Inter-reporter differences in symptom burdens in Japanese children with cancer.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies about inter-reporter differences and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in childhood cancer from Western countries showed that caregiver proxy reports tend to overestimate symptom burdens in comparison with children's self-reports. However, the results from Western countries may not be generalizable to Asian countries.

Methods: This paper is a secondary analysis of a validation study of the Japanese pediatric version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale including 88 dyads of children aged 7-12 years and 74 dyads of children aged 13-18 years and their caregivers. The study assessed the inter-reporter differences of eight and 31 symptom burdens calculated as symptom scores in children aged 7-12 years and 13-18 years, respectively, and the association between inter-reporter differences and the characteristics of children and caregivers.

Results: The majority of children and caregivers scored equally at the dyadic level for almost all symptoms. However, 37.5% of symptoms in children aged 7-12 years and 10.0% of symptoms in children aged 13-18 years showed significant inter-reporter differences, suggesting a general tendency of caregivers to underestimate their children's symptom burden. The caregiver's age was the characteristic most frequently associated with magnitude of inter-reporter differences.

Conclusions: Caregiver proxy reports may be a reliable source of PROs in Japanese children with cancer, as self-reported and caregiver proxy-reported symptom burdens were generally concordant. However, as some significant inter-reporter differences were observed, an effort should be made within the medical community to evaluate the parent-child relationship to minimize inter-reporter differences and achieve better symptom management.