Assessing the Landscape of Lactation Education: Results of a Pilot Survey.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1177/08903344241232402
Hope Katherine Lima, Ashley Licata, Shondra Mattos
{"title":"Assessing the Landscape of Lactation Education: Results of a Pilot Survey.","authors":"Hope Katherine Lima, Ashley Licata, Shondra Mattos","doi":"10.1177/08903344241232402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of lactation currently uses breastfeeding rates to measure effectiveness. While monitoring breastfeeding outcomes can provide insight into the successes of lactation consulting as a profession, the improvement of breastfeeding outcomes is a multifactorial issue. In order to facilitate the growth of lactation education processes, understanding experiences during training and perceptions of readiness of current International Board Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLC) for clinical practice is necessary.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>The aim of this survey was to provide a baseline assessment of the current landscape of the lactation profession through data related to certification, job market, practice confidence after passing the International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE) certifying examination, and perceptions of specializations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was used to assess the experiences of practicing IBCLCs. Non-probability convenience sampling was implemented from December 2021 through January 2022. A total of 281 unique responses were recorded with complete data on variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of respondents were white females under age 50 located in the United States. The majority of respondents were certified through a Pathway 1. The largest barrier to certification was reported to be a lack of clinical/mentorship opportunities. Respondents were significantly more confident in providing entry-level support to dyads when mentored by four or more preceptors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diversification of the field of lactation is necessary to provide appropriate support to lactating families in the United States. Additionally, addressing the barrier of accessing clinical/mentorship opportunities is essential for continued growth of the field of lactation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241232402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The field of lactation currently uses breastfeeding rates to measure effectiveness. While monitoring breastfeeding outcomes can provide insight into the successes of lactation consulting as a profession, the improvement of breastfeeding outcomes is a multifactorial issue. In order to facilitate the growth of lactation education processes, understanding experiences during training and perceptions of readiness of current International Board Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLC) for clinical practice is necessary.

Research aim: The aim of this survey was to provide a baseline assessment of the current landscape of the lactation profession through data related to certification, job market, practice confidence after passing the International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners (IBLCE) certifying examination, and perceptions of specializations.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to assess the experiences of practicing IBCLCs. Non-probability convenience sampling was implemented from December 2021 through January 2022. A total of 281 unique responses were recorded with complete data on variables of interest.

Results: The majority of respondents were white females under age 50 located in the United States. The majority of respondents were certified through a Pathway 1. The largest barrier to certification was reported to be a lack of clinical/mentorship opportunities. Respondents were significantly more confident in providing entry-level support to dyads when mentored by four or more preceptors.

Conclusion: Diversification of the field of lactation is necessary to provide appropriate support to lactating families in the United States. Additionally, addressing the barrier of accessing clinical/mentorship opportunities is essential for continued growth of the field of lactation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估母乳喂养教育的现状:试点调查结果。
背景:哺乳领域目前使用母乳喂养率来衡量成效。虽然对母乳喂养结果的监测可以帮助人们深入了解哺乳咨询作为一个专业所取得的成功,但母乳喂养结果的改善是一个多因素的问题。为了促进泌乳教育过程的发展,有必要了解当前国际认证泌乳咨询师(IBCLC)在接受培训期间的经历以及对临床实践准备情况的看法。研究目的:本调查旨在通过与认证、就业市场、通过国际泌乳咨询师考试委员会(IBLCE)认证考试后的实践信心以及对专业化的看法相关的数据,对泌乳咨询行业的现状进行基线评估:方法:采用横断面研究设计来评估执业 IBCLC 的经验。在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月期间进行了非概率方便抽样调查。共记录了 281 份独特的回复,其中包含相关变量的完整数据:大多数受访者为美国 50 岁以下的白人女性。大多数受访者通过 "途径 1 "获得认证。据报告,获得认证的最大障碍是缺乏临床/导师机会。受访者在接受四名或更多实习医生指导时,对为二人组提供入门级支持的信心明显增强:结论:要为美国的哺乳期家庭提供适当的支持,就必须实现哺乳领域的多元化。此外,解决获得临床/导师机会的障碍对于哺乳领域的持续发展也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
期刊最新文献
Documenting Our History. Response to Letter to the Editor. Trajectories of Breastfeeding-Related Thoughts and Attitudes Among Low-Income Smoke-Exposed Pregnant Women: A Latent Class Growth Analysis. Barriers and Facilitators in Lactation Support for the Preterm Mother-Infant Dyad: An Integrated Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1