Health-Economic Evaluation of Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Prevention: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20230101
Patricia Moreno-Peral, Sonia Conejo-Cerón, Ben Wijnen, Joran Lokkerbol, Anna Fernández, Filip Smit, Juan Ángel Bellón
{"title":"Health-Economic Evaluation of Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Prevention: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Patricia Moreno-Peral, Sonia Conejo-Cerón, Ben Wijnen, Joran Lokkerbol, Anna Fernández, Filip Smit, Juan Ángel Bellón","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although evidence supports the effectiveness of psychological interventions for prevention of anxiety, little is known about their cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of health-economic evaluations of psychological interventions for anxiety prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EconLit, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database, NHS Health Technology Assessment, and OpenGrey databases were searched electronically on December 23, 2022. Included studies focused on economic evaluations based on randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to prevent anxiety. Study data were extracted, and the quality of the selected studies was assessed by using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All included studies (N=5) had economic evaluations that were considered to be of good quality. In two studies, the interventions showed favorable cost-effectiveness compared with usual care groups. In one study, the intervention was not cost-effective. Findings from another study cast doubt on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in the remaining study could not be established.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the findings suggest some preliminary evidence of cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions for preventing anxiety, they were limited by the small number of included studies. Additional research on the cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions for anxiety in different countries and populations is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although evidence supports the effectiveness of psychological interventions for prevention of anxiety, little is known about their cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of health-economic evaluations of psychological interventions for anxiety prevention.

Methods: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EconLit, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database, NHS Health Technology Assessment, and OpenGrey databases were searched electronically on December 23, 2022. Included studies focused on economic evaluations based on randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to prevent anxiety. Study data were extracted, and the quality of the selected studies was assessed by using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

Results: All included studies (N=5) had economic evaluations that were considered to be of good quality. In two studies, the interventions showed favorable cost-effectiveness compared with usual care groups. In one study, the intervention was not cost-effective. Findings from another study cast doubt on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in the remaining study could not be established.

Conclusions: Although the findings suggest some preliminary evidence of cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions for preventing anxiety, they were limited by the small number of included studies. Additional research on the cost-effectiveness of psychological interventions for anxiety in different countries and populations is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防焦虑的心理干预的健康经济评估:系统回顾。
目的:尽管有证据支持心理干预对预防焦虑症的有效性,但对其成本效益却知之甚少。本研究旨在对预防焦虑症的心理干预措施的健康经济评估进行系统性回顾:于 2022 年 12 月 23 日对 PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、EconLit、National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluations Database、NHS Health Technology Assessment 和 OpenGrey 数据库进行了电子检索。纳入的研究主要是基于预防焦虑的心理干预随机对照试验的经济评估。提取了研究数据,并使用健康经济标准共识和科克伦偏倚风险工具评估了所选研究的质量:所有纳入研究(N=5)的经济评估均被认为质量良好。在两项研究中,与常规护理组相比,干预措施显示出良好的成本效益。在一项研究中,干预措施不具有成本效益。另一项研究的结果使人对干预措施的成本效益产生怀疑,其余研究中干预措施的成本效益无法确定:尽管研究结果表明,预防焦虑症的心理干预措施具有一定的成本效益,但由于纳入的研究数量较少,这些研究的成本效益受到了一定的限制。需要对不同国家和人群的焦虑症心理干预的成本效益进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
A Lived Experience Perspective in Suicide Prevention Research. State Policy Strategies for the Workforce Emergency in Behavioral Health. Employment Experiences and Employability of People in China Living With Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Study. Recovery Coach Program Implementation Across an Integrated Health System. Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Individuals With Versus Without Diagnosed Psychiatric Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1