Correlation between cephalic screw positioning of Standard Gamma 3 Nail for intertrochanteric fractures and cut-out incidence.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024006
Alessandro Ortolani, Debora Lana, Antonio Martucci, Francesco Pesce, Stefano Stallone, Lorenzo Milani, Roberto Urso, Giuseppe Melucci, Domenico Tigani
{"title":"Correlation between cephalic screw positioning of Standard Gamma 3 Nail for intertrochanteric fractures and cut-out incidence.","authors":"Alessandro Ortolani, Debora Lana, Antonio Martucci, Francesco Pesce, Stefano Stallone, Lorenzo Milani, Roberto Urso, Giuseppe Melucci, Domenico Tigani","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral fractures of proximal femur are the most frequent fractures in elderly people. Internal fixation using medullary nails is the gold standard of treatment (Gamma 3 nail is the most implanted device) due to reduced incidence of complications than other devices. We report our experience in treating this kind of fractures with Gamma 3 nail, between January 2015 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in our orthopaedic department; level of clinical care is III: 559 patients (431 females and 128 males, with an average age of 85.3 years) with lateral femoral neck fracture. All patients were surgically treated with Gamma 3 standard nail (SGN). We evaluated preliminary X-rays to classify fractures, according to AO-OTA classification and post-operative X-ray to verify cephalic screw position site, according to areas described by Cleveland in 1959: we measured tip-to-apex distance (TAD) and tip-to-apex calcar referred distance (CalTAD). Finally Chang reduction quality criteria (CRQC) for fracture reduction of trochanteric fractures were determined using preoperative or postoperative Antero-Posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs in a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Incidence of cut-out was evaluated in relation with these parameters. Patients were divided into 2 groups: first group had cephalic screw in optimal positions (5-8-9), the other group had cephalic screw in other positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 328 patients (58.7%) screw was in positions 5-8-9, in 231 patients (41.2%) screw was in not-optimal position. Median TAD was 19.1 ± 7.0 mm (range = 0.0-50.5); in 463 patients (82.8%) TAD was ≤ 25 mm. Median CalTAD was 21.4 ± 4.7 mm (range = 5.7-39.2); in 105 patients (79.4%) CalTAD was ≤ 25 mm. Cut-out was observed in 8 cases (1.43%). Multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation (p < 0,05) between incidence of cut-out and fracture type 31A2 and with TAD values >25 mm. Cephalic screw position did not influence incidence of cut-out.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In order to obtain fracture healing with a low risk of failure, in particular cut-out, it is necessary to obtain good reduction of fracture and optimal lag screw position in order to achieve a TAD inferior to 25 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10901073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral fractures of proximal femur are the most frequent fractures in elderly people. Internal fixation using medullary nails is the gold standard of treatment (Gamma 3 nail is the most implanted device) due to reduced incidence of complications than other devices. We report our experience in treating this kind of fractures with Gamma 3 nail, between January 2015 and December 2021.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in our orthopaedic department; level of clinical care is III: 559 patients (431 females and 128 males, with an average age of 85.3 years) with lateral femoral neck fracture. All patients were surgically treated with Gamma 3 standard nail (SGN). We evaluated preliminary X-rays to classify fractures, according to AO-OTA classification and post-operative X-ray to verify cephalic screw position site, according to areas described by Cleveland in 1959: we measured tip-to-apex distance (TAD) and tip-to-apex calcar referred distance (CalTAD). Finally Chang reduction quality criteria (CRQC) for fracture reduction of trochanteric fractures were determined using preoperative or postoperative Antero-Posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs in a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Incidence of cut-out was evaluated in relation with these parameters. Patients were divided into 2 groups: first group had cephalic screw in optimal positions (5-8-9), the other group had cephalic screw in other positions.

Results: In 328 patients (58.7%) screw was in positions 5-8-9, in 231 patients (41.2%) screw was in not-optimal position. Median TAD was 19.1 ± 7.0 mm (range = 0.0-50.5); in 463 patients (82.8%) TAD was ≤ 25 mm. Median CalTAD was 21.4 ± 4.7 mm (range = 5.7-39.2); in 105 patients (79.4%) CalTAD was ≤ 25 mm. Cut-out was observed in 8 cases (1.43%). Multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation (p < 0,05) between incidence of cut-out and fracture type 31A2 and with TAD values >25 mm. Cephalic screw position did not influence incidence of cut-out.

Discussion: In order to obtain fracture healing with a low risk of failure, in particular cut-out, it is necessary to obtain good reduction of fracture and optimal lag screw position in order to achieve a TAD inferior to 25 mm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗转子间骨折的标准 Gamma 3 钉头螺钉定位与切口发生率之间的相关性。
导言股骨近端外侧骨折是老年人最常见的骨折。使用髓内钉进行内固定是治疗的金标准(Gamma 3钉是植入最多的装置),因为与其他装置相比,并发症的发生率较低。我们报告了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间使用 Gamma 3 钉治疗此类骨折的经验:我们对在骨科接受治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究;临床护理级别为三级:559 名股骨颈外侧骨折患者(女性 431 名,男性 128 名,平均年龄 85.3 岁)。所有患者均接受了伽马 3 标准钉(SGN)手术治疗。我们根据 AO-OTA 分类法对初步 X 光片进行了骨折分类,并根据克利夫兰在 1959 年描述的区域对术后 X 光片进行了评估,以确认头螺钉的位置部位:我们测量了顶端到足尖的距离(TAD)和顶端到足尖的钙化距离(CalTAD)。最后,我们使用图片存档和通信系统(PACS)中的术前或术后前后位(AP)和侧位X光片,确定了转子骨折骨折复位的张氏复位质量标准(CRQC)。根据这些参数对切口发生率进行评估。患者分为两组:第一组在最佳位置(5-8-9)植入头螺钉,另一组在其他位置植入头螺钉:结果:328 名患者(58.7%)的螺钉位于 5-8-9 位置,231 名患者(41.2%)的螺钉位于非最佳位置。中位 TAD 为 19.1 ± 7.0 毫米(范围 = 0.0-50.5);463 位患者(82.8%)的 TAD 小于 25 毫米。CalTAD 中位数为 21.4 ± 4.7 毫米(范围 = 5.7-39.2);105 例患者(79.4%)的 CalTAD 小于 25 毫米。8例患者(1.43%)出现切口。多变量分析显示两者之间存在显著相关性(p 25 mm)。头螺钉位置对切口发生率没有影响:讨论:为了使骨折愈合,同时降低失败风险,尤其是切脱风险,有必要进行良好的骨折复位和最佳的滞后螺钉位置,以实现低于25毫米的TAD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility cups following failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures at a mean follow-up of 6 years. Prior medial meniscus arthroscopy is not associated with worst functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment. Delayed presentation of lower cervical facet dislocations: What to learn from past reports?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1