Satellite-based woody canopy cover for Africa: Uncovering bias and recovering best estimates across years

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2024.100124
Njoki Kahiu , Julius Anchang , Lara Prihodko , Qiuyan Yu , Niall Hanan
{"title":"Satellite-based woody canopy cover for Africa: Uncovering bias and recovering best estimates across years","authors":"Njoki Kahiu ,&nbsp;Julius Anchang ,&nbsp;Lara Prihodko ,&nbsp;Qiuyan Yu ,&nbsp;Niall Hanan","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Woody plants in both forested and non-forested areas are vital for carbon storage, climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and provision of ecosystem services. Accurate mapping of woody cover (WC) is crucial for understanding global environmental dynamics, but despite advancements in Earth observation (EO), challenges persist in WC mapping, particularly in spatially heterogeneous mixed tree-grass systems, characterized by low density and low stature (LDLS, i.e., savannas and dryland ecosystems) woody plants.</p><p>This study aims to guide users in selecting appropriate WC products for their analytical needs, particularly in LDLS ecosystems, and encourage WC product developers to consider incorporating dryland woody vegetation into their product development, utilizing modern EO data and techniques. To achieve this, we assessed existing WC products for the biome diverse Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), for epoch 2005–2010 (EP01) and 2015–2020 (EP02). Our analysis focused on LDLS, which are often overlooked in EO products. We provide error assessments for available WC products at continental and regional scales, in both epochs, providing data for optimal dataset selection. Our results show that WC products that exclude low stature woody vegetation (&lt;5 m height) from training data tend to underestimate WC in drylands, particularly in areas where WC is &lt;40%. However, in general models tend to underestimate cover in dense WC ecosystems. This could potentially be attributed to systematic bias in machine learning regression models, lack of sufficient training data, and increased prevalence of cultivation, and cloud contamination in more humid regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000087/pdfft?md5=2d640adca5045449bdea1e1a2248e563&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Woody plants in both forested and non-forested areas are vital for carbon storage, climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and provision of ecosystem services. Accurate mapping of woody cover (WC) is crucial for understanding global environmental dynamics, but despite advancements in Earth observation (EO), challenges persist in WC mapping, particularly in spatially heterogeneous mixed tree-grass systems, characterized by low density and low stature (LDLS, i.e., savannas and dryland ecosystems) woody plants.

This study aims to guide users in selecting appropriate WC products for their analytical needs, particularly in LDLS ecosystems, and encourage WC product developers to consider incorporating dryland woody vegetation into their product development, utilizing modern EO data and techniques. To achieve this, we assessed existing WC products for the biome diverse Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), for epoch 2005–2010 (EP01) and 2015–2020 (EP02). Our analysis focused on LDLS, which are often overlooked in EO products. We provide error assessments for available WC products at continental and regional scales, in both epochs, providing data for optimal dataset selection. Our results show that WC products that exclude low stature woody vegetation (<5 m height) from training data tend to underestimate WC in drylands, particularly in areas where WC is <40%. However, in general models tend to underestimate cover in dense WC ecosystems. This could potentially be attributed to systematic bias in machine learning regression models, lack of sufficient training data, and increased prevalence of cultivation, and cloud contamination in more humid regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于卫星的非洲林冠覆盖率:发现偏差并恢复跨年度最佳估计值
林区和非林区的木本植物对于碳储存、减缓气候变化、保护生物多样性和提供生态系统服务至关重要。准确绘制木本植物覆盖(WC)图对于了解全球环境动态至关重要,但尽管地球观测(EO)技术不断进步,木本植物覆盖图绘制工作仍面临挑战,尤其是在以低密度、低身材(LDLS,即热带稀树草原和旱地生态系统)木本植物为特征的空间异质性树草混合系统中、本研究旨在指导用户选择合适的 WC 产品以满足其分析需求,尤其是在低密度低身材生态系统中,并鼓励 WC 产品开发商考虑利用现代 EO 数据和技术将旱地木本植被纳入其产品开发中。为此,我们评估了 2005-2010 年(EP01)和 2015-2020 年(EP02)撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)生物群落多样性的现有 WC 产品。我们的分析侧重于低密度低纬度,而这往往在 EO 产品中被忽视。我们对两个纪元中大陆和区域尺度的现有 WC 产品进行了误差评估,为优化数据集选择提供了数据。我们的结果表明,从训练数据中排除低矮木本植被(<5 米高)的 WC 产品往往会低估旱地的 WC,尤其是在 WC 为<40%的地区。不过,一般来说,模型往往会低估高密度 WC 生态系统的覆盖率。这可能是由于机器学习回归模型的系统性偏差、缺乏足够的训练数据以及较潮湿地区种植和云污染的增加造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global soil moisture mapping at 5 km by combining GNSS reflectometry and machine learning in view of HydroGNSS Coastal vertical land motion across Southeast Asia derived from combining tide gauge and satellite altimetry observations Identifying thermokarst lakes using deep learning and high-resolution satellite images A two-stage deep learning architecture for detection global coastal and offshore submesoscale ocean eddy using SDGSAT-1 multispectral imagery A comprehensive evaluation of satellite-based and reanalysis soil moisture products over the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1