Anticoagulant therapy in orthopedic surgery - a review on anticoagulant agents, risk factors, monitoring, and current challenges.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536241233473
Yiqun Wang, Xiaobin Xu, Wei Zhu
{"title":"Anticoagulant therapy in orthopedic surgery - a review on anticoagulant agents, risk factors, monitoring, and current challenges.","authors":"Yiqun Wang, Xiaobin Xu, Wei Zhu","doi":"10.1177/10225536241233473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthopedic surgeries are associated with high-risk of thromboembolism which occurs in 40% to 60% of orthopedic patients in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Conventionally heparin anticoagulants were used for thromboprophylaxis and currently direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used due to their minimal complexity. Anticoagulant use carries bleeding risk and requires optimal laboratory monitoring through conventional thrombin-based assays, anti-Xa assay, anti-IIa assay and contemporary ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and rotational thromboelastometry. Monitoring requires multiple hospital visits and hence, the development of point-of-care assays is gaining momentum. Also, a thorough risk assessment model (RAM) is necessary for successful anticoagulant therapy since it enables personalized approach for better thromboprophylaxis outcomes. Despite welcoming changes, lack of guideline consensus, population-based thromboprophylaxis, deficiencies in risk stratification and non-adherence are still a concern. Stronger clinical and process support system with uniform guidelines approaches and patient-specific RAM can aid in the successful implementation of anticoagulant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":"10225536241233473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241233473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthopedic surgeries are associated with high-risk of thromboembolism which occurs in 40% to 60% of orthopedic patients in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Conventionally heparin anticoagulants were used for thromboprophylaxis and currently direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used due to their minimal complexity. Anticoagulant use carries bleeding risk and requires optimal laboratory monitoring through conventional thrombin-based assays, anti-Xa assay, anti-IIa assay and contemporary ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and rotational thromboelastometry. Monitoring requires multiple hospital visits and hence, the development of point-of-care assays is gaining momentum. Also, a thorough risk assessment model (RAM) is necessary for successful anticoagulant therapy since it enables personalized approach for better thromboprophylaxis outcomes. Despite welcoming changes, lack of guideline consensus, population-based thromboprophylaxis, deficiencies in risk stratification and non-adherence are still a concern. Stronger clinical and process support system with uniform guidelines approaches and patient-specific RAM can aid in the successful implementation of anticoagulant therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科手术中的抗凝治疗--关于抗凝剂、风险因素、监测和当前挑战的综述。
骨科手术具有高血栓栓塞风险,40% 到 60% 的骨科患者在没有血栓预防措施的情况下会发生血栓栓塞。传统的血栓预防方法是使用肝素抗凝剂,而目前直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)因其极低的复杂性而被广泛使用。使用抗凝剂有出血风险,需要通过传统的凝血酶测定法、抗 Xa 测定法、抗 IIa 测定法以及现代的埃卡林色原测定法(ECA)和旋转血栓弹性测定法进行最佳实验室监测。监测需要多次到医院就诊,因此护理点检测的发展势头日益强劲。此外,全面的风险评估模型(RAM)也是成功进行抗凝治疗的必要条件,因为它可以采用个性化的方法,以获得更好的血栓预防效果。尽管这些变化令人欣喜,但缺乏指南共识、以人群为基础的血栓预防、风险分层的缺陷和不依从性仍是一个令人担忧的问题。加强临床和流程支持系统,采用统一的指南方法和针对特定患者的 RAM,有助于抗凝疗法的成功实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis after one- and two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anxiety and depression as risk factors for postoperative complications and pain in lumbar spine surgery: A national database study Imaging evaluation of extraarticular posterior loose bodies in varus ankle osteoarthritis Oblique sliding ulna osteotomy to treat paediatric neglected monteggia fracture dislocation. Comparative analysis of changes in spinal dimensions following different correction methods in adult spinal deformity surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1