在手术后观察到了 MBS 的实质性变化。试验组的不良反应和新生儿发病率与对照组相当,但对照组的心排畸形发生率更高。这项技术是产科护理的重要选择,可帮助过期妊娠患者软化宫颈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The sequence of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEAS)- An infrequent case report Complications of placenta previa: A retrospective observational study at tertiary care hospital A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome Behind the veil of anemia: Assessment of iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 deficiencies and their association with red cell indices in anemic and non-anemic women Management of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy in India: A review of current practices and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1