A Novel Rat Model to Simulate the Benign Esophageal Stricture Induced by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

IF 2.5 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEG.S435690
Yin-Gen Luo, Xiao-Wu Zhang, He Zhao, Jin-Gui Li, Jiay-Wei Tsauo, Tao Gong, Ai-Xin Ou, Tian-Hao Cong, Wen-Di Kang, Xiao Li
{"title":"A Novel Rat Model to Simulate the Benign Esophageal Stricture Induced by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.","authors":"Yin-Gen Luo, Xiao-Wu Zhang, He Zhao, Jin-Gui Li, Jiay-Wei Tsauo, Tao Gong, Ai-Xin Ou, Tian-Hao Cong, Wen-Di Kang, Xiao Li","doi":"10.2147/CEG.S435690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a rat model that simulates benign esophageal strictures induced by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into mucosal resection (n = 8) and sham-operated groups (n = 8). The rats in the mucosal resection group underwent a 5-mm three-fourths mucosal resection by way of a 3-mm incision in the distal esophagus under direct visualization via laparotomy. Rats in the sham-operated group underwent a 3-mm incision of the muscularis propria layer in the distal esophagus via laparotomy without mucosal resection. Dysphagia score, weight gain, mucosal constriction rate, and histology were evaluated 2 weeks after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was achieved in all the animals. One rat in the mucosal resection group died of infection, and no other complications were observed. Weight gain (P < 0.001) and luminal diameter derived from the esophagograms (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the mucosal resection group than those in the sham-operated group. Dysphagia score (P < 0.001) and mucosal constriction rate (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the mucosal resection group than those in the sham-operated group. The inflammation grade (P = 0.002), damage to the muscularis propria (P < 0.001), number of nascent microvessels (P = 0.006), and degree of α-SMA positive deposition (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in the mucosal resection group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A rat model of benign esophageal stricture induced by ESD was successfully and safely established by mucosal resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","volume":"17 ","pages":"41-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10891275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S435690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to establish a rat model that simulates benign esophageal strictures induced by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Materials and methods: Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into mucosal resection (n = 8) and sham-operated groups (n = 8). The rats in the mucosal resection group underwent a 5-mm three-fourths mucosal resection by way of a 3-mm incision in the distal esophagus under direct visualization via laparotomy. Rats in the sham-operated group underwent a 3-mm incision of the muscularis propria layer in the distal esophagus via laparotomy without mucosal resection. Dysphagia score, weight gain, mucosal constriction rate, and histology were evaluated 2 weeks after surgery.

Results: Technical success was achieved in all the animals. One rat in the mucosal resection group died of infection, and no other complications were observed. Weight gain (P < 0.001) and luminal diameter derived from the esophagograms (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the mucosal resection group than those in the sham-operated group. Dysphagia score (P < 0.001) and mucosal constriction rate (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the mucosal resection group than those in the sham-operated group. The inflammation grade (P = 0.002), damage to the muscularis propria (P < 0.001), number of nascent microvessels (P = 0.006), and degree of α-SMA positive deposition (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in the mucosal resection group.

Conclusion: A rat model of benign esophageal stricture induced by ESD was successfully and safely established by mucosal resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟内镜黏膜下切口诱发良性食管狭窄的新型大鼠模型
研究目的本研究旨在建立一种大鼠模型,模拟内镜粘膜下剥离术(ESD)诱发的良性食管狭窄:将 16 只雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠随机分为粘膜切除组(n = 8)和假手术组(n = 8)。粘膜切除组大鼠在腹腔镜直视下通过食管远端 3 毫米切口进行 5 毫米四分之三粘膜切除。假手术组大鼠通过开腹手术在食管远端切开 3 毫米的固有肌层,但不进行粘膜切除。术后两周对吞咽困难评分、体重增加、粘膜收缩率和组织学进行评估:结果:所有动物都取得了技术成功。粘膜切除组有一只大鼠死于感染,未发现其他并发症。粘膜切除组的体重增加(P < 0.001)和食管造影得出的管腔直径(P < 0.001)明显低于假手术组。粘膜切除组的吞咽困难评分(P < 0.001)和粘膜收缩率(P < 0.001)明显高于假手术组。粘膜切除组的炎症等级(P = 0.002)、固有肌损伤(P < 0.001)、新生微血管数量(P = 0.006)和α-SMA阳性沉积程度(P = 0.006)均明显高于假手术组:结论:通过粘膜切除术成功、安全地建立了由ESD诱发的大鼠良性食管狭窄模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tumor-Stroma Ratio is a Critical Indicator of Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric Cancer. Managing Leaks and Fistulas After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Challenges and Solutions. Associations of Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder with Constipation: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Erratum: Review of the Patient Burden and Therapeutic Landscape of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation in the United States [Corrigendum]. Therapeutic Potential of Etrasimod in the Management of Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence to Date.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1