Clinical Significance of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Older Patients Over 80.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2024-04-15 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0245
Daina Kashiwazaki, Emiko Hori, Naoki Akioka, Kunitaka Maruyama, Shusuke Yamamoto, Naoya Kuwayama, Kyo Noguchi, Satoshi Kuroda
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in Older Patients Over 80.","authors":"Daina Kashiwazaki, Emiko Hori, Naoki Akioka, Kunitaka Maruyama, Shusuke Yamamoto, Naoya Kuwayama, Kyo Noguchi, Satoshi Kuroda","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the average life expectancy increases, neurosurgeons are likely to encounter patients aged 80 years and above with carotid stenosis; however, whether old age affects clinical post-treatment outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains inconclusive. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following CEA or CAS in patients aged 80 years and above. This study included older over 80 years (n = 34) and younger patients (<80 years; n = 222) who underwent CEA or CAS between 2012 and 2022. All of them were followed up for a mean of 55 months. All-cause mortality, the incidence of vascular events, ability to perform daily activities, and nursing home admission rates were assessed. During follow-up periods, 34 patients (13.3%) died due to coronary artery disease, malignancy, and pneumonia, and the incidence was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.03; HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.53-5.56). The incidence of vascular events did not differ between the older group (29.5%) and the younger group (26.9%, P = 0.58); however, the incidence was significantly higher in patients with high-intensity plaques than in those without that (P = 0.008; HR, 2.83, 95%CI, 1.27-4.87). The decline in the ability to perform daily activities and increased nursing home admission rates were high in elderly patients (P < 0.01). Although the mortality rate was higher in the elderly group, subsequent vascular events were comparable to that in the younger group. The results suggest that CEA and CAS are safe and useful treatments for carotid stenosis in older patients, especially to prevent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"147-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the average life expectancy increases, neurosurgeons are likely to encounter patients aged 80 years and above with carotid stenosis; however, whether old age affects clinical post-treatment outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains inconclusive. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following CEA or CAS in patients aged 80 years and above. This study included older over 80 years (n = 34) and younger patients (<80 years; n = 222) who underwent CEA or CAS between 2012 and 2022. All of them were followed up for a mean of 55 months. All-cause mortality, the incidence of vascular events, ability to perform daily activities, and nursing home admission rates were assessed. During follow-up periods, 34 patients (13.3%) died due to coronary artery disease, malignancy, and pneumonia, and the incidence was significantly higher in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.03; HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.53-5.56). The incidence of vascular events did not differ between the older group (29.5%) and the younger group (26.9%, P = 0.58); however, the incidence was significantly higher in patients with high-intensity plaques than in those without that (P = 0.008; HR, 2.83, 95%CI, 1.27-4.87). The decline in the ability to perform daily activities and increased nursing home admission rates were high in elderly patients (P < 0.01). Although the mortality rate was higher in the elderly group, subsequent vascular events were comparable to that in the younger group. The results suggest that CEA and CAS are safe and useful treatments for carotid stenosis in older patients, especially to prevent ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
80 岁以上老年患者颈动脉内膜剥脱术和颈动脉支架植入术的临床意义。
随着平均寿命的延长,神经外科医生很可能会遇到 80 岁及以上的颈动脉狭窄患者;然而,高龄是否会影响颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)或颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)的临床治疗后效果,目前仍无定论。因此,本研究旨在评估 80 岁及以上患者接受 CEA 或 CAS 治疗后的效果。研究对象包括 80 岁以上的老年患者(34 人)和年轻患者(20 人)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Advanced Age and Hypoalbuminemia as Complication-related Mortality after 30 Days in Older Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Fluid Dynamics Simulation Analysis for Identifying Optimal Anastomosis Sites in Superficial Temporal Artery to Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass Surgery in Cerebrovascular Occlusive Disease. Clazosentan Affects Temporal Profile of Endothelin-A Expression in Macro- and Microcirculation after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Impact of Middle Cerebral Artery Branching Patterns on Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes for M1 Occlusion. Early Experiences with Robotic-assisted Implantation of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes in Awake or Asleep Patients in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1