Faith and facts: Exploring the intersection of religion and science among anatomy educators.

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1002/ase.2400
William S Brooks, Joseph E Deweese, Adam B Wilson
{"title":"Faith and facts: Exploring the intersection of religion and science among anatomy educators.","authors":"William S Brooks, Joseph E Deweese, Adam B Wilson","doi":"10.1002/ase.2400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intersection of religion and science often elicits polarizing views among scientists, though approximately half of American scientists identify as religious. Mounting evidence also supports the role of spirituality in comprehensive patient care. The purpose of this study was to explore the religiosity of faculty who teach in the anatomical sciences at U.S. colleges and universities. Surveys were administered to anatomists through two professional societies. Two-thirds (64.9%, 74/114) of respondents identified as religious, 26.3% (30/114) as atheist, and 8.8% (10/114) as agnostic. Most respondents (64.9%, 74/114) disagreed with the statement, \"There is no place for religion and science to intersect.\" Approximately one in three respondents expressed concern that sharing/disclosing their religious beliefs would negatively affect the perceptions of colleagues (32.5%, 37/114) and students (28.9%, 33/114) toward them. Faculty at faith-based institutions were more open to disclosing their beliefs (p = 0.045), and highly religious individuals were more concerned (p = 0.001). Fewer than one-fifth of respondents 17.5% (20/114) personally experienced mistreatment or discrimination within academic settings due to their religious beliefs. Most respondents held politically liberal-leaning views (71.0%, 76/107). Highly religious individuals were more likely to be politically conservative (p < 0.001). Overall, this study demonstrates that the number of anatomists who identify as religious may be higher than that of other biological disciplines and that mistreatment due to religious views remains a challenge for some in the profession. Continued dialogue regarding the role of religion in professional identity expression may be an important step in mitigating religion-focused mistreatment and discrimination in academic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intersection of religion and science often elicits polarizing views among scientists, though approximately half of American scientists identify as religious. Mounting evidence also supports the role of spirituality in comprehensive patient care. The purpose of this study was to explore the religiosity of faculty who teach in the anatomical sciences at U.S. colleges and universities. Surveys were administered to anatomists through two professional societies. Two-thirds (64.9%, 74/114) of respondents identified as religious, 26.3% (30/114) as atheist, and 8.8% (10/114) as agnostic. Most respondents (64.9%, 74/114) disagreed with the statement, "There is no place for religion and science to intersect." Approximately one in three respondents expressed concern that sharing/disclosing their religious beliefs would negatively affect the perceptions of colleagues (32.5%, 37/114) and students (28.9%, 33/114) toward them. Faculty at faith-based institutions were more open to disclosing their beliefs (p = 0.045), and highly religious individuals were more concerned (p = 0.001). Fewer than one-fifth of respondents 17.5% (20/114) personally experienced mistreatment or discrimination within academic settings due to their religious beliefs. Most respondents held politically liberal-leaning views (71.0%, 76/107). Highly religious individuals were more likely to be politically conservative (p < 0.001). Overall, this study demonstrates that the number of anatomists who identify as religious may be higher than that of other biological disciplines and that mistreatment due to religious views remains a challenge for some in the profession. Continued dialogue regarding the role of religion in professional identity expression may be an important step in mitigating religion-focused mistreatment and discrimination in academic settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信仰与事实:在解剖学教育工作者中探索宗教与科学的交汇点。
宗教与科学的交汇往往会在科学家中引起两极分化的观点,尽管约有一半的美国科学家认为自己信教。越来越多的证据也支持灵性在病人综合护理中的作用。本研究的目的是探讨在美国高校教授解剖科学的教师的宗教信仰。我们通过两个专业协会对解剖学家进行了调查。三分之二的受访者(64.9%,74/114)认为自己信教,26.3%(30/114)认为自己是无神论者,8.8%(10/114)认为自己是不可知论者。大多数受访者(64.9%,74/114)不同意 "宗教与科学没有交集 "这一说法。大约三分之一的受访者表示担心分享/公开自己的宗教信仰会对同事(32.5%,37/114)和学生(28.9%,33/114)的看法产生负面影响。信仰机构的教职员工更愿意公开自己的信仰(p = 0.045),而宗教信仰高深的教职员工则更担心(p = 0.001)。只有不到五分之一的受访者 17.5%(20/114)曾因其宗教信仰而在学术环境中遭受虐待或歧视。大多数受访者持有政治自由倾向的观点(71.0%,76/107)。宗教信仰高的人更有可能在政治上持保守态度(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Anatomy outreach: A conceptual model of shared purposes and processes. Students with prior anatomy experience start out stronger in medical school gross anatomy. A pilot study exploring the effectiveness of binaural beats at reducing anxiety associated with cadaveric dissection. Learning cardiac embryology on YouTube-What videos are there to view? Medical school students' perspectives on virtual anatomy education in a developing country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1