Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Nursing Students' Electronic Health Record Competency in Simulation.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Nursing Education Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240
Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson
{"title":"Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Nursing Students' Electronic Health Record Competency in Simulation.","authors":"Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47651,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.

Background: Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.

Method: The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.

Results: A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).

Conclusion: The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证用于评估护理专业学生电子健康记录模拟能力的工具。
目的:本研究旨在确定电子健康记录模拟能力评估(CASE)工具的可靠性和有效性:背景:有效的教学实践,包括对学生电子健康记录(EHR)能力进行有效、可靠的评估,有助于提供安全、优质、高效的护理服务:该研究采用混合方法设计来测试 CASE 工具的可靠性和有效性:来自 27 个州的大学教师为使用 CASE 工具的视频提供了具有全国代表性的样本分数。47 名参与者中的 22 人(47%)完成了第二轮评分。第一次和第二次回答的最终得分之间的类内相关性显示了测试-再测试可靠性的一致性(ICC = .78, p < .001):CASE 工具为评估模拟电子病历能力提供了有效性和可靠性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Education Perspectives
Nursing Education Perspectives EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A publication of the National League for Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that provides evidence for best practices in nursing education. Through the publication of rigorously designed studies, the journal contributes to the advancement of the science of nursing education. It serves as a forum for research and innovation regarding teaching and learning, curricula, technology, and other issues important to nursing education. Today, as nurse educators strive to advance research in nursing education and break away from established patterns and chart new pathways in nursing education, Nursing Education Perspectives is a vital resource. Nursing Education Perspectives is housed in the NLN Chamberlain College of Nursing for the Advancement of the Science of Nursing Education.
期刊最新文献
Speaking Up for Change: TED Talk Pedagogy for Teaching Health Advocacy in Nursing. Developing a Rural Health Certificate for Postbaccalaureate Nursing Students: Addressing Population Health and Rural Health Concepts. Predicting Academic Threat Appraisal: The Impact of Stress, Resilience, and Grit on First-Semester Nursing Students. Understanding How Nurse Faculty Advisors Perceive Voluntary Attrition Among 4-Year Baccalaureate Degree Nursing Students: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Assessing the Health of the Work Environment in Nursing Academia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1