Effects of group awareness support in CSCL on students’ learning performance: A three-level meta-analysis

IF 5.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s11412-024-09418-3
Dengkang Chen, Yi Zhang, Heng Luo, Zhifang Zhu, Jingsi Ma, Yuru Lin
{"title":"Effects of group awareness support in CSCL on students’ learning performance: A three-level meta-analysis","authors":"Dengkang Chen, Yi Zhang, Heng Luo, Zhifang Zhu, Jingsi Ma, Yuru Lin","doi":"10.1007/s11412-024-09418-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Group awareness (GA) is essential for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), as it informs learners about other group members’ activities, knowledge, and emotions. A key advantage of GA support is that it can collect, process, and visualize GA information, which provides a basis for students’ reflection and adjustment during collaborative learning, thus facilitating their learning performance. However, empirical findings regarding the effectiveness of GA support have been inconsistent. The present study conducted the first three-level meta-analysis of 46 empirical studies to examine the effects of GA support on students’ learning performance and further explore the possible moderating factors that may have contributed to the inconsistencies of primary studies. The results indicated the following: (1) GA support in CSCL had a moderate significant effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’<i>g</i> = 0.46, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001); (2) GA support in CSCL had the greatest influence on students’ cognitive development (Hedges’<i>g</i> = 0.49, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), followed by behavioral participation (Hedges’<i>g</i> = 0.47, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and then social emotion (Hedges’<i>g</i> = 0.38, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001); and (3) GA support type and group size were the only two significant moderating factors. Based on these findings, we propose several theoretical and pedagogical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47189,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09418-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group awareness (GA) is essential for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), as it informs learners about other group members’ activities, knowledge, and emotions. A key advantage of GA support is that it can collect, process, and visualize GA information, which provides a basis for students’ reflection and adjustment during collaborative learning, thus facilitating their learning performance. However, empirical findings regarding the effectiveness of GA support have been inconsistent. The present study conducted the first three-level meta-analysis of 46 empirical studies to examine the effects of GA support on students’ learning performance and further explore the possible moderating factors that may have contributed to the inconsistencies of primary studies. The results indicated the following: (1) GA support in CSCL had a moderate significant effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’g = 0.46, p < 0.001); (2) GA support in CSCL had the greatest influence on students’ cognitive development (Hedges’g = 0.49, p < 0.001), followed by behavioral participation (Hedges’g = 0.47, p < 0.001), and then social emotion (Hedges’g = 0.38, p < 0.001); and (3) GA support type and group size were the only two significant moderating factors. Based on these findings, we propose several theoretical and pedagogical implications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CSCL 中的小组意识支持对学生学习成绩的影响:三级荟萃分析
小组认知(GA)对于计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)至关重要,因为它能让学习者了解其他小组成员的活动、知识和情感。小组认知支持的一个重要优势是可以收集、处理和可视化小组认知信息,为学生在协作学习过程中进行反思和调整提供依据,从而促进他们的学习表现。然而,有关GA支持有效性的实证研究结果并不一致。本研究首次对 46 项实证研究进行了三级荟萃分析,以考察天基支持对学生学习成绩的影响,并进一步探讨可能导致主要研究不一致的调节因素。结果表明(1)CSCL 中的性别支持对学生的学习成绩有中等程度的显著影响(Hedges'g = 0.46, p < 0.001);(2)CSCL 中的性别支持对学生的认知发展影响最大(Hedges'g = 0.49,p <;0.001),其次是行为参与(Hedges'g = 0.47,p <;0.001),然后是社会情感(Hedges'g = 0.38,p <;0.001);(3)GA 支持类型和小组规模是仅有的两个显著调节因素。基于这些发现,我们提出了一些理论和教学启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: An official publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences, the International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (IJCSCL) fosters a deep understanding of the nature, theory, and practice of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). The journal serves as a forum for experts from such disciplines as education, computer science, information technology, psychology, communications, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, and business. Articles investigate how to design the technological settings for collaboration and how people learn in the context of collaborative activity.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the effects of a collaboration script and collaborative reflection on promoting knowledge about good collaboration and effective interaction Capturing temporal pathways of collaborative roles: A multilayered analytical approach using community of inquiry Revealing the interplay of cognitive, meta-cognitive, and social processes in university students’ collaborative problem solving: a three-stage analytical framework Knowledge creation through maker practices and the role of teacher and peer support in collaborative invention projects Combining Danmaku and Discussion Boards: Toward A Scalable and Sociable Environment for Mass Collaboration in MOOCs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1