Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Micah K de Valle, Michael Adkison, Ruhi Maredia, Cooper Stevenson, Shobana Murugan
{"title":"Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis","authors":"Micah K de Valle, Michael Adkison, Ruhi Maredia, Cooper Stevenson, Shobana Murugan","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.25.24303333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nLocal Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) is a rare complication of regional anesthesia. Pregnancy is a risk factor due to gestational physiologic changes. Labor and disorders of pregnancy can mask or delay symptoms of LAST, slowing appropriate intervention. This study examines LAST within a larger cohort and identifies features that help distinguish LAST in pregnancy from nonpregnant patients.\nMethods The TriNetX database was used to compare pregnant and nonpregnant patients with LAST from 2013 to 2023. Cohorts were matched on age, race, obesity status, diabetes, metabolic disorders, local anesthetic type, and cardiovascular, liver, kidney, and respiratory disease. Outcomes included prodromal symptoms of LAST and symptoms of cardiac and central nervous system excitation and depression.\nResults Matching occurred for 276 pregnant and 276 nonpregnant patients. Pregnant cohorts had a significantly higher risk of cardiac depression (RR, 1.96 [95% CI 1.44 - 2.66], p<0.01) and significantly lower risk of cardiac excitation (RR, 0.38 [95% CI 0.22-0.63], p<0.01), prodromal symptoms (RR, 0.17 [95% CI 0.09 - 0.33], p<0.01), central nervous system excitation (RR, 0.44 [95% CI 0.21-0.90], p=0.02), and central nervous system depression (RR, 0.24 [95% CI 0.13-0.48], p<0.01) than nonpregnant cohorts.\nConclusion\nPregnant patients with LAST were more likely to exhibit cardiac depression and less likely to manifest prodromal symptoms, cardiac excitation, and central nervous system excitation and depression than nonpregnant patients. Physiological changes during pregnancy and prompt detection and treatment may explain these differences. These findings highlight the variable nature of LAST and how pregnancy may influence its clinical presentation.","PeriodicalId":501303,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.25.24303333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) is a rare complication of regional anesthesia. Pregnancy is a risk factor due to gestational physiologic changes. Labor and disorders of pregnancy can mask or delay symptoms of LAST, slowing appropriate intervention. This study examines LAST within a larger cohort and identifies features that help distinguish LAST in pregnancy from nonpregnant patients. Methods The TriNetX database was used to compare pregnant and nonpregnant patients with LAST from 2013 to 2023. Cohorts were matched on age, race, obesity status, diabetes, metabolic disorders, local anesthetic type, and cardiovascular, liver, kidney, and respiratory disease. Outcomes included prodromal symptoms of LAST and symptoms of cardiac and central nervous system excitation and depression. Results Matching occurred for 276 pregnant and 276 nonpregnant patients. Pregnant cohorts had a significantly higher risk of cardiac depression (RR, 1.96 [95% CI 1.44 - 2.66], p<0.01) and significantly lower risk of cardiac excitation (RR, 0.38 [95% CI 0.22-0.63], p<0.01), prodromal symptoms (RR, 0.17 [95% CI 0.09 - 0.33], p<0.01), central nervous system excitation (RR, 0.44 [95% CI 0.21-0.90], p=0.02), and central nervous system depression (RR, 0.24 [95% CI 0.13-0.48], p<0.01) than nonpregnant cohorts. Conclusion Pregnant patients with LAST were more likely to exhibit cardiac depression and less likely to manifest prodromal symptoms, cardiac excitation, and central nervous system excitation and depression than nonpregnant patients. Physiological changes during pregnancy and prompt detection and treatment may explain these differences. These findings highlight the variable nature of LAST and how pregnancy may influence its clinical presentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期局麻药全身毒性:回顾性队列分析
导言局部麻醉系统毒性(LAST)是局部麻醉的一种罕见并发症。由于妊娠期的生理变化,妊娠是一个危险因素。分娩和妊娠紊乱可掩盖或延迟 LAST 的症状,从而延缓适当的干预。本研究在一个较大的队列中对 LAST 进行了检查,并确定了有助于区分妊娠与非妊娠患者 LAST 的特征。组群在年龄、种族、肥胖状况、糖尿病、代谢紊乱、局麻药类型以及心血管、肝脏、肾脏和呼吸系统疾病方面进行了匹配。结果包括 LAST 的前驱症状以及心脏和中枢神经系统兴奋和抑制症状。孕妇组群的心脏抑郁风险明显更高(RR,1.96 [95% CI 1.44 - 2.66],p<0.01),而心脏兴奋风险明显更低(RR,0.38 [95% CI 0.22-0.63],p<0.01)、前驱症状(RR,0.17 [95% CI 0.09-0.33],p<0.01)、中枢神经系统兴奋(RR,0.44 [95% CI 0.21-0.90],p=0.结论与非妊娠患者相比,LAST 妊娠患者更有可能表现出心脏抑郁,而较少表现出前驱症状、心脏兴奋、中枢神经系统兴奋和抑郁。妊娠期间的生理变化以及及时发现和治疗可能是造成这些差异的原因。这些发现凸显了 LAST 的多变性以及妊娠如何影响其临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electroencephalographic (EEG) Changes Accompanying Normal Breathing of Concentrated Oxygen (Hyperoxic Ventilation) by Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review Efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and mannitol in managing chronic post-thoracotomy pain in patients with lung cancer: Study protocol for a single center prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial Effect of intermittent pringle manipulation on serum potassium concentration during laparoscopic hepatectomy: a self-controlled study protocol Rationale of acupuncture for stabilizing blood pressure fluctuation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (ASBP): a parallel grouped, randomized clinical trial Regional Anesthesia in Intensive Care: An Overview in Tunisia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1