American Clusters: Using Machine Learning to Understand Health and Health Care Disparities in the United States

Diana M Bowser, Kaili Maurico, Brielle A Ruscitti, William H Crown
{"title":"American Clusters: Using Machine Learning to Understand Health and Health Care Disparities in the United States","authors":"Diana M Bowser, Kaili Maurico, Brielle A Ruscitti, William H Crown","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Health and health care access in the U.S. is plagued by high inequality. While machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in clinical settings to inform health care delivery decisions and predict health care utilization, using ML as a research tool to understand health care disparities in the U.S. and how these are connected to health outcomes, access to health care, and health system organization is less common. We utilized over 650 variables from 24 different databases aggregated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in their Social Determinant of Health Database (SDOH). We used k-means–a non-hierarchical ML clustering method–to cluster county level data. Principal factor analysis created county level index values for each SDOH domain and two health care domains–health care infrastructure and health care access. Logistic regression classification was used to identify the primary drivers of cluster classification. The most efficient cluster classification consists of 3 distinct clusters in the U.S.; the cluster having the highest life expectancy comprised only 10% of counties. The most efficient ML clusters do not identify the clusters with the widest health care disparities. ML clustering, using county level data, shows that health care infrastructure and access are the primary drivers of cluster composition.","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health and health care access in the U.S. is plagued by high inequality. While machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in clinical settings to inform health care delivery decisions and predict health care utilization, using ML as a research tool to understand health care disparities in the U.S. and how these are connected to health outcomes, access to health care, and health system organization is less common. We utilized over 650 variables from 24 different databases aggregated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in their Social Determinant of Health Database (SDOH). We used k-means–a non-hierarchical ML clustering method–to cluster county level data. Principal factor analysis created county level index values for each SDOH domain and two health care domains–health care infrastructure and health care access. Logistic regression classification was used to identify the primary drivers of cluster classification. The most efficient cluster classification consists of 3 distinct clusters in the U.S.; the cluster having the highest life expectancy comprised only 10% of counties. The most efficient ML clusters do not identify the clusters with the widest health care disparities. ML clustering, using county level data, shows that health care infrastructure and access are the primary drivers of cluster composition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国集群:利用机器学习了解美国的健康和医疗差距
美国的健康和医疗服务存在严重的不平等。虽然机器学习(ML)越来越多地用于临床环境,为医疗服务决策提供信息并预测医疗服务的使用情况,但使用 ML 作为研究工具来了解美国的医疗差距以及这些差距如何与健康结果、医疗服务的获取和医疗系统的组织相关联,却并不常见。我们利用了医疗保健研究与质量机构(AHRQ)在其健康社会决定因素数据库(SDOH)中汇总的 24 个不同数据库中的 650 多个变量。我们使用 K-均值--一种非分层 ML 聚类方法--对县级数据进行聚类。主因子分析为每个 SDOH 领域和两个医疗保健领域(医疗保健基础设施和医疗保健获取)创建了县级指数值。逻辑回归分类用于确定聚类分类的主要驱动因素。在美国,最有效的聚类分类由 3 个不同的聚类组成;预期寿命最高的聚类只占县的 10%。最有效的 ML 聚类并不能确定医疗差距最大的聚类。使用县级数据进行的 ML 聚类显示,医疗保健基础设施和获取途径是聚类构成的主要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The state of health information organizations and plans to participate in the federal exchange framework. Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead. Differential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health service access among Medicaid-enrolled individuals. An increasing number of states filled Conrad 30 waivers for recruiting international medical graduates. Over- and underreporting of prices: most hospitals are not compliant with the Hospital Price Transparency Rule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1