The studying of magnetic anomalies due to shallow underground targets and the environmental applications

Joseph Omeiza Alao, Kolawole Muyideen Lawal, Bala Bello Muhammad Dewu, Jimoh Raimi
{"title":"The studying of magnetic anomalies due to shallow underground targets and the environmental applications","authors":"Joseph Omeiza Alao,&nbsp;Kolawole Muyideen Lawal,&nbsp;Bala Bello Muhammad Dewu,&nbsp;Jimoh Raimi","doi":"10.1016/j.rines.2024.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The magnetic method of investigation is a well-known and dependable technique for detecting underground ferro-materials. However, the application of the magnetic method to identify the exact position of underground targets such as buried explosive devices (BED), illegally buried waste (IBW), metallic storage tanks, utility pipes, and communication cables is quite challenging in both civil and environmental engineering. This article presents the results of the investigation performed at a 55 m by 55 m area within the Ahmadu Bello University Geophysical Test Site (ABUGTS) to study the signals generated by various buried targets to simulate similar situations encountered in environmental engineering. The total magnetic intensity (TMI) of the site without buried targets was obtained to identify the possible existing underground materials or faults that could generate false geophysical data. The magnetic susceptibility of the buried targets was determined in the laboratory before the burial to validate the field results. The influence of the buried materials over the magnetic signature of the site was examined, showing the TMI values vary between 34966 nT and 44510 nT before burial and 351607 nT to 49795 nT after burial. The Euler deconvolution (ED) and residual maps alongside the signal enhancement maps like analytical signal and first vertical derivative (FVD) were employed to study the magnetic anomalies due to buried targets. The results of the data interpretation confirmed the existence of cluster anomaly source bodies due to buried targets. The ED delineates the depth of the buried targets varying between 0.7 m – 3.3 m corresponding with the actual depth of burial. The analytical signal map produced a perfect behaviour of the magnetic anomalies to buried targets, capturing all the buried targets buried at the site. However, the shape of the anomaly signal is almost independent of the buried target orientation with a spherical pattern of anomalies. However, the exact size and shape of the buried targets were not achieved. Nevertheless, the FVD and analytical signal maps perform better than the residual and TMI maps due to the substantially smaller magnetic anomalies of the buried targets similar to expected. In addition, stronger magnetic anomaly signals occur maximally around buried larger ferro-materials with precise prediction of the buried target position. The magnetic method is a very powerful, convenient, cheap, and time-saving geophysical tool for investigating underground targets, which is highly applicable in engineering and environmental contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101084,"journal":{"name":"Results in Earth Sciences","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714824000037/pdfft?md5=bd795257bef95ef0573e30d78f735eef&pid=1-s2.0-S2211714824000037-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714824000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The magnetic method of investigation is a well-known and dependable technique for detecting underground ferro-materials. However, the application of the magnetic method to identify the exact position of underground targets such as buried explosive devices (BED), illegally buried waste (IBW), metallic storage tanks, utility pipes, and communication cables is quite challenging in both civil and environmental engineering. This article presents the results of the investigation performed at a 55 m by 55 m area within the Ahmadu Bello University Geophysical Test Site (ABUGTS) to study the signals generated by various buried targets to simulate similar situations encountered in environmental engineering. The total magnetic intensity (TMI) of the site without buried targets was obtained to identify the possible existing underground materials or faults that could generate false geophysical data. The magnetic susceptibility of the buried targets was determined in the laboratory before the burial to validate the field results. The influence of the buried materials over the magnetic signature of the site was examined, showing the TMI values vary between 34966 nT and 44510 nT before burial and 351607 nT to 49795 nT after burial. The Euler deconvolution (ED) and residual maps alongside the signal enhancement maps like analytical signal and first vertical derivative (FVD) were employed to study the magnetic anomalies due to buried targets. The results of the data interpretation confirmed the existence of cluster anomaly source bodies due to buried targets. The ED delineates the depth of the buried targets varying between 0.7 m – 3.3 m corresponding with the actual depth of burial. The analytical signal map produced a perfect behaviour of the magnetic anomalies to buried targets, capturing all the buried targets buried at the site. However, the shape of the anomaly signal is almost independent of the buried target orientation with a spherical pattern of anomalies. However, the exact size and shape of the buried targets were not achieved. Nevertheless, the FVD and analytical signal maps perform better than the residual and TMI maps due to the substantially smaller magnetic anomalies of the buried targets similar to expected. In addition, stronger magnetic anomaly signals occur maximally around buried larger ferro-materials with precise prediction of the buried target position. The magnetic method is a very powerful, convenient, cheap, and time-saving geophysical tool for investigating underground targets, which is highly applicable in engineering and environmental contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浅层地下目标磁异常的研究与环境应用
磁力勘探法是一种众所周知的、可靠的探测地下铁质材料的技术。然而,在土木工程和环境工程中,应用磁法确定地下目标(如埋藏的爆炸装置 (BED)、非法埋藏的废物 (IBW)、金属储罐、公用管道和通信电缆)的确切位置是一项相当具有挑战性的工作。本文介绍了在艾哈迈杜-贝洛大学地球物理试验场(ABUGTS)内 55 米乘 55 米区域进行的调查结果,该试验场研究了各种埋藏目标产生的信号,以模拟环境工程中遇到的类似情况。获得了没有埋设目标的场地的总磁感应强度 (TMI),以确定可能存在的地下材料或断层,从而产生错误的地球物理数据。在掩埋之前,在实验室测定了掩埋目标的磁感应强度,以验证现场结果。结果显示,埋藏前的磁感应强度值介于 34966 nT 和 44510 nT 之间,埋藏后介于 351607 nT 和 49795 nT 之间。欧拉解卷积(ED)和残差图以及信号增强图(如分析信号和第一次垂直导数(FVD))被用来研究埋藏目标引起的磁异常。数据解释结果证实了埋藏目标导致的群集异常源体的存在。ED 根据实际埋藏深度划定了 0.7 米至 3.3 米不等的目标埋藏深度。分析信号图显示了磁异常与埋藏目标之间的完美关系,捕捉到了现场埋藏的所有埋藏目标。不过,异常信号的形状几乎与埋藏目标的方位无关,呈球形异常模式。但是,无法获得埋藏目标的确切大小和形状。尽管如此,FVD 和分析信号图的表现优于残余图和 TMI 图,这是因为埋藏目标的磁异常大大缩小,与预期的相似。此外,较强的磁异常信号最大程度地出现在埋藏的较大铁质材料周围,可精确预测埋藏目标的位置。磁法是一种非常强大、方便、廉价和省时的地球物理工具,可用于调查地下目标,在工程和环境方面非常适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the use of displaced river terraces to characterize active tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt, SW Iran Multi-criteria assessment of PDGLs for GLOFs hazards in the Bhut and Warwan sub-basins of the Chenab basin, Northwestern Himalaya Geo-electrical investigation for groundwater reserves in the Boranakanive Reservoir Catchment in Tumkur district, Karnataka, India Reliability analysis of support strategies in tunnel construction: Insights from geomechanical analysis of jointed rock masses Exploring the unintended contribution of soil erosion research to microplastic contamination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1