Skeletal Traction for Isolated Femur Fractures Does Not Reduce Opioid Consumption.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002791
Brian Mullis, Jesse Caballero, Abhijit Seetharam, Lauren Ingrid Pitz, Greg E Gaski
{"title":"Skeletal Traction for Isolated Femur Fractures Does Not Reduce Opioid Consumption.","authors":"Brian Mullis, Jesse Caballero, Abhijit Seetharam, Lauren Ingrid Pitz, Greg E Gaski","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Isolated femoral shaft fractures can be treated preoperatively with skeletal traction (TXN) or maintenance of a position of comfort (COMF). The goal of this retrospective review was to determine whether preoperative opioid consumption differs significantly between these forms of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case-control retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic Level 1 trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated OTA/AO 32A-C femoral shaft fractures from 2017 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was preoperative opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents) comparing patients treated with application of TXN or placed in a position of COMF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty patients were studied (COMF n = 167, TXN n = 53). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significantly greater preoperative opioid consumption in the emergency department for the TXN group compared with COMF (2.6 more morphine milligram equivalents [confidence interval, 0.23-4.96], P = 0.031). There was no difference in preoperative opioid consumption between groups on the hospital floor ( P = 0.811) nor during the entire preoperative course ( P = 0.486). The total preoperative rate of opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents/hour) did not differ ( P = 0.825).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures treated preoperatively with skeletal traction consumed more opioids in the emergency department compared with patients treated in a position of comfort, but no difference in opioid consumption was observed between groups for the entire preoperative course. A position of comfort may be considered as an acceptable alternative to skeletal traction for patients with isolated femur fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"338-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Isolated femoral shaft fractures can be treated preoperatively with skeletal traction (TXN) or maintenance of a position of comfort (COMF). The goal of this retrospective review was to determine whether preoperative opioid consumption differs significantly between these forms of treatment.

Methods:

Design: Case-control retrospective study.

Setting: Two academic Level 1 trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: Patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated OTA/AO 32A-C femoral shaft fractures from 2017 to 2020.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was preoperative opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents) comparing patients treated with application of TXN or placed in a position of COMF.

Results: Two hundred and twenty patients were studied (COMF n = 167, TXN n = 53). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significantly greater preoperative opioid consumption in the emergency department for the TXN group compared with COMF (2.6 more morphine milligram equivalents [confidence interval, 0.23-4.96], P = 0.031). There was no difference in preoperative opioid consumption between groups on the hospital floor ( P = 0.811) nor during the entire preoperative course ( P = 0.486). The total preoperative rate of opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents/hour) did not differ ( P = 0.825).

Conclusions: Patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures treated preoperatively with skeletal traction consumed more opioids in the emergency department compared with patients treated in a position of comfort, but no difference in opioid consumption was observed between groups for the entire preoperative course. A position of comfort may be considered as an acceptable alternative to skeletal traction for patients with isolated femur fractures.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨骼牵引治疗孤立性股骨骨折不会减少阿片类药物的用量。
目标:股骨干孤立性骨折可在术前采用骨骼牵引(TXN)或维持舒适体位(COMF)治疗。本回顾性研究旨在确定这两种治疗方式的术前阿片类药物用量是否存在显著差异:方法:设计:方法: 设计:病例对照回顾性研究:患者选择标准:2017-2020年因孤立性OTA/AO 32A-C股骨干骨折到急诊科就诊的患者.结果测量和比较:主要结果为术前阿片类药物消耗量(吗啡毫克当量(MME)),比较采用骨骼牵引(TXN)或舒适体位(COMF)治疗的患者:研究了 220 名患者(COMF 167 人,TXN 53 人)。多变量回归分析显示,TXN组与COMF组相比,在急诊科(ED)的术前阿片类药物消耗量明显更大(多出2.6 MME [CI 0.23,4.96],P=0.031))。在医院楼层(P=0.811)和整个术前过程(P=0.486)中,各组间的术前阿片类药物消耗量没有差异。术前阿片类药物总用量(MME/小时)没有差异(P=0.825):结论:与采用舒适体位治疗的患者相比,术前采用骨骼牵引治疗的孤立性股骨柄骨折患者在急诊室消耗的阿片类药物更多,但在整个术前治疗过程中,观察到不同组别之间的阿片类药物消耗量没有差异。对于孤立性股骨骨折患者来说,舒适体位可被视为骨骼牵引的一种可接受的替代方法:证据等级:治疗三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures? The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. A Retrospective Study of Ballistic Pelvic Fractures With Focus on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1