Harris Poll Migraine Report Card: population-based examination of high-frequency headache/migraine and acute medication overuse

Amaal J. Starling, Roger Cady, Dawn C. Buse, Meghan Buzby, Charlie Spinale, Kathy Steinberg, Kevin Lenaburg, Steven Kymes
{"title":"Harris Poll Migraine Report Card: population-based examination of high-frequency headache/migraine and acute medication overuse","authors":"Amaal J. Starling, Roger Cady, Dawn C. Buse, Meghan Buzby, Charlie Spinale, Kathy Steinberg, Kevin Lenaburg, Steven Kymes","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01725-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migraine is a disabling neurologic disease that can fluctuate over time in severity, frequency, and acute medication use. Harris Poll Migraine Report Card was a US population-based survey to ascertain quantifiable distinctions amongst individuals with current versus previous high-frequency headache/migraine and acute medication overuse (HFM+AMO). The objective of this report is to compare self-reported experiences in the migraine journey of adults with HFM+AMO to those who previously experienced HFM+AMO but currently have a sustained reduction in headache/migraine frequency and acute medication use. An online survey was available to a general population panel of adults (≥18 years) with migraine per the ID Migraine™ screener. Respondents were classified into “current HFM+AMO” (within the last few months had ≥8 headache days/month and ≥10 days/month of acute medication use; n=440) or “previous HFM+AMO” (previously had HFM+AMO, but within the last few months had ≤7 headache days/month and ≤9 days/month of acute medication use; n=110). Survey questions pertained to demographics, diagnosis, living with migraine, healthcare provider (HCP) communication, and treatment. Participants in the current HFM+AMO group had 15.2 monthly headache days and 17.4 days of monthly acute medication use in last few months compared to 4.2 and 4.1 days for the previous HFM+AMO group, respectively. Overall, current preventive pharmacologic treatment use was low (15-16%; P>0.1 for current vs previous) in both groups. Previous HFM+AMO respondents reported better current acute treatment optimization. More respondents with current (80%) than previous HFM+AMO (66%) expressed concern with their current health (P<0.05). More than one-third of both groups wished their HCP better understood their mental/emotional health (current 37%, previous 35%; P>0.1 for current vs previous) and 47% (current) to 54% (previous) of respondents worried about asking their HCP too many questions (P>0.1 for current vs previous). Apart from optimization of acute medication, medical interventions did not significantly differentiate between the current and previous HFM+AMO groups. Use of preventive pharmacological medication was low in both groups. Adults with current HFM+AMO more often had health concerns, yet both groups expressed concerns of disease burden. Optimization of acute and preventive medication and addressing mental/emotional health concerns of patients are areas where migraine care may impact outcomes regardless of their disease burden. ","PeriodicalId":501630,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01725-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Migraine is a disabling neurologic disease that can fluctuate over time in severity, frequency, and acute medication use. Harris Poll Migraine Report Card was a US population-based survey to ascertain quantifiable distinctions amongst individuals with current versus previous high-frequency headache/migraine and acute medication overuse (HFM+AMO). The objective of this report is to compare self-reported experiences in the migraine journey of adults with HFM+AMO to those who previously experienced HFM+AMO but currently have a sustained reduction in headache/migraine frequency and acute medication use. An online survey was available to a general population panel of adults (≥18 years) with migraine per the ID Migraine™ screener. Respondents were classified into “current HFM+AMO” (within the last few months had ≥8 headache days/month and ≥10 days/month of acute medication use; n=440) or “previous HFM+AMO” (previously had HFM+AMO, but within the last few months had ≤7 headache days/month and ≤9 days/month of acute medication use; n=110). Survey questions pertained to demographics, diagnosis, living with migraine, healthcare provider (HCP) communication, and treatment. Participants in the current HFM+AMO group had 15.2 monthly headache days and 17.4 days of monthly acute medication use in last few months compared to 4.2 and 4.1 days for the previous HFM+AMO group, respectively. Overall, current preventive pharmacologic treatment use was low (15-16%; P>0.1 for current vs previous) in both groups. Previous HFM+AMO respondents reported better current acute treatment optimization. More respondents with current (80%) than previous HFM+AMO (66%) expressed concern with their current health (P<0.05). More than one-third of both groups wished their HCP better understood their mental/emotional health (current 37%, previous 35%; P>0.1 for current vs previous) and 47% (current) to 54% (previous) of respondents worried about asking their HCP too many questions (P>0.1 for current vs previous). Apart from optimization of acute medication, medical interventions did not significantly differentiate between the current and previous HFM+AMO groups. Use of preventive pharmacological medication was low in both groups. Adults with current HFM+AMO more often had health concerns, yet both groups expressed concerns of disease burden. Optimization of acute and preventive medication and addressing mental/emotional health concerns of patients are areas where migraine care may impact outcomes regardless of their disease burden.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harris Poll 偏头痛报告卡:基于人群的高频头痛/偏头痛和急性药物过度使用调查
偏头痛是一种致残性神经系统疾病,其严重程度、频率和急性用药情况会随时间变化。Harris Poll偏头痛报告卡是一项基于美国人口的调查,旨在确定当前与以往高频头痛/偏头痛和急性药物过度使用(HFM+AMO)患者之间的量化区别。本报告旨在比较患有高频率头痛/偏头痛和急性用药过度(HFM+AMO)的成年人与曾患有高频率头痛/偏头痛但目前头痛/偏头痛频率和急性用药持续减少的成年人在偏头痛历程中的自我报告经历。根据 ID Migraine™ 筛选器,对患有偏头痛的成年人(≥18 岁)进行了在线调查。受访者被分为 "当前 HFM+AMO"(过去几个月内头痛天数≥8 天/月,急性用药天数≥10 天/月;人数=440)或 "以前 HFM+AMO"(以前患有 HFM+AMO,但过去几个月内头痛天数≤7 天/月,急性用药天数≤9 天/月;人数=110)。调查问题涉及人口统计学、诊断、偏头痛患者生活、医疗保健提供者(HCP)沟通和治疗。目前的 "高频治疗 "+"AMO "组患者在过去几个月中每月头痛天数为15.2天,每月急性用药天数为17.4天,而之前的 "高频治疗 "+"AMO "组患者头痛天数和急性用药天数分别为4.2天和4.1天。总体而言,两组受访者目前的预防性药物治疗使用率均较低(15-16%;目前与之前相比,P>0.1)。之前接受过 HFM+AMO 治疗的受访者表示目前的急性期治疗优化效果更好。与以前的 HFM+AMO 受访者(66%)相比,现在的 HFM+AMO 受访者(80%)有更多的人对自己目前的健康状况表示担忧(现在与以前相比,P0.1),47%(现在)至 54%(以前)的受访者担心会向他们的保健医生询问过多问题(现在与以前相比,P>0.1)。除了优化急性期用药外,医疗干预措施在目前和以前的高频医疗+AMO 组之间没有明显区别。两组的预防性药物使用率都很低。目前患有高脂血症+急性心肌梗死的成年人更经常有健康问题,但两组人都对疾病负担表示担忧。无论偏头痛患者的疾病负担如何,优化急性期和预防性用药以及解决患者的心理/情感健康问题都是偏头痛护理可能影响疗效的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in new daily persistent headache patients: a single arm open label study Involvement of the cerebellum in structural connectivity enhancement in episodic migraine Concordance between venous sinus pressure and intracranial pressure in patients investigated for idiopathic intracranial hypertension Oxytocin shortens spreading depolarization-induced periorbital allodynia Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members’ vision – part 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1