Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Nursing Students' Electronic Health Record Competency in Simulation.

Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240

Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson

{"title":"Validation of a Tool to Evaluate Nursing Students' Electronic Health Record Competency in Simulation.","authors":"Susan McBride, Laura Thomas, Sharon Decker, Matthew Pierce, Shelley Burson, Huaxin Song, Katie Haerling Adamson","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.Background: Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.Method: The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.Results: A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).Conclusion: The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to establish reliability and validity of the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) tool.

Background: Effective teaching and learning practices, including valid and reliable assessment of students' electronic health record (EHR) competency, contribute to safe, high-quality, efficient nursing care.

Method: The study used a mixed-methods design to test reliability and validity of the CASE tool.

Results: A nationally representative sample of faculty from universities representing 27 states provided scores for videos using the CASE tool. Forty-seven participants completed the first scoring survey; 22 of the 47 participants (47%) completed the second-round scoring. Intraclass correlation for the final score between the first and second responses shows the consistency of test-retest reliability (ICC = .78, p < .001).

Conclusion: The CASE tool provided evidence of validity and reliability in evaluating EHR competency in simulation.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

验证用于评估护理专业学生电子健康记录模拟能力的工具。

目的：本研究旨在确定电子健康记录模拟能力评估（CASE）工具的可靠性和有效性：背景：有效的教学实践，包括对学生电子健康记录（EHR）能力进行有效、可靠的评估，有助于提供安全、优质、高效的护理服务：该研究采用混合方法设计来测试 CASE 工具的可靠性和有效性：来自 27 个州的大学教师为使用 CASE 工具的视频提供了具有全国代表性的样本分数。47 名参与者中的 22 人（47%）完成了第二轮评分。第一次和第二次回答的最终得分之间的类内相关性显示了测试-再测试可靠性的一致性（ICC = .78, p < .001）：CASE 工具为评估模拟电子病历能力提供了有效性和可靠性的证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助