MxML (Exploring the Relationship between Measurement and Machine Learning): Current State of the Field

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1111/emip.12593
Yi Zheng, Steven Nydick, Sijia Huang, Susu Zhang
{"title":"MxML (Exploring the Relationship between Measurement and Machine Learning): Current State of the Field","authors":"Yi Zheng,&nbsp;Steven Nydick,&nbsp;Sijia Huang,&nbsp;Susu Zhang","doi":"10.1111/emip.12593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent surge of machine learning (ML) has impacted many disciplines, including educational and psychological measurement (hereafter shortened as <i>measurement</i>). The measurement literature has seen rapid growth in applications of ML to solve measurement problems. However, as we emphasize in this article, it is imperative to critically examine the potential risks associated with involving ML in measurement. The MxML project aims to explore the relationship between measurement and ML, so as to identify and address the risks and better harness the power of ML to serve measurement missions. This paper describes the first study of the MxML project, in which we summarize the state of the field of applications, extensions, and discussions about ML in measurement contexts with a systematic review of the recent 10 years’ literature. We provide a snapshot of the literature in (1) areas of measurement where ML is discussed, (2) types of articles (e.g., applications, conceptual, etc.), (3) ML methods discussed, and (4) potential risks associated with involving ML in measurement, which result from the differences between what measurement tasks need versus what ML techniques can provide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"43 1","pages":"19-38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent surge of machine learning (ML) has impacted many disciplines, including educational and psychological measurement (hereafter shortened as measurement). The measurement literature has seen rapid growth in applications of ML to solve measurement problems. However, as we emphasize in this article, it is imperative to critically examine the potential risks associated with involving ML in measurement. The MxML project aims to explore the relationship between measurement and ML, so as to identify and address the risks and better harness the power of ML to serve measurement missions. This paper describes the first study of the MxML project, in which we summarize the state of the field of applications, extensions, and discussions about ML in measurement contexts with a systematic review of the recent 10 years’ literature. We provide a snapshot of the literature in (1) areas of measurement where ML is discussed, (2) types of articles (e.g., applications, conceptual, etc.), (3) ML methods discussed, and (4) potential risks associated with involving ML in measurement, which result from the differences between what measurement tasks need versus what ML techniques can provide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MxML(探索测量与机器学习之间的关系):领域现状
近年来,机器学习(ML)的迅猛发展影响了许多学科,包括教育和心理测量(以下简称测量)。在测量文献中,应用 ML 解决测量问题的案例迅速增加。然而,正如我们在本文中所强调的,必须严格审查将 ML 应用于测量的潜在风险。MxML 项目旨在探索测量与 ML 之间的关系,从而识别和应对风险,更好地利用 ML 的力量为测量任务服务。本文介绍了 MxML 项目的第一项研究,通过对最近 10 年的文献进行系统回顾,我们总结了有关测量背景下 ML 的应用、扩展和讨论领域的现状。我们提供了以下方面的文献快照:(1) 讨论 ML 的测量领域;(2) 文章类型(如应用、概念等);(3) 讨论的 ML 方法;(4) 将 ML 应用于测量的潜在风险,这些风险源于测量任务的需求与 ML 技术所能提供的需求之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Issue Cover On the Cover: Gendered Trajectories of Digital Literacy Development: Insights from a Longitudinal Cohort Study Digital Module 36: Applying Intersectionality Theory to Educational Measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1