Pre-Implementation Analysis of the Usability and Acceptability of a Poststroke Complex Telehealth Biofeedback Intervention.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.5014/ajot.2024.050501
Miranda Rennie Donnelly, Octavio Marin-Pardo, Aisha Abdullah, Coralie Phanord, Amisha Kumar, Stuti Chakraborty, Sook-Lei Liew
{"title":"Pre-Implementation Analysis of the Usability and Acceptability of a Poststroke Complex Telehealth Biofeedback Intervention.","authors":"Miranda Rennie Donnelly, Octavio Marin-Pardo, Aisha Abdullah, Coralie Phanord, Amisha Kumar, Stuti Chakraborty, Sook-Lei Liew","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Complex telehealth interventions can facilitate remote occupational therapy services and improve access for people living with chronic neurological conditions. Understanding the factors that influence the uptake of these technologies is important.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the fit between electromyography (EMG) biofeedback and telerehabilitation for stroke survivors, optimize EMG biofeedback interventions, and, more broadly, support other efforts to develop complex telerehabilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pre-implementation mixed-methods analysis of usability and acceptability data collected during a pilot and feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult stroke survivors with hemiparesis (N = 11; M age = 54 yr).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Game-based EMG biofeedback system for arm sensorimotor rehabilitation, delivered via telehealth.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model questionnaire, and semistructured interview. We coded the interview data using questionnaire constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants used an EMG biofeedback intervention at home. Quantitative measures show high levels of perceived usability and acceptability, supported by qualitative findings describing specific facilitators and barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Pre-implementation studies can improve the design and relevance of complex telehealth interventions. One major conclusion from this study is the influence of therapy providers on acceptability and usability of complex telehealth interventions. Plain-Language Summary: This study contributes to an emerging body of literature that examines the use of complex telehealth interventions with survivors of neurological injury. The findings highlight the value and support the development and use of complex telehealth interventions, which have the potential to improve remote access to occupational therapy for clients living with chronic neurological conditions. Complex telehealth interventions can open doors for survivors of neurological injury who face barriers to accessing occupational therapy and would benefit from technology-enabled therapy at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Complex telehealth interventions can facilitate remote occupational therapy services and improve access for people living with chronic neurological conditions. Understanding the factors that influence the uptake of these technologies is important.

Objective: To explore the fit between electromyography (EMG) biofeedback and telerehabilitation for stroke survivors, optimize EMG biofeedback interventions, and, more broadly, support other efforts to develop complex telerehabilitation interventions.

Design: Pre-implementation mixed-methods analysis of usability and acceptability data collected during a pilot and feasibility study.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Adult stroke survivors with hemiparesis (N = 11; M age = 54 yr).

Intervention: Game-based EMG biofeedback system for arm sensorimotor rehabilitation, delivered via telehealth.

Outcomes and measures: Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model questionnaire, and semistructured interview. We coded the interview data using questionnaire constructs.

Results: Participants used an EMG biofeedback intervention at home. Quantitative measures show high levels of perceived usability and acceptability, supported by qualitative findings describing specific facilitators and barriers.

Conclusions and relevance: Pre-implementation studies can improve the design and relevance of complex telehealth interventions. One major conclusion from this study is the influence of therapy providers on acceptability and usability of complex telehealth interventions. Plain-Language Summary: This study contributes to an emerging body of literature that examines the use of complex telehealth interventions with survivors of neurological injury. The findings highlight the value and support the development and use of complex telehealth interventions, which have the potential to improve remote access to occupational therapy for clients living with chronic neurological conditions. Complex telehealth interventions can open doors for survivors of neurological injury who face barriers to accessing occupational therapy and would benefit from technology-enabled therapy at home.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风后复杂远程健康生物反馈干预的可用性和可接受性实施前分析。
重要性:复杂的远程保健干预措施可促进远程职业治疗服务,并改善慢性神经系统疾病患者的就医条件。了解影响这些技术使用的因素非常重要:探索肌电图(EMG)生物反馈与中风幸存者远程康复之间的契合点,优化EMG生物反馈干预措施,并从更广泛的角度支持其他开发复杂远程康复干预措施的工作:设计:对试点和可行性研究中收集的可用性和可接受性数据进行实施前混合方法分析:环境:社区:干预措施:干预措施:通过远程医疗提供基于游戏的 EMG 生物反馈系统,用于手臂感觉运动康复:研究后系统可用性问卷、技术接受和使用统一理论模型扩展问卷以及半结构式访谈。我们使用问卷的结构对访谈数据进行了编码:结果:参与者在家中使用肌电生物反馈干预。定量测量结果显示,感知可用性和可接受性水平较高,定性结果描述了具体的促进因素和障碍:实施前研究可以改进复杂的远程保健干预措施的设计和相关性。本研究的一个主要结论是治疗提供者对复杂远程保健干预措施的可接受性和可用性的影响。通俗摘要:本研究为研究神经损伤幸存者使用复杂远程保健干预措施的新兴文献做出了贡献。研究结果凸显了复杂远程保健干预措施的价值,并支持其开发和使用,这些措施有可能改善患有慢性神经系统疾病的患者远程获得职业治疗的机会。复杂的远程保健干预措施可以为面临职业治疗障碍的神经损伤幸存者打开方便之门,使他们在家中就能从技术辅助治疗中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
期刊最新文献
Educating the Educator: Applying a Growth Mindset Approach to Prepare Educators for Major Changes in Occupational Therapy Education. Predictive Factors of State Licensure Board Disciplinary Actions in Occupational Therapy. The Hand Accumulation aNd Dexterity FUnctional Limits-Shriners (HANDFULS): A New Clinically Feasible Measure of Hand Volume and In-Hand Manipulation for Children. Bimanual Arm Trainer Versus Traditional Occupational Therapy Services in Upper Extremity Function. Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1