{"title":"Diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and strategies for early recognition.","authors":"Suresh Pujar, J Helen Cross","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2323568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lennox Gastaut syndrome (LGS) as an electroclinical diagnosis has been utilized as a clinical entity for more than 70 years. However, with the recognition of other distinct electroclinical epilepsy syndromes, no consistent single etiology, and the variability of criteria used in clinical trials, the clinical utility of such a diagnosis has been questioned. Recently, the International League Against Epilepsy for the first time defined diagnostic criteria for epilepsy syndromes, thereby allowing consistent language and inclusion criteria to be utilized.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Recent diagnostic criteria for syndrome diagnosis are explored as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy, with further literature reviewed to highlight relevant features, and differential diagnosis explored.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy (DEE) is an overall term that may be descriptive of many different epilepsies, most of early onset, whether electroclinically or etiologically defined, of which LGS is one. Although we have moved forward in defining an increasing number of etiologically specific syndromes, this to date remains a minority of the DEEs. Although there is progress with precision medicine targeted at specific causes, the term LGS still remains useful as a diagnosis in defining treatment options, as well as overall prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"383-389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2323568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Lennox Gastaut syndrome (LGS) as an electroclinical diagnosis has been utilized as a clinical entity for more than 70 years. However, with the recognition of other distinct electroclinical epilepsy syndromes, no consistent single etiology, and the variability of criteria used in clinical trials, the clinical utility of such a diagnosis has been questioned. Recently, the International League Against Epilepsy for the first time defined diagnostic criteria for epilepsy syndromes, thereby allowing consistent language and inclusion criteria to be utilized.
Areas covered: Recent diagnostic criteria for syndrome diagnosis are explored as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy, with further literature reviewed to highlight relevant features, and differential diagnosis explored.
Expert opinion: Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy (DEE) is an overall term that may be descriptive of many different epilepsies, most of early onset, whether electroclinically or etiologically defined, of which LGS is one. Although we have moved forward in defining an increasing number of etiologically specific syndromes, this to date remains a minority of the DEEs. Although there is progress with precision medicine targeted at specific causes, the term LGS still remains useful as a diagnosis in defining treatment options, as well as overall prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points