The Evolving Study of Revolution

IF 5.5 3区材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1353/wp.0.a920225

M. Beissinger

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the practice of revolution has evolved, so too have theories of revolution. Much of the current literature on revolutions focuses on contentious processes. But a need exists to take a more holistic approach—one that better incorporates history, thinks across divides in the literature, contemplates what precedes and follows revolution, and places revolutionary processes and the structural factors that underpin them into dialogue with one another.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

不断发展的革命研究

随着革命实践的发展，革命理论也在不断演变。目前关于革命的大部分文献都侧重于有争议的过程。但是，我们需要采取一种更加全面的方法--更好地结合历史，跨越文献中的分歧，思考革命的前因后果，并将革命进程与支撑革命的结构性因素置于对话之中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry

CiteScore

10.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

1368

期刊介绍： ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.

期刊最新文献

Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Optimization of Fluorinated Ether-Based Quasi-Solid Electrolyte Systems for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries Optimizing Polybenzimidazole Binders for High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Unexpected Redox-Inert Behaviors and Their Mechanisms of Doped Transition Metals in K0.5MnO2 Cathodes