One-Dimensional vs. Three-Dimensional Models in Free Vibration Analysis of Axially Functionally Graded Beams with Non-Uniform Cross-Sections

IF 1.5 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Mechanics of Composite Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s11029-024-10176-4
{"title":"One-Dimensional vs. Three-Dimensional Models in Free Vibration Analysis of Axially Functionally Graded Beams with Non-Uniform Cross-Sections","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11029-024-10176-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A comparison of one-dimensional (1D) and three-dimensional (3D) models for simulating free vibrations of axially functionally graded material (AFGM) beams with non-uniform cross-sections was carried out. Both models were constructed using ABAQUS and the eigenvalue problem was solved to determine the natural frequencies and their corresponding mode shapes. User-defined material model subroutines (UMAT) were developed using 1D beam or 3D hexagonal graded finite elements to implement material gradients into appropriate finite element models. The performance of both models was evaluated using data for beams with non-uniform cross-sections and material gradation profiles for which natural frequencies were available in the literature. The accuracy and effectiveness of each modeling approach proposed were estimated by comparing the results obtained. Generally, distinctions between the 1D and 3D models become more pronounced as the geometric complexity and material inhomogeneity of AFGM beams increases, especially for high-frequency modes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18308,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Composite Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Composite Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-024-10176-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparison of one-dimensional (1D) and three-dimensional (3D) models for simulating free vibrations of axially functionally graded material (AFGM) beams with non-uniform cross-sections was carried out. Both models were constructed using ABAQUS and the eigenvalue problem was solved to determine the natural frequencies and their corresponding mode shapes. User-defined material model subroutines (UMAT) were developed using 1D beam or 3D hexagonal graded finite elements to implement material gradients into appropriate finite element models. The performance of both models was evaluated using data for beams with non-uniform cross-sections and material gradation profiles for which natural frequencies were available in the literature. The accuracy and effectiveness of each modeling approach proposed were estimated by comparing the results obtained. Generally, distinctions between the 1D and 3D models become more pronounced as the geometric complexity and material inhomogeneity of AFGM beams increases, especially for high-frequency modes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非均匀截面轴向功能梯度梁自由振动分析中的一维模型与三维模型对比
在模拟横截面不均匀的轴向功能分级材料(AFGM)梁的自由振动时,对一维(1D)和三维(3D)模型进行了比较。两个模型均使用 ABAQUS 建立,并通过求解特征值问题确定固有频率及其相应的模态振型。使用一维梁或三维六边形分级有限元开发了用户自定义材料模型子程序(UMAT),以便在适当的有限元模型中实现材料梯度。这两种模型的性能都是通过非均匀横截面梁的数据和材料梯度剖面进行评估的,自然频率可从文献中获得。通过比较所获得的结果,估计了所提出的每种建模方法的准确性和有效性。一般来说,随着 AFGM 梁的几何复杂性和材料不均匀性的增加,一维模型和三维模型之间的区别变得更加明显,特别是对于高频模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanics of Composite Materials
Mechanics of Composite Materials 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics of Composite Materials is a peer-reviewed international journal that encourages publication of original experimental and theoretical research on the mechanical properties of composite materials and their constituents including, but not limited to: damage, failure, fatigue, and long-term strength; methods of optimum design of materials and structures; prediction of long-term properties and aging problems; nondestructive testing; mechanical aspects of technology; mechanics of nanocomposites; mechanics of biocomposites; composites in aerospace and wind-power engineering; composites in civil engineering and infrastructure and other composites applications.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Free Vibration and Low-Velocity Impact Response on Sandwich Cylindrical Shells Containing Fluid Mechanical Properties-Based Reliability Optimization Design of GFRP Culvert Dual-Phase Lag Model for a Solid Cylinder Made of Two Different Thermoelastic Materials Free Vibration Analysis of Functionally Graded Nano Graphene Composite Sandwich Plates Resting on a Winkler-Pasternak Foundation Multiphysics Homogenization and Localization of Wavy Brick-And-Mortar Architectures with Piezoelectric Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1