Access to telehealth and changes in diabetes care patterns during the pandemic: evidence from a large integrated health system in the Southeast USA.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882
Sofia A Oviedo, Bennett McDonald, Jennifer C Gander, Mohammed K Ali, Jessica L Harding
{"title":"Access to telehealth and changes in diabetes care patterns during the pandemic: evidence from a large integrated health system in the Southeast USA.","authors":"Sofia A Oviedo, Bennett McDonald, Jennifer C Gander, Mohammed K Ali, Jessica L Harding","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To examine the role of telehealth in diabetes care and management during versus pre-COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included adults (≥18 years) with prevalent diabetes as of January 1, 2018, and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Georgia through December 31, 2021 (n=22,854). We defined pre (2018-2019) and during COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed the within-subject change in adherence to seven annual routine care processes (blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), cholesterol, creatinine, urine-albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), eye and foot examinations) pre versus during COVID-19 among telehealth users (ie, more than one telehealth visit per year per period) and non-telehealth users. Linear GEE compared mean laboratory measurements pre versus during COVID-19 by telehealth use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of telehealth users increased from 38.7% (2018-2019) to 91.5% (2020-2021). During (vs pre) the pandemic, adherence to all care processes declined in telehealth (range: 1.6% for foot examinations to 12.4% for BP) and non-telehealth users (range: 1.9% for foot examinations to 40.7% for BP). In telehealth users, average HbA1c (mean difference: 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.6%), systolic BP (1.62 mm Hg (1.44 to 1.81)), and creatinine (0.03 mg/dL (0.02 to 0.04)), worsened during (vs pre) COVID-19, while low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol improved (-9.08 mg/dL (-9.77 to -8.39)). For UACR, odds of elevated risk of kidney disease increased by 48% (OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62)). Patterns were similar in non-telehealth users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth use increased during the pandemic and alleviated some of the observed declines in routine diabetes care and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To examine the role of telehealth in diabetes care and management during versus pre-COVID-19 pandemic.

Research design and methods: We included adults (≥18 years) with prevalent diabetes as of January 1, 2018, and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Georgia through December 31, 2021 (n=22,854). We defined pre (2018-2019) and during COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed the within-subject change in adherence to seven annual routine care processes (blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), cholesterol, creatinine, urine-albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), eye and foot examinations) pre versus during COVID-19 among telehealth users (ie, more than one telehealth visit per year per period) and non-telehealth users. Linear GEE compared mean laboratory measurements pre versus during COVID-19 by telehealth use.

Results: The proportion of telehealth users increased from 38.7% (2018-2019) to 91.5% (2020-2021). During (vs pre) the pandemic, adherence to all care processes declined in telehealth (range: 1.6% for foot examinations to 12.4% for BP) and non-telehealth users (range: 1.9% for foot examinations to 40.7% for BP). In telehealth users, average HbA1c (mean difference: 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.6%), systolic BP (1.62 mm Hg (1.44 to 1.81)), and creatinine (0.03 mg/dL (0.02 to 0.04)), worsened during (vs pre) COVID-19, while low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol improved (-9.08 mg/dL (-9.77 to -8.39)). For UACR, odds of elevated risk of kidney disease increased by 48% (OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62)). Patterns were similar in non-telehealth users.

Conclusions: Telehealth use increased during the pandemic and alleviated some of the observed declines in routine diabetes care and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间远程医疗的可及性和糖尿病护理模式的变化:来自美国东南部一个大型综合医疗系统的证据。
引言研究设计与方法:我们纳入了截至 2018 年 1 月 1 日患有流行性糖尿病,并在 2021 年 12 月 31 日之前在 Kaiser Permanente Georgia 连续注册的成人(≥18 岁)(n=22854)。我们定义了 COVID-19 之前(2018-2019 年)和期间(2020-2021 年)。逻辑广义估计方程 (GEE) 评估了远程医疗用户(即在每个时期每年进行一次以上远程医疗就诊)和非远程医疗用户在 COVID-19 前与 COVID-19 期间在遵守七项年度常规护理流程(血压 (BP)、血红蛋白 A1C (HbA1c)、胆固醇、肌酐、尿-白蛋白-肌酐比值 (UACR)、眼部和足部检查)方面的受试者内变化。线性 GEE 比较了 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 期间按远程保健使用情况分列的平均实验室测量结果:远程保健用户的比例从 38.7%(2018-2019 年)增至 91.5%(2020-2021 年)。大流行期间(与大流行前相比),远程医疗用户(范围:足部检查为 1.6%,血压为 12.4%)和非远程医疗用户(范围:足部检查为 1.9%,血压为 40.7%)对所有护理流程的依从性均有所下降。在远程保健用户中,平均 HbA1c(平均差异为 0.4% (95% C)在 COVID-19 期间(与 COVID-19 之前相比),平均 HbA1c(平均差异:0.4%(95% CI 0.2% 至 0.6%))、收缩压(1.62 毫米汞柱(1.44 至 1.81))和肌酐(0.03 毫克/分升(0.02 至 0.04))有所恶化,而低密度脂蛋白 (LDL) 胆固醇有所改善(-9.08 毫克/分升(-9.77 至 -8.39))。就 UACR 而言,肾病风险升高的几率增加了 48%(OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62))。非远程保健用户的情况与此类似:结论:大流行期间,远程医疗的使用有所增加,缓解了常规糖尿病护理和管理中观察到的一些下降趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
期刊最新文献
Association between RDW-SD and prognosis across glycemic status in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Widening the phenotypic spectrum caused by pathogenic PDX1 variants in individuals with neonatal diabetes. Identification of atypical pediatric diabetes mellitus cases using electronic medical records. Type 2 diabetes complications in ethnic minority compared with European host populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of weight-maintaining ketogenic diet on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in obese T2D subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1