The association of ethnicity and oncologic outcomes for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)

Kiana Mahboubi, Steven Nakoneshny, Khara Sauro, Robert Hart, Thomas Wayne Matthews, Joseph Dort, Shamir Chandarana
{"title":"The association of ethnicity and oncologic outcomes for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)","authors":"Kiana Mahboubi, Steven Nakoneshny, Khara Sauro, Robert Hart, Thomas Wayne Matthews, Joseph Dort, Shamir Chandarana","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.25.24303341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare oncologic outcomes of South Asian (SA) patients treated at a regional cancer centre in Canada, for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), to the general population. Methods: Adult patients who underwent primary surgical resection of OSCC +/- adjuvant treatment between 2009 and 2022 (N=697) were included. SA patients were identified using a validated method and compared to non-SA patients. Baseline characteristics, including betel nut consumption, were compared, and disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with median follow-up time of 36.4 months [SD 31.02]. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for potential confounders. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\nResults: SA patients (9% of cohort, n = 64) were significantly younger and had lower rates of smoking and alcohol consumption compared to non-SA patients. There were no differences in tumor characteristics or the use of adjuvant radiation. SA patients had a two-fold higher risk of recurrence and significantly worse disease-specific survival, even after adjusting for stage and high-risk features [RFS: HR 2.01(1.28 - 3.14), DSS: HR 1.79(1.12 - 2.88)]. The consumption of betel nut was not associated with outcomes.\nConclusion: To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare the oncological outcomes of SA patients with OSCC to non-SA patients. SA patients had significantly worse outcomes, even after controlling for known predictors of recurrence and disease-specific survival. These findings can inform personalized treatment decisions and influence public health policies when managing patients with different ethnic backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":501185,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.25.24303341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare oncologic outcomes of South Asian (SA) patients treated at a regional cancer centre in Canada, for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), to the general population. Methods: Adult patients who underwent primary surgical resection of OSCC +/- adjuvant treatment between 2009 and 2022 (N=697) were included. SA patients were identified using a validated method and compared to non-SA patients. Baseline characteristics, including betel nut consumption, were compared, and disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with median follow-up time of 36.4 months [SD 31.02]. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for potential confounders. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: SA patients (9% of cohort, n = 64) were significantly younger and had lower rates of smoking and alcohol consumption compared to non-SA patients. There were no differences in tumor characteristics or the use of adjuvant radiation. SA patients had a two-fold higher risk of recurrence and significantly worse disease-specific survival, even after adjusting for stage and high-risk features [RFS: HR 2.01(1.28 - 3.14), DSS: HR 1.79(1.12 - 2.88)]. The consumption of betel nut was not associated with outcomes. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare the oncological outcomes of SA patients with OSCC to non-SA patients. SA patients had significantly worse outcomes, even after controlling for known predictors of recurrence and disease-specific survival. These findings can inform personalized treatment decisions and influence public health policies when managing patients with different ethnic backgrounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族与口腔鳞状细胞癌 (OSCC) 肿瘤治疗效果的关系
目的比较在加拿大一家地区癌症中心接受治疗的南亚(SA)口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者与普通人群的肿瘤治疗效果。方法:在加拿大的一个地区性癌症中心接受原发性口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)手术的成年患者与普通人群的肿瘤治疗效果进行比较:纳入2009年至2022年期间接受OSCC初级手术切除+/-辅助治疗的成年患者(N=697)。采用一种经过验证的方法确定槟榔病患者,并与非槟榔病患者进行比较。比较了包括槟榔摄入量在内的基线特征,并采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估了疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无复发生存期(RFS),中位随访时间为 36.4 个月 [SD 31.02]。Cox比例危险回归模型对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。P值大于0.05为具有统计学意义:与非SA患者相比,SA患者(占队列的9%,n = 64)明显更年轻,吸烟和饮酒的比例也更低。肿瘤特征和辅助放射治疗的使用情况没有差异。即使对分期和高危特征进行调整后,SA 患者的复发风险高出两倍,疾病特异性生存率也明显降低[RFS:HR 2.01(1.28 - 3.14),DSS:HR 1.79(1.12 - 2.88)]。食用槟榔与结果无关:据我们所知,这项研究首次比较了SA型OSCC患者与非SA型患者的肿瘤预后。即使控制了已知的复发预测因素和疾病特异性生存率,SA 患者的预后也明显较差。这些发现可以为个性化治疗决策提供依据,并在管理不同种族背景的患者时影响公共卫生政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a virtual Endoscopic Surgery Planning system to optimize surgical outcomes Age distribution characteristics of 1915 cases of otitis media with effusion in children Effectiveness of bimodal neuromodulation for tinnitus treatment in a real-world clinical setting in United States: A retrospective chart review Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini as sources of references in otorhinolaryngology AIR-CONDUCTION AND BONE-CONDUCTION REFERENCE THRESHOLD LEVELS: A MULTICENTER STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1