Artificial intelligence-assisted system for the assessment of Forrest classification of peptic ulcer bleeding: a multicenter diagnostic study.

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ACS Chemical Biology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2252-4874
Xiao-Jian He, Xiao-Ling Wang, Tian-Kang Su, Li-Jia Yao, Jing Zheng, Xiao-Dong Wen, Qin-Wei Xu, Qian-Rong Huang, Li-Bin Chen, Chang-Xin Chen, Hai-Fan Lin, Yi-Qun Chen, Yan-Xing Hu, Kai-Hua Zhang, Chuan-Shen Jiang, Gang Liu, Da-Zhou Li, Dong-Liang Li, Wang Wen
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-assisted system for the assessment of Forrest classification of peptic ulcer bleeding: a multicenter diagnostic study.","authors":"Xiao-Jian He, Xiao-Ling Wang, Tian-Kang Su, Li-Jia Yao, Jing Zheng, Xiao-Dong Wen, Qin-Wei Xu, Qian-Rong Huang, Li-Bin Chen, Chang-Xin Chen, Hai-Fan Lin, Yi-Qun Chen, Yan-Xing Hu, Kai-Hua Zhang, Chuan-Shen Jiang, Gang Liu, Da-Zhou Li, Dong-Liang Li, Wang Wen","doi":"10.1055/a-2252-4874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inaccurate Forrest classification may significantly affect clinical outcomes, especially in high risk patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a real-time deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) system to assess the Forrest classification of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A training dataset (3868 endoscopic images) and an internal validation dataset (834 images) were retrospectively collected from the 900th Hospital, Fuzhou, China. In addition, 521 images collected from four other hospitals were used for external validation. Finally, 46 endoscopic videos were prospectively collected to assess the real-time diagnostic performance of the DCNN system, whose diagnostic performance was also prospectively compared with that of three senior and three junior endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DCNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the assessment of Forrest classification, with an accuracy of 91.2% (95%CI 89.5%-92.6%) and a macro-average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 in the validation dataset. Moreover, the DCNN system could judge suspicious regions automatically using Forrest classification in real-time videos, with an accuracy of 92.0% (95%CI 80.8%-97.8%). The DCNN system showed more accurate and stable diagnostic performance than endoscopists in the prospective clinical comparison test. This system helped to slightly improve the diagnostic performance of senior endoscopists and considerably enhance that of junior endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DCNN system for the assessment of the Forrest classification of PUB showed satisfactory diagnostic performance, which was slightly superior to that of senior endoscopists. It could therefore effectively assist junior endoscopists in making such diagnoses during gastroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2252-4874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inaccurate Forrest classification may significantly affect clinical outcomes, especially in high risk patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a real-time deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) system to assess the Forrest classification of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB).

Methods: A training dataset (3868 endoscopic images) and an internal validation dataset (834 images) were retrospectively collected from the 900th Hospital, Fuzhou, China. In addition, 521 images collected from four other hospitals were used for external validation. Finally, 46 endoscopic videos were prospectively collected to assess the real-time diagnostic performance of the DCNN system, whose diagnostic performance was also prospectively compared with that of three senior and three junior endoscopists.

Results: The DCNN system had a satisfactory diagnostic performance in the assessment of Forrest classification, with an accuracy of 91.2% (95%CI 89.5%-92.6%) and a macro-average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 in the validation dataset. Moreover, the DCNN system could judge suspicious regions automatically using Forrest classification in real-time videos, with an accuracy of 92.0% (95%CI 80.8%-97.8%). The DCNN system showed more accurate and stable diagnostic performance than endoscopists in the prospective clinical comparison test. This system helped to slightly improve the diagnostic performance of senior endoscopists and considerably enhance that of junior endoscopists.

Conclusion: The DCNN system for the assessment of the Forrest classification of PUB showed satisfactory diagnostic performance, which was slightly superior to that of senior endoscopists. It could therefore effectively assist junior endoscopists in making such diagnoses during gastroscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估福雷斯特消化性溃疡出血分类的人工智能辅助系统:一项多中心诊断研究。
背景:不准确的福瑞斯特分类可能会严重影响临床结果,尤其是高危患者。因此,本研究旨在开发一种实时深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)系统,以评估消化性溃疡出血(PUB)的福里斯特分类:训练数据集(3868 张内镜图像)和内部验证数据集(834 张图像)均来自中国福州第 900 医院。此外,还从其他四家医院收集了 521 幅图像用于外部验证。最后,为了评估 DCNN 系统的实时诊断性能,前瞻性地收集了 46 个内窥镜视频,并将其诊断性能与三名高级和三名初级内窥镜医师的诊断性能进行了前瞻性比较:结果:DCNN 系统在福雷斯特分类评估中的诊断性能令人满意,在验证数据集中的准确率为 91.2%(95%CI 89.5%-92.6%),接收器操作特征曲线下的宏观平均面积为 0.80。此外,DCNN 系统还能在实时视频中使用 Forrest 分类自动判断可疑区域,准确率为 92.0%(95%CI 80.8%-97.8%)。在前瞻性临床对比测试中,DCNN 系统显示出比内镜医师更准确、更稳定的诊断性能。该系统有助于略微提高资深内镜医师的诊断性能,并显著提高初级内镜医师的诊断性能:结论:DCNN 系统对 PUB 的福雷斯特分类评估显示出令人满意的诊断性能,略高于资深内镜医师的诊断性能。因此,它能有效地帮助初级内镜医师在胃镜检查中做出此类诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Biology
ACS Chemical Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
353
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: ACS Chemical Biology provides an international forum for the rapid communication of research that broadly embraces the interface between chemistry and biology. The journal also serves as a forum to facilitate the communication between biologists and chemists that will translate into new research opportunities and discoveries. Results will be published in which molecular reasoning has been used to probe questions through in vitro investigations, cell biological methods, or organismic studies. We welcome mechanistic studies on proteins, nucleic acids, sugars, lipids, and nonbiological polymers. The journal serves a large scientific community, exploring cellular function from both chemical and biological perspectives. It is understood that submitted work is based upon original results and has not been published previously.
期刊最新文献
A key to unlocking the door: water pressure method for endoscopic submucosal dissection of a superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor with a history of multiple biopsies. Access to the left intrahepatic bile duct using an endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique. An unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of a giant cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst. Anorectal melanoma presenting as a polypoid lesion. Anti-reflux mucosal ablation for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1