Trusting Talent: Cross-Country Differences in Hiring

IF 8.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Administrative Science Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1177/00018392241233257
Letian Zhang, Shinan Wang
{"title":"Trusting Talent: Cross-Country Differences in Hiring","authors":"Letian Zhang, Shinan Wang","doi":"10.1177/00018392241233257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that a society’s level of social trust influences employers’ hiring strategies. Employers can focus either on applicants’ potential and select on foundational skills (e.g., social skills, math skills) or on their readiness and select on more-advanced skills (e.g., pricing a derivative). The higher (lower) the social trust—people’s trust in their fellow members of society—the more (less) employers are willing to invest in employees and grant them role flexibility. Employers in higher-trust societies are therefore more attentive to applicants’ potential, focusing more on foundational skills than on advanced skills. We empirically test this theory by using a novel dataset of more than 50 million job postings from the 28 European Union countries. We find that the higher a country’s social trust, the more its employers require foundational skills instead of advanced skills. Our identification strategy takes advantage of multinational firms in our sample and uses measures of bilateral (country-to-country) trust to predict job requirements, while including an instrumental variable and fixed effects on country, year, employer, and occupation. These findings suggest a novel pathway by which social trust shapes employment practices and organizational strategies.","PeriodicalId":7203,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Science Quarterly","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Science Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392241233257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that a society’s level of social trust influences employers’ hiring strategies. Employers can focus either on applicants’ potential and select on foundational skills (e.g., social skills, math skills) or on their readiness and select on more-advanced skills (e.g., pricing a derivative). The higher (lower) the social trust—people’s trust in their fellow members of society—the more (less) employers are willing to invest in employees and grant them role flexibility. Employers in higher-trust societies are therefore more attentive to applicants’ potential, focusing more on foundational skills than on advanced skills. We empirically test this theory by using a novel dataset of more than 50 million job postings from the 28 European Union countries. We find that the higher a country’s social trust, the more its employers require foundational skills instead of advanced skills. Our identification strategy takes advantage of multinational firms in our sample and uses measures of bilateral (country-to-country) trust to predict job requirements, while including an instrumental variable and fixed effects on country, year, employer, and occupation. These findings suggest a novel pathway by which social trust shapes employment practices and organizational strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任人才:跨国招聘差异
本文认为,一个社会的社会信任度会影响雇主的招聘策略。雇主既可以关注求职者的潜力,从基础技能(如社交技能、数学技能)方面进行选择,也可以关注求职者的准备情况,从更高级的技能(如衍生品定价)方面进行选择。社会信任度越高(越低)--人们对社会成员的信任度越高(越低)--雇主就越愿意投资于员工,并给予他们角色灵活性。因此,在信任度较高的社会中,雇主会更关注求职者的潜力,更注重基础技能而非高级技能。我们通过使用来自 28 个欧盟国家的 5000 多万条招聘信息的新数据集,对这一理论进行了实证检验。我们发现,一个国家的社会信任度越高,其雇主就越需要基础技能,而不是高级技能。我们的识别策略利用了样本中跨国公司的优势,并使用双边(国家对国家)信任的衡量标准来预测职位要求,同时包括工具变量以及国家、年份、雇主和职业的固定效应。这些发现为社会信任影响就业实践和组织战略提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Administrative Science Quarterly, under the ownership and management of the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University, has consistently been a pioneer in organizational studies since the inception of the field. As a premier journal, it consistently features the finest theoretical and empirical papers derived from dissertations, along with the latest contributions from well-established scholars. Additionally, the journal showcases interdisciplinary work in organizational theory and offers insightful book reviews.
期刊最新文献
This Is Why I Leave: Race and Voluntary Departure The Dynamics of Inferential Interpretation in Experiential Learning: Deciphering Hidden Goals from Ambiguous Experience Christina Lubinski. Navigating Nationalism in Global Enterprise: A Century of Indo-German Business Relations Falling Fortunes: The Contingent and Asymmetric Effect of Rankings on Organizational Outcomes Michel Anteby. The Interloper: Lessons from Resistance in the Field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1