Clinical utility of depression measures and symptoms: Implications for suicide risk assessment in high risk, resource limited youth populations.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13068
Collette Chapman-Hilliard, Tanisha Pelham, Victoria Mollo, Paulette Henry, Benjamin Miller, Joe Yankura, Ellen-Ge Denton
{"title":"Clinical utility of depression measures and symptoms: Implications for suicide risk assessment in high risk, resource limited youth populations.","authors":"Collette Chapman-Hilliard, Tanisha Pelham, Victoria Mollo, Paulette Henry, Benjamin Miller, Joe Yankura, Ellen-Ge Denton","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide risk for youth in resource- limited settings has been largely underrepresented in the literature and requires targeted examination of practical ways to address this growing public health concern. The present study focuses on the clinical utility of depression risk assessment tools addressing how and for whom suicide prevention intervention is most beneficial within a low-middle-income-country, high suicide risk youth sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Youth who reported a previous suicide attempt versus those who did not were criterion to test the validity of depression and hopelessness symptom assessment tools. We used item analyses to identify depressive symptom endorsements that most informed youth suicide risk, which will better equip rural practitioners for targeted intervention and monitoring of youth with an already high risk for suicide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings demonstrated that practitioners may target symptoms of social anhedonia, depressed mood, concentration disturbance, feelings of worthlessness, sleep disturbance, and fatigue for suicide prevention-intervention efforts among high-risk youth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study implications are for clinicians' use of the BDI-II and CES-D for depression symptom identification and suicide risk monitoring in settings with limited mental health infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Suicide risk for youth in resource- limited settings has been largely underrepresented in the literature and requires targeted examination of practical ways to address this growing public health concern. The present study focuses on the clinical utility of depression risk assessment tools addressing how and for whom suicide prevention intervention is most beneficial within a low-middle-income-country, high suicide risk youth sample.

Methods: Youth who reported a previous suicide attempt versus those who did not were criterion to test the validity of depression and hopelessness symptom assessment tools. We used item analyses to identify depressive symptom endorsements that most informed youth suicide risk, which will better equip rural practitioners for targeted intervention and monitoring of youth with an already high risk for suicide.

Results: Findings demonstrated that practitioners may target symptoms of social anhedonia, depressed mood, concentration disturbance, feelings of worthlessness, sleep disturbance, and fatigue for suicide prevention-intervention efforts among high-risk youth.

Conclusions: Study implications are for clinicians' use of the BDI-II and CES-D for depression symptom identification and suicide risk monitoring in settings with limited mental health infrastructure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症测量和症状的临床实用性:对高风险、资源有限的青少年群体进行自杀风险评估的意义。
目的:在资源有限的环境中,青少年的自杀风险在文献中基本上没有得到充分反映,因此需要对解决这一日益严重的公共卫生问题的实用方法进行有针对性的研究。本研究的重点是抑郁风险评估工具的临床实用性,探讨在一个中低收入国家的高自杀风险青少年样本中,如何以及对谁进行自杀预防干预最有益:方法:以曾报告自杀未遂的青少年和未报告自杀未遂的青少年为标准,测试抑郁和绝望症状评估工具的有效性。我们通过项目分析确定了最能反映青少年自杀风险的抑郁症状,这将更好地帮助农村从业人员对自杀风险已经很高的青少年进行有针对性的干预和监测:研究结果表明,从业人员可以针对社交厌恶、情绪低落、注意力不集中、无价值感、睡眠障碍和疲劳等症状对高危青少年进行自杀预防干预:该研究对临床医生在心理健康基础设施有限的环境中使用 BDI-II 和 CES-D 进行抑郁症状识别和自杀风险监测具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Predictors and patterns of suicidal ideation disclosures among American adults. Suicide decision-making: Differences in proximal considerations between individuals who aborted and attempted suicide. Nonresponse to an item assessing firearm ownership: Associations with suicide risk and emotional distress. Threat perceptions, defensive behaviors, and the perceived suicide prevention value of specific firearm storage practices. Participation in a daily diary study about suicide ideation yields no iatrogenic effects: A mixed method analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1